• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在考虑管理竞争合同的情况下,商业模式效率和新颖性与结果之间的关系:荷兰物理治疗初级保健组织的定量研究。

The relations between business model efficiency and novelty, and outcome while accounting for managed competition contract: a quantitative study among Dutch physiotherapy primary healthcare organisations.

机构信息

Research Group Financial-Economic Advise on Innovation, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 15, Utrecht, 3584 CS, the Netherlands.

Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, Brain, Centre Rudolf Magnus, Utrecht University, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 3;22(1):990. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08383-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-022-08383-7
PMID:35922844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9351119/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 2006, business principles have been introduced to foster efficient healthcare by way of managed competition. Managed competition is expressed by a contract between a health insurer and a physiotherapy primary healthcare organisation (PTPHO). In such a managed environment, PTPHOs have to attain treatment service quality and financial PTPHO-centred outcomes Research shows that business model designs may enhance organisation-centred outcomes. A business model is a design (efficiency or novelty) of how a firm transacts with customers, partners, and vendors; how it connects with markets. However, research on managed competition contract and business model designs, in relation to PTPHO-centred outcomes is new to the healthcare literature. PTPHOs may not know how business model designs enhance outcomes. This study aims to delineate the relations between business model efficiency and novelty, and PTPHO-centred outcomes, while accounting for managed competition contract in Dutch healthcare.

METHODS

A quantitative cross-sectional design was adopted. Using a questionnaire, the relations between managed competition, business model efficiency and novelty, and PTPHO-centred outcomes were investigated among PTPHO managers (n = 138). Theory-based expectations were set up and multiple linear regression analyses were applied.

RESULTS

Managed competition and business model efficiency show no relation with PTPHO-centred outcomes. Moderation of the business model efficiency and PTPHO-centred outcomes relation by managed competition contract is not detected. Business model novelty shows a positive relation with PTPHO-centred outcomes. Moderation of the business model novelty and PTPHO-centred outcomes relation by managed competition contract is found.

CONCLUSIONS

There seem to be positive relations between business model novelty and PTPHO-centred outcomes on its own and moderated by managed competition contract. No relations seem to exist with business model efficiency. This implies that the combination of persistent use of health insurer-driven managed competition contracts and a naturally efficient PTPHOs may have left too few means for these organisations to contribute to healthcare reforms and attain PTPHO-centred outcomes. Organisation-driven innovation could stretch system-level regulations and provide room for new business models. Optimising contracts towards organisation-driven healthcare reform, including novelty requirements and corresponding reimbursements is suggested. PTPHO managers may want to shift their attitudes towards novel business models.

摘要

背景

自 2006 年以来,商业原则被引入医疗保健领域,通过管理竞争来提高效率。管理竞争通过健康保险公司和物理治疗初级保健组织 (PTPHO) 之间的合同来体现。在这种管理环境下,PTPHO 必须达到治疗服务质量和以 PTPHO 为中心的财务结果。研究表明,商业模式设计可以提高以组织为中心的结果。商业模式是公司与客户、合作伙伴和供应商交易的设计(效率或新颖性);它如何与市场连接。然而,与以 PTPHO 为中心的结果相关的管理竞争合同和商业模式设计的研究在医疗保健文献中是新的。PTPHO 可能不知道商业模式设计如何提高成果。本研究旨在阐明商业模型效率和新颖性与以 PTPHO 为中心的结果之间的关系,同时考虑到荷兰医疗保健中的管理竞争合同。

方法

采用定量横断面设计。使用问卷,调查了 PTPHO 经理(n=138)之间管理竞争、商业模式效率和新颖性与以 PTPHO 为中心的结果之间的关系。根据理论预期,进行了多元线性回归分析。

结果

管理竞争和商业模式效率与以 PTPHO 为中心的结果之间没有关系。未检测到管理竞争合同对商业模式效率和以 PTPHO 为中心的结果关系的调节作用。商业模式新颖性与以 PTPHO 为中心的结果呈正相关。发现管理竞争合同对商业模式新颖性和以 PTPHO 为中心的结果关系的调节作用。

