van der Poel Louise A J, Booth Jane, Argent Andrew, van Dijk Monique, Zampoli Marco
Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Paediatric Pulmonology, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2017 Sep;30(3):163-170. doi: 10.1089/ped.2016.0727. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
Poor socioeconomic circumstances and poverty are perceived to be barriers to successful home ventilation. Pediatric home ventilation has escalated rapidly in high-income countries but is underreported and underfunded in low-middle income countries. A retrospective chart review covering the past 20 years was carried out at the Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa, a low-middle income country. Data collection included demographics, socioeconomic and family factors, clinical information, and ventilation-related information. Fifty-five children received home ventilation between 1994 and December 2015 from a median age of 3.5 years (range 0.4-17.6). Thirty-nine (71%) children received invasive ventilation and 16 (29%) children received mask-assisted ventilation. Most common primary diagnosis was a neuromuscular disease (60%). Twenty-six children (47%) were still on home ventilation in December 2015, 8 (15%) had been weaned off ventilation, and 21 (38%) had died. Median time between initiation of ventilation and discharge was 15 days (range 1-52) for mask-assisted ventilation and 88 days (8-991) for tracheostomy-assisted ventilation. Of the total 40 readmissions in the first year of home ventilation, 34 (85%) were emergency readmissions mainly necessitated by respiratory infections ( = 26; 65%). Despite a high prevalence of socioeconomic challenges, 89% of the children were successfully discharged on home ventilation. Main cause of death was acute infections ( = 11; 52%). Pediatric home ventilation in South Africa is feasible despite difficult socioeconomic circumstances. Survival outcome was comparable with that of high-income countries. However, a high level of psychosocial support and interventions is needed.
社会经济状况不佳和贫困被认为是家庭成功进行通气治疗的障碍。儿科家庭通气在高收入国家迅速增加,但在中低收入国家报告不足且资金匮乏。在南非开普敦的红十字战争纪念儿童医院(一个中低收入国家)进行了一项涵盖过去20年的回顾性病历审查。数据收集包括人口统计学、社会经济和家庭因素、临床信息以及通气相关信息。1994年至2015年12月期间,55名儿童接受了家庭通气治疗,中位年龄为3.5岁(范围0.4 - 17.6岁)。39名(71%)儿童接受了有创通气,16名(29%)儿童接受了面罩辅助通气。最常见的主要诊断是神经肌肉疾病(60%)。2015年12月,26名儿童(47%)仍在接受家庭通气治疗,8名(15%)已脱机,21名(38%)死亡。面罩辅助通气开始通气至出院的中位时间为15天(范围1 - 52天),气管切开辅助通气为88天(8 - 991天)。在家庭通气治疗的第一年,40次再入院中,34次(85%)为紧急再入院,主要是由呼吸道感染导致(n = 26;65%)。尽管社会经济挑战普遍存在,但89%的儿童成功出院并接受家庭通气治疗。主要死亡原因是急性感染(n = 11;52%)。尽管社会经济状况困难,但南非的儿科家庭通气治疗是可行的。生存结果与高收入国家相当。然而,需要高水平的心理社会支持和干预措施。