• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

企业通过使用动态目标产品简介将卫生技术评估/支付方观点纳入药物研发的挑战与机遇

Challenges and Opportunities for Companies to Build HTA/Payer Perspectives Into Drug Development Through the Use of a Dynamic Target Product Profile.

作者信息

Wang Ting, McAuslane Neil, Goettsch Wim G, Leufkens Hubert G M, De Bruin Marie L

机构信息

Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS), London, United Kingdom.

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 18;13:948161. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.948161. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2022.948161
PMID:35924050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9340272/
Abstract

The target product profile (TPP) outlines the desired profile of a target product aimed at a particular disease and is used by companies to plan clinical development. Considering the increasing importance of health technology assessment (HTA) in informing reimbursement decisions, a robust TPP needs to be built to address HTA needs, to guide an integrated evidence generation plan that will support HTA submissions. This study assessed current practices and experiences of companies in building HTA considerations into TPP development. An opinion survey was designed and conducted in 2019, as a cross-sectional questionnaire consisting of multiple-choice questions. The questionnaire provided a qualitative assessment of companies' strategies and experiences in building HTA considerations into the TPP. Eligible survey participants were the senior management of Global HTA/Market Access Departments at 18 top international pharmaceutical companies. 11 companies responded to the survey. All companies included HTA requirements in TPP development, but the timing and process varied. The key focus of HTA input related to health problems and treatment pathways, clinical efficacy/effectiveness, and safety. Variance of HTA methods and different value frameworks were identified as a challenge for development plans. Stakeholder engagement, such as HTA scientific advice, was used to pressure test the TPP. This research provides insight into current practice and potential opportunities for value-based drug development. It demonstrates the evolution of the TPP to encompass HTA requirements and suggests that the TPP could have a role as an iterative communication tool for use with HTA agencies to enhance an integrated evidence generation plan.

