• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

果干摄入量与全癌发病率风险之间的关联:一项两样本孟德尔随机化研究。

Association between dried fruit intake and pan-cancers incidence risk: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

作者信息

Jin Chen, Li Rui, Deng Tuo, Lin Zixia, Li Haoqi, Yang Yan, Su Qing, Wang Jingxian, Yang Yi, Wang Juejin, Chen Gang, Wang Yi

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2022 Jul 18;9:899137. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.899137. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fnut.2022.899137
PMID:35923199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9339715/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Observational studies have revealed that dried fruit intake may be associated with cancer incidence; however, confounding factors make the results prone to be disturbed. Therefore, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to explore the causal relationship between dried fruit intake and 11 site-specific cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three single nucleoside polymers (SNPs) with robust genome-wide association study (GWAS) evidence, strongly correlated with dried fruit intake, were used as instrumental variables (IVs) in this study. The summary-level genetic datasets of site-specific cancers were obtained from the Oncoarray oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer consortium, International Lung Cancer Consortium, Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, PanScan1, and GWAS of other scholars. We analyzed the causality between dried fruit intake and 11 site-specific cancers using the inverse-variance-weighted (IVW) and weighted median (WM) methods. For the results of the MR analysis, Cochran's test was used to check for heterogeneity, and multiplicative random effects were used to evaluate the heterogeneity further. Gene pleiotropy was tested using MR-Egger regression and MR-PRESSO methods. In addition, the main results of this study were validated by using the summary statistical data from the FinnGen and UK Biobank databases, and adjusted body mass index (BMI), years of education, fresh fruit intake, and vitamin C using multivariable MR analysis to ensure the stability of the research results.

RESULTS

The evidence from IVW analyses showed that each increase of dried fruit intake by one standard deviation was statistically significantly associated with 82.68% decrease of oral cavity/pharyngeal cancer incidence risk ( = 0.0131), 67.01% decrease of lung cancer incidence risk ( = 0.0011), 77% decrease of squamous cell lung cancer incidence risk ( = 0.0026), 53.07% decrease of breast cancer incidence risk ( = 4.62 × 10), 39.72% decrease of ovarian cancer incidence risk ( = 0.0183), 97.26% decrease of pancreatic cancer incidence risk ( = 0.0280), 0.53% decrease of cervical cancer incidence risk ( = 0.0482); however, there was no significant effect on lung adenocarcinoma ( = 0.4343), endometrial cancer ( = 0.8742), thyroid cancer ( = 0.6352), prostate cancer ( = 0.5354), bladder cancer ( = 0.8996), and brain cancer ( = 0.8164). In the validation part of the study results, the causal relationship between dried fruit intake and lung cancer ( = 0.0043), squamous cell lung cancer ( = 0.0136), and breast cancer ( = 0.0192) was determined. After adjusting for the potential impact of confounders, the causal relationship between dried fruit intake and lung cancer ( = 0.0034), squamous cell lung cancer ( = 0.046), and breast cancer ( = 0.0001) remained. The sensitivity analysis showed that our results were stable and reliable.

CONCLUSION

The intake of dried fruits may have a protective effect against some site-specific cancers. Therefore, health education and a reasonable adjustment of dietary proportions may help in the primary prevention of cancer.

摘要

背景

观察性研究表明,食用果干可能与癌症发病率有关;然而,混杂因素使结果容易受到干扰。因此,我们进行了一项两样本孟德尔随机化(MR)研究,以探讨食用果干与11种特定部位癌症之间的因果关系。

材料与方法

本研究使用了43个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)作为工具变量(IV),这些SNP具有可靠的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)证据,且与果干摄入量密切相关。特定部位癌症的汇总水平遗传数据集来自口腔和口咽癌联盟的Oncoarray、国际肺癌联盟、乳腺癌协会联盟(BCAC)、卵巢癌协会联盟、PanScan1以及其他学者的GWAS。我们使用逆方差加权(IVW)和加权中位数(WM)方法分析了食用果干与11种特定部位癌症之间的因果关系。对于MR分析的结果,使用Cochran's Q检验检查异质性,并使用乘性随机效应进一步评估异质性。使用MR-Egger回归和MR-PRESSO方法检验基因多效性。此外,本研究的主要结果通过使用来自芬兰基因库(FinnGen)和英国生物银行(UK Biobank)数据库的汇总统计数据进行了验证,并通过多变量MR分析调整了体重指数(BMI)、受教育年限、新鲜水果摄入量和维生素C,以确保研究结果的稳定性。

