• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Does endovascular duration impact clinical outcomes in aortic arch repair? The RELAY™ branched international stance.血管内治疗持续时间对主动脉弓修复的临床结果有影响吗?RELAY™分支型国际立场。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 18;9:969858. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.969858. eCollection 2022.
2
Favorable neurological outcomes in thoracic endovascular aortic repair with RELAY™ branched-An international perspective.胸主动脉腔内修复术联合 RELAY™分支型覆膜支架的良好神经结局:国际视角。
J Card Surg. 2022 Nov;37(11):3556-3563. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16957. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
3
RELAY Branched-International Results of Vessel Patency and Reintervention.RELAY研究:血管通畅性和再次干预的国际分支研究结果
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 29;9:962884. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.962884. eCollection 2022.
4
RELAY™ Branched device: The story of an aortic arch device.RELAY™分支型器械:一个主动脉弓器械的故事。
J Card Surg. 2022 Nov;37(11):3564-3566. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16958. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
5
International RELAY, branched outcomes - designed to respect and repair the thoracic aorta: A comparative analysis between double and triple branched configurations.国际接力研究,分支结果——旨在修复胸主动脉:双分支与三分支构型的比较分析
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2023 Sep;31(7):624-632. doi: 10.1177/02184923231160697. Epub 2023 Jun 4.
6
From the RELAY Family-A Story of Single-Branched International Outcomes.从 RELAY 家族到单支国际结局的故事。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Aug;94:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.09.040. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
7
Driving Technology for Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: An International Analysis of Single-versus Double-Branch RELAY Outcomes.胸主动脉腔内修复术的驱动技术:单分支与双分支 RELAY 结果的国际分析。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Aug;94:80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
8
Endovascular aortic arch repair: A comparison of outcomes and current trends.血管内主动脉弓修复术:结果比较与当前趋势
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2023 Sep;31(7):589-595. doi: 10.1177/02184923221140756. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
9
Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) in the management of aortic arch pathology.胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)在主动脉弓病变治疗中的应用
Ann Vasc Surg. 2012 Jan;26(1):55-66. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.08.009.
10
Endovascular treatment of the dissected proximal aortic arch: a systematic review.主动脉弓近端夹层的血管内治疗:一项系统评价
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Oct 29;33(5):746-754. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab161.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal size of Frozenix for true thoracic aneurysms: is downsizing an option?用于真性胸主动脉瘤的Frozenix的最佳尺寸:缩小尺寸是一种选择吗?
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Apr;73(4):218-226. doi: 10.1007/s11748-024-02074-2. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
2
Branched and Fenestrated Aortic Endovascular Grafts.分支型和开窗型主动脉血管内移植物。
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2023 Mar 7;19(2):15-23. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1200. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Alternative management of proximal aortic dissection: concept and application.近端主动脉夹层的替代治疗:概念与应用
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Apr;38(Suppl 1):183-192. doi: 10.1007/s12055-021-01281-3. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
2
What Is the Long-Term Clinical Efficacy of the Thoraflex™ Hybrid Prosthesis for Aortic Arch Repair?Thoraflex™ 混合人工血管用于主动脉弓修复的长期临床疗效如何?
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 22;9:842165. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.842165. eCollection 2022.
3
Duration of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest for aortic arch surgery: is it a myth, fiction, or scientific leap?主动脉弓手术中深低温停循环时间:是一个神话、虚构,还是科学飞跃?
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2022 Jun;63(3):243-253. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12275-5. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
4
Results of endovascular aortic arch repair using the Relay Branch system.使用 Relay Branch 系统进行的主动脉弓腔内修复的结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Sep 11;60(3):662-668. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab160.
5
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Arch Aneurysms with the Najuta Thoracic Stent-Graft System.使用Najuta胸主动脉覆膜支架系统治疗弓部动脉瘤的胸主动脉腔内修复术的长期临床结果
Ann Vasc Dis. 2020 Dec 25;13(4):384-389. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.20-00102.
6
Orthotopic branched endovascular aortic arch repair in patients who cannot undergo classical surgery.无法接受传统手术的患者的原位分支血管腔内主动脉弓修复术。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 May 1;53(5):1007-1012. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx493.
7
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with branched Inoue Stent Graft for arch aortic aneurysms.使用分支型井上覆膜支架进行胸主动脉腔内修复治疗主动脉弓部动脉瘤。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1340-1348.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.03.432. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
8
Left subclavian artery revascularization in zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair is associated with lower stroke risk across all aortic diseases.在2区胸段血管腔内主动脉修复术中,左锁骨下动脉血运重建与所有主动脉疾病的较低中风风险相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 May;65(5):1270-1279. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.10.111. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
9
Reintervention after endovascular repair for aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.主动脉夹层血管内修复术后再次干预:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Nov;152(5):1279-1288.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.06.027. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
10
Type A aortic dissection with arch entry tear: Surgical experience in 104 patients over a 12-year period.伴有主动脉弓入口撕裂的A型主动脉夹层:12年间104例患者的手术经验
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jun;151(6):1581-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.11.056. Epub 2015 Dec 13.

