Gilardi Fabrizio, Gessler Theresa, Kubli Maël, Müller Stefan
University of Zurich.
University College Dublin.
Schweiz Z Polit. 2021 Jun;27(2):243-256. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12458. Epub 2021 May 25.
We study the role of social media in debates regarding two policy responses to COVID-19 in Switzerland: face-mask rules and contact-tracing apps. We use a dictionary classifier to categorize 612'177 tweets by parties, politicians, and the public as well as 441'458 articles published in 76 newspapers between February and August 2020. We distinguish between "problem" (COVID-19) and "solutions" (face masks and contact-tracing apps) and, using a vector autoregression approach, we analyze the relationship between their salience on social and traditional media, as well as among different groups on social media. We find that overall attention to COVID-19 was not driven by endogenous dynamics between the different actors. By contrast, the debate on face masks was led by the attentive public and by politicians, whereas parties and newspapers followed. The results illustrate how social media challenge the capacity of party and media elites to craft a consensus regarding the appropriateness of different measures as responses to a major crisis.
我们研究了社交媒体在瑞士关于应对新冠疫情的两项政策举措(口罩规定和接触者追踪应用程序)的辩论中所起的作用。我们使用字典分类器,对2020年2月至8月期间政党、政治家和公众发布的612,177条推文以及76家报纸上发表的441,458篇文章进行分类。我们区分了“问题”(新冠疫情)和“解决方案”(口罩和接触者追踪应用程序),并采用向量自回归方法,分析了它们在社交媒体和传统媒体上的关注度之间的关系,以及社交媒体上不同群体之间的关注度关系。我们发现,对新冠疫情的总体关注并非由不同行为体之间的内生动态驱动。相比之下,关于口罩的辩论由关注此事的公众和政治家主导,而政党和报纸则是跟随者。研究结果表明,社交媒体如何挑战政党和媒体精英就不同措施作为应对重大危机的适当性达成共识的能力。