结果

IVW分析的证据表明,果干摄入量每增加一个标准差,口腔/咽癌发病风险降低82.68%(P = 0.0131),肺癌发病风险降低67.01%(P = 0.0011),肺鳞状细胞癌发病风险降低77%(P = 0.0026),乳腺癌发病风险降低53.07%(P = 4.62×10⁻⁴),卵巢癌发病风险降低39.72%(P = 0.0183),胰腺癌发病风险降低97.26%(P = 0.0280),宫颈癌发病风险降低0.53%(P = 0.0482);然而,对肺腺癌(P = 0.4343)、子宫内膜癌(P = 0.8742)、甲状腺癌(P = 0.6352)、前列腺癌(P = 0.5354)、膀胱癌(P = 0.8996)和脑癌(P = 0.8164)没有显著影响。在研究结果的验证部分,确定了果干摄入量与肺癌(P = 0.0043)、肺鳞状细胞癌(P = 0.0136)和乳腺癌(P = 0.0192)之间的因果关系。在调整混杂因素的潜在影响后,果干摄入量与肺癌(P = 0.0034)、肺鳞状细胞癌(P = 0.046)和乳腺癌(P = 0.0001)之间的因果关系仍然存在。敏感性分析表明,我们的结果稳定可靠。

结论

食用果干可能对某些特定部位的癌症具有保护作用。因此,健康教育和合理调整饮食比例可能有助于癌症的一级预防。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc2b/9339715/fda210393e6c/fnut-09-899137-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc2b/9339715/4af9634519de/fnut-09-899137-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc2b/9339715/82d9f575262f/fnut-09-899137-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc2b/9339715/8289035ffd1d/fnut-09-899137-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc2b/9339715/45778f00ef85/fnut-09-899137-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc2b/9339715/fda210393e6c/fnut-09-899137-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc2b/9339715/4af9634519de/fnut-09-899137-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc2b/9339715/82d9f575262f/fnut-09-899137-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc2b/9339715/8289035ffd1d/fnut-09-899137-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc2b/9339715/45778f00ef85/fnut-09-899137-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc2b/9339715/fda210393e6c/fnut-09-899137-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between dried fruit intake and pan-cancers incidence risk: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.果干摄入量与全癌发病率风险之间的关联:一项两样本孟德尔随机化研究。
Front Nutr. 2022 Jul 18;9:899137. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.899137. eCollection 2022.
2
The association between fruit and vegetable intake and gastrointestinal cancers risk from Mendelian randomization analysis.基于孟德尔随机化分析的水果和蔬菜摄入与胃肠道癌风险之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 21;14(1):28860. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79650-2.
3
Causal association between dried fruit intake and risk of osteoarthritis: A Mendelian randomization study.干水果摄入与骨关节炎风险之间的因果关系:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Apr 5;103(14):e37710. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037710.
4
Association between Dried Fruit Intake and DNA Methylation: A Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Analysis.干水果摄入量与 DNA 甲基化的关联:多变量孟德尔随机化分析。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2023;27(11):1132-1139. doi: 10.1007/s12603-023-2030-x.
5
Causal relationship between dietary factors and breast cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study.饮食因素与乳腺癌风险之间的因果关系:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 14;9(10):e20980. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20980. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Dietary factors and oral cancer risk: a comprehensive Mendelian randomization analysis in a European population.饮食因素与口腔癌风险:欧洲人群的综合孟德尔随机化分析
Discov Oncol. 2025 Apr 16;16(1):540. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02247-2.
7
[Genetic Causation Analysis of Hyperandrogenemia Testing Indicators and Preeclampsia].[高雄激素血症检测指标与子痫前期的遗传因果关系分析]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 May 20;55(3):566-573. doi: 10.12182/20240560106.
8
The causal relationship between thyroid function, autoimune thyroid dysfunction and lung cancer: a mendelian randomization study.甲状腺功能、自身免疫性甲状腺功能障碍与肺癌之间的因果关系:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Sep 11;23(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02588-0.
9
Causal associations between dried fruit intake and cardiovascular disease: A Mendelian randomization study.果干摄入量与心血管疾病之间的因果关联:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Feb 6;10:1080252. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1080252. eCollection 2023.
10
Causal associations between dietary factors with head and neck cancer: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.饮食因素与头颈癌之间的因果关联:一项两样本孟德尔随机化研究。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Jan 7;10(1):e70070. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70070. eCollection 2025 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetically proxied risk and protective factors for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization studies.胰腺癌的遗传代理风险和保护因素:孟德尔随机化研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Jun 30;16(3):1233-1247. doi: 10.21037/jgo-2025-305. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
2
Causal association between dietary factors and telomere length revealed by mendelian randomization.孟德尔随机化研究揭示饮食因素与端粒长度之间的因果关联。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 1;15(1):11082. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87693-2.
3
Mediation effect of plasma metabolites on the relationship between immune cells and the risk of prostatitis: A study by bidirectional 2-sample and Bayesian-weighted Mendelian randomization.