结论

在没有管理竞争合同的情况下,商业模式新颖性与以 PTPHO 为中心的结果之间似乎存在正相关关系,并且受到管理竞争合同的调节。与商业模式效率似乎不存在关系。这意味着持续使用保险公司驱动的管理竞争合同和自然高效的 PTPHO 的组合可能已经为这些组织提供了太少的手段来为医疗改革做出贡献并实现以 PTPHO 为中心的结果。组织驱动的创新可以拓展系统层面的监管,并为新商业模式提供空间。建议优化合同,以支持组织驱动的医疗改革,包括新颖性要求和相应的报销。PTPHO 经理可能希望改变他们对新颖商业模式的态度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe41/9351119/28bf9d08b0d9/12913_2022_8383_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe41/9351119/6c3284efa565/12913_2022_8383_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe41/9351119/9ce166030781/12913_2022_8383_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe41/9351119/28bf9d08b0d9/12913_2022_8383_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe41/9351119/6c3284efa565/12913_2022_8383_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe41/9351119/9ce166030781/12913_2022_8383_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe41/9351119/28bf9d08b0d9/12913_2022_8383_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The relations between business model efficiency and novelty, and outcome while accounting for managed competition contract: a quantitative study among Dutch physiotherapy primary healthcare organisations.在考虑管理竞争合同的情况下,商业模式效率和新颖性与结果之间的关系:荷兰物理治疗初级保健组织的定量研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 3;22(1):990. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08383-7.
2
Building and changing business models: a qualitative study among Dutch physiotherapy primary healthcare organisations.构建与变革商业模式:荷兰物理治疗初级医疗保健机构的定性研究
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2022 Mar 22;23:e19. doi: 10.1017/S1463423621000840.
3
Measuring Healthcare Providers' Performances Within Managed Competition Using Multidimensional Quality and Cost Indicators.使用多维质量和成本指标衡量管理式竞争中医疗服务提供者的绩效。
Health Econ. 2016 Apr;25(4):408-23. doi: 10.1002/hec.3158. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
4
Managing the health care market in developing countries: prospects and problems.发展中国家医疗保健市场的管理:前景与问题
Health Policy Plan. 1994 Sep;9(3):237-51. doi: 10.1093/heapol/9.3.237.
5
Effects of the reform of the Dutch healthcare into managed competition: Results of a Delphi study among experts.荷兰医疗保健改革对管理竞争的影响:专家德尔菲研究的结果。
Health Policy. 2021 Jan;125(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
6
Managed competition, governmentality and institutional response in the United Kingdom.英国的管理式竞争、治理与制度回应
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Apr;52(8):1167-81. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00237-9.
7
Dutch healthcare reform: did it result in performance improvement of health plans? A comparison of consumer experiences over time.荷兰医疗改革:是否提高了医保计划的绩效?基于消费者体验的纵向比较
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Sep 17;9:167. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-167.
8
Contract Design: Financial Options and Risk.合约设计:金融期权与风险
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Jan 12;18(1):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3615.
9
How does managed competition affect hospital prices in a social health insurance system? The Colombian case.在社会医疗保险体系中,管理式竞争如何影响医院价格?以哥伦比亚为例。
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Nov 1;33(9):1037-1046. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy085.
10
Exploring limits to market-based reform: managed competition and rehabilitation home care services in Ontario.探索基于市场的改革的局限性:安大略省的管理式竞争与康复家庭护理服务
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Apr;62(7):1594-604. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.042. Epub 2005 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring business models for managing uncertainty in healthcare, medical devices, and biotechnology industries.探索医疗保健、医疗设备和生物技术行业中管理不确定性的商业模式。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 7;10(4):e25962. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25962. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
2
Public-private partnership models for rehabilitation service delivery: A scoping review.康复服务提供的公私伙伴关系模式:一项范围综述。
S Afr J Physiother. 2023 May 18;79(1):1856. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1856. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Designing a stakeholder-inclusive service model for an eHealth service to support older adults in an active and social life.为一项电子健康服务设计一个包含利益相关者的服务模式,以支持老年人积极和社交的生活。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 5;21(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06597-9.
2
Benchmarking outcomes on multiple contextual levels in lean healthcare: a systematic review, development of a conceptual framework, and a research agenda.在精益医疗保健中多个上下文层面进行基准测试的结果:系统评价、概念框架的制定和研究议程。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 19;21(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06160-6.
3
Effects of the reform of the Dutch healthcare into managed competition: Results of a Delphi study among experts.
荷兰医疗保健改革对管理竞争的影响:专家德尔菲研究的结果。
Health Policy. 2021 Jan;125(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
4
A Health Care Value Framework for Physical Therapy Primary Health Care Organizations.物理治疗初级保健组织的医疗保健价值框架。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2021;30(1):27-35. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000289.
5
The impact of changing provider remuneration on clinical activity and quality of care: Evaluation of a pilot NHS contract in Northern Ireland.改变提供者报酬对临床活动和医疗质量的影响:对北爱尔兰国民保健服务合同试点的评估。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;48(5):395-401. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12544. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
6
Value-Based Care for Musculoskeletal Pain: Are Physical Therapists Ready to Deliver?基于价值的肌肉骨骼疼痛护理:物理治疗师是否已准备好提供服务?
Phys Ther. 2020 Apr 17;100(4):621-632. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz171.
7
Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes.情境在实施科学中很重要:对描述实施结果情境决定因素的决定因素框架的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 25;19(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4015-3.
8
Cost-effectiveness of a blended physiotherapy intervention compared to usual physiotherapy in patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis: a cluster randomized controlled trial.混合物理治疗干预与常规物理治疗在髋和/或膝骨关节炎患者中的成本效益比较:一项整群随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 31;18(1):1082. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5975-7.
9
Why do German physicians reject managed care?为什么德国医生拒绝管理式医疗?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Jan;34(1):87-99. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2575. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
10
Contract Design: The problem of information asymmetry.合同设计:信息不对称问题。
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Jan 12;18(1):1. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3614.