血管内治疗持续时间对主动脉弓修复的临床结果有影响吗?RELAY™分支型国际立场。

Does endovascular duration impact clinical outcomes in aortic arch repair? The RELAY™ branched international stance.

作者信息

Tan Sven Z C P, Surkhi Abedalaziz O, Jubouri Matti, Bailey Damian M, Williams Ian M, Bashir Mohamad

机构信息

Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Faculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 18;9:969858. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.969858. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2022.969858
PMID:35924217
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9339619/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The high mortality and morbidity rates in surgical aortic arch repair are a barrier to therapy for a considerable proportion of patients with aortic arch aneurysm or dissection. There is hence a demand for the development and adoption of a minimally invasive alternative to aortic arch repair, such as thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Procedural duration is a key factor in the pathogenesis of complications in surgical aortic arch repair. Herein, we evaluate whether endovascular duration impacts neurological outcomes, target vessel patency, and reintervention rates in aortic arch TEVAR with RELAY™ Branched (Terumo Aortic, Inchinnan, UK), which is specifically developed for on-label use within the aortic arch.

METHODS

Prospective data was collected between January 2019 and January 2022 on the clinical outcomes of TEVAR for aortic arch dissection and aneurysm with RELAY™ single-, double-, and triple branched endoprostheses from centers across Europe. They were then retrospectively analyzed with descriptive and distributive analysis. Follow-up data on the incidence of disabling stroke (DS), target vessel patency, and reintervention from 30 days and 6-, 12-, and 24 months postoperative was included in the analysis.

RESULTS

147 (99.3%) of all 148 cases were successful. Over the 24 month follow-up period, in total 6 (4.1%) patients suffered DS, 24 (16.3%) required reintervention, and target vessel patency was exhibited in 118 (80.2%) patients. The modal endovascular duration was 100-150 min (in 64.6%, = 95 cases). Analysis revealed that endovascular duration was associated with a lower likelihood of reintervention at 30 days, 6-, and 12 months ( = 0.011, = 0.019, = 0.037), a greater likelihood of target vessel patency at 6- and 24 months ( = 0.032, = 0.035). No relationship between endovascular duration and DS was revealed.

DISCUSSION

The data demonstrates that RELAY™ Branched is associated with promising clinical outcomes for on-label aortic arch TEVAR. The underlying mechanism linking endovascular duration and reintervention rates, or target vessel patency is likely multifactorial and complex. Given that TEVAR is carried out under general anesthetic only, it is unlikely that prolonged procedural duration has any major effect over neurological outcomes for arch TEVAR.

摘要

背景

外科主动脉弓修复术的高死亡率和发病率是相当一部分主动脉弓瘤或夹层患者治疗的障碍。因此,需要开发并采用一种微创的主动脉弓修复替代方法,如胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)。手术持续时间是外科主动脉弓修复术中并发症发病机制的关键因素。在此,我们评估血管内手术持续时间是否会影响使用专门为主动脉弓内标签使用而开发的RELAY™分支(泰尔茂主动脉,英国因钦南)进