摘要

目标产品概况(TPP)概述了针对特定疾病的目标产品的理想概况,公司用其来规划临床开发。鉴于卫生技术评估(HTA)在为报销决策提供信息方面的重要性日益增加,需要构建一个完善的TPP来满足HTA需求,以指导一个将支持HTA申报的综合证据生成计划。本研究评估了公司在将HTA考量纳入TPP制定过程中的当前做法和经验。2019年设计并开展了一项意见调查,采用包含多项选择题的横断面问卷形式。该问卷对公司在将HTA考量纳入TPP方面的策略和经验进行了定性评估。符合条件的调查对象是18家顶级国际制药公司全球HTA/市场准入部门的高级管理人员。11家公司回复了调查。所有公司在TPP制定过程中都纳入了HTA要求,但时间安排和流程各不相同。HTA投入的关键重点涉及健康问题和治疗途径、临床疗效/有效性以及安全性。HTA方法的差异和不同的价值框架被确定为开发计划面临的一项挑战。利益相关者参与,如HTA科学建议,被用于对TPP进行压力测试。本研究为基于价值的药物开发的当前实践和潜在机会提供了见解。它展示了TPP的演变,以涵盖HTA要求,并表明TPP可作为一种迭代沟通工具,与HTA机构配合使用,以完善综合证据生成计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ed/9340272/3922a187d70a/fphar-13-948161-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ed/9340272/14baf4cfd32b/fphar-13-948161-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ed/9340272/07f89eda3930/fphar-13-948161-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ed/9340272/964c57e18ea0/fphar-13-948161-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ed/9340272/3922a187d70a/fphar-13-948161-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ed/9340272/14baf4cfd32b/fphar-13-948161-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ed/9340272/07f89eda3930/fphar-13-948161-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ed/9340272/964c57e18ea0/fphar-13-948161-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ed/9340272/3922a187d70a/fphar-13-948161-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Challenges and Opportunities for Companies to Build HTA/Payer Perspectives Into Drug Development Through the Use of a Dynamic Target Product Profile.企业通过使用动态目标产品简介将卫生技术评估/支付方观点纳入药物研发的挑战与机遇
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 18;13:948161. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.948161. eCollection 2022.
2
Companies' Health Technology Assessment Strategies and Practices in Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy and Spain: An Industry Metrics Study.澳大利亚、加拿大、英国、法国、德国、意大利和西班牙企业的健康技术评估策略与实践:一项行业指标研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Dec 3;11:594549. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.594549. eCollection 2020.
3
Regulatory, health technology assessment and company interactions: the current landscape and future ecosystem for drug development, review and reimbursement.监管、卫生技术评估与企业互动:药物研发、审评与支付的现状与未来生态系统
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Apr 11;39(1):e20. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000144.
4
Building Synergy between Regulatory and HTA Agencies beyond Processes and Procedures-Can We Effectively Align the Evidentiary Requirements? A Survey of Stakeholder Perceptions.监管机构和卫生技术评估机构之间的协同作用建设超越流程和程序——我们能否有效地调整证据要求?利益相关者认知调查。
Value Health. 2018 Jun;21(6):707-714. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
5
Building HTA insights into the drug development plan: Current approaches to seeking early scientific advice from HTA agencies.将 HTA 洞察融入药物开发计划:寻求 HTA 机构早期科学建议的当前方法。
Drug Discov Today. 2022 Jan;27(1):347-353. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.09.014. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
6
The role of health technology assessment bodies in shaping drug development.卫生技术评估机构在塑造药物研发过程中的作用。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2014 Nov 10;8:2273-81. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S49935. eCollection 2014.
7
Timely, consistent, transparent assessment of market access evidence: implementing tools based on the HTA Core Model® in a pharmaceutical company.及时、一致、透明地评估市场准入证据:在制药公司中实施基于 HTA 核心模型®的工具。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019 Jan;35(1):10-16. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318003653. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
8
Patient advocate perspectives on involvement in HTA: an international snapshot.患者权益倡导者对参与卫生技术评估的看法:国际概览
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Jan 10;3:2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0052-9. eCollection 2017.
9
Health technology assessment of medicines in Greece: pharmaceutical industry executives' views.希腊药品的卫生技术评估:制药行业高管的观点
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Apr;30(2):226-32. doi: 10.1017/S0266462314000130. Epub 2014 May 7.
10
Patient advocacy group involvement in health technology assessments: an observational study.患者权益倡导组织参与卫生技术评估:一项观察性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Nov 25;7(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00327-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Incorporating Patient Input into the Target Product Profile.将患者意见纳入目标产品简介。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00783-1.
2
Preserving the brain: forum on neurodegenerative diseases.保护大脑:神经退行性疾病论坛
Neurol Sci. 2023 Jul;44(7):2613-2616. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06721-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Building HTA insights into the drug development plan: Current approaches to seeking early scientific advice from HTA agencies.将 HTA 洞察融入药物开发计划:寻求 HTA 机构早期科学建议的当前方法。
Drug Discov Today. 2022 Jan;27(1):347-353. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.09.014. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
2
The FDA's patient-focused drug development initiative.美国食品药品监督管理局以患者为中心的药物研发倡议。
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2021 Feb;19(2):70-72.
3
Companies' Health Technology Assessment Strategies and Practices in Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy and Spain: An Industry Metrics Study.
澳大利亚、加拿大、英国、法国、德国、意大利和西班牙企业的健康技术评估策略与实践:一项行业指标研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Dec 3;11:594549. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.594549. eCollection 2020.
4
ICER Value Framework 2020 Update: Recommendations on the Aggregation of Benefits and Contextual Considerations.2020 年 ICER 价值框架更新:关于获益聚合和背景因素考量的建议。
Value Health. 2020 Aug;23(8):1040-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.1828. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
5
Review of Relative effectiveness assessments (REAs) of pharmaceuticals at the European network for health technology assessment (EUnetHTA): A first step towards a consolidated European perspective on comparative effectiveness & safety?药品相对效果评估(REAs)在欧洲卫生技术评估网络(EUnetHTA)中的评价:迈向比较有效性和安全性的欧洲统一视角的第一步?
Health Policy. 2020 Sep;124(9):943-951. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
6
The new definition of health technology assessment: A milestone in international collaboration.新的健康技术评估定义:国际合作的里程碑。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Jun;36(3):187-190. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000215. Epub 2020 May 13.
7
Unmet Medical Need: An Introduction to Definitions and Stakeholder Perceptions.未满足的医学需求:定义和利益相关者认知简介。
Value Health. 2019 Nov;22(11):1275-1282. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
8
Patient-centered drug development and the Learning Health System.以患者为中心的药物研发与学习型健康系统。
Learn Health Syst. 2017 Jun 6;1(3):e10027. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10027. eCollection 2017 Jul.
9
Timely, consistent, transparent assessment of market access evidence: implementing tools based on the HTA Core Model® in a pharmaceutical company.及时、一致、透明地评估市场准入证据:在制药公司中实施基于 HTA 核心模型®的工具。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019 Jan;35(1):10-16. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318003653. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
10
IS THE EUNETHTA HTA CORE MODEL® FIT FOR PURPOSE? EVALUATION FROM AN INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE.Eunetta HTA 核心模型®是否适用?来自行业视角的评估。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(5):458-463. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000594. Epub 2018 Oct 18.