本文引用的文献

1
Fruit and vegetable consumption and incident breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.水果和蔬菜的消费与乳腺癌的发生:前瞻性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Cancer. 2021 Jul;125(2):284-298. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01373-2. Epub 2021 May 18.
2
Dried fruit consumption and cardiometabolic health: a randomised crossover trial.干果果脯摄入量与心脏代谢健康:一项随机交叉试验。
Br J Nutr. 2020 Nov 14;124(9):912-921. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520002007. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
3
Mendelian randomization accounting for correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects using genome-wide summary statistics.
双向两样本和贝叶斯加权孟德尔随机化研究血浆代谢物对免疫细胞与前列腺炎风险关系的中介效应。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 11;103(41):e40024. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040024.
4
Causal associations of MICB, CTSA, and MMP9 proteins with oral cancer: Mendelian randomization study.MICB、CTSA 和 MMP9 蛋白与口腔癌的因果关系:孟德尔随机化研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 27;14(1):25645. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77042-0.
5
Association between fruit intake and non-small cell lung cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.水果摄入量与非小细胞肺癌之间的关联:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024 Sep 30;13(9):2388-2394. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-24-276. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
6
Causal association of dietary factors with five common cancers: univariate and multivariate Mendelian randomization studies.饮食因素与五种常见癌症的因果关联:单变量和多变量孟德尔随机化研究
Front Nutr. 2024 Jul 29;11:1428844. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1428844. eCollection 2024.
7
The Risk of Oral Cancer and the High Consumption of Thermally Processed Meat Containing Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Compounds.热加工肉类中含有致突变和致癌化合物,大量食用会增加患口腔癌的风险。
Nutrients. 2024 Apr 7;16(7):1084. doi: 10.3390/nu16071084.
8
Associations between genetically determined dietary factors and risk of autism spectrum disorder: a Mendelian randomization study.基因决定的饮食因素与自闭症谱系障碍风险之间的关联:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Front Nutr. 2024 Mar 1;11:1210855. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1210855. eCollection 2024.
9
Risk factors for prostate cancer: An umbrella review of prospective observational studies and mendelian randomization analyses.前列腺癌的风险因素:前瞻性观察研究和孟德尔随机分析的伞状综述。
PLoS Med. 2024 Mar 15;21(3):e1004362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004362. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Associations of Diet with Health Outcomes in the UK Biobank: A Systematic Review.英国生物库中饮食与健康结果的关联:系统评价。
Nutrients. 2024 Feb 13;16(4):523. doi: 10.3390/nu16040523.
基于全基因组汇总统计数据,采用孟德尔随机化方法同时考虑相关和不相关的多效性效应。
Nat Genet. 2020 Jul;52(7):740-747. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0631-4. Epub 2020 May 25.
4
Fruits and vegetables and cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.水果和蔬菜与宫颈癌:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutr Cancer. 2021;73(1):62-74. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2020.1737151. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
5
Cancer statistics, 2020.癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
6
Within family Mendelian randomization studies.在家族性孟德尔随机化研究中。
Hum Mol Genet. 2019 Nov 21;28(R2):R170-R179. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddz204.
7
Dried fruit and public health - what does the evidence tell us?干水果与公共健康——现有证据告诉了我们什么?
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2019 Sep;70(6):675-687. doi: 10.1080/09637486.2019.1568398. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
8
The UK Biobank.英国生物银行
Nat Methods. 2018 Dec;15(12):1001. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0245-2.
9
A blueprint for cancer screening and early detection: Advancing screening's contribution to cancer control.癌症筛查和早期检测蓝图:提高筛查对癌症控制的贡献。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):50-79. doi: 10.3322/caac.21550. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
10
Identification of nine new susceptibility loci for endometrial cancer.鉴定出子宫内膜癌的 9 个新的易感性位点。
Nat Commun. 2018 Aug 9;9(1):3166. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05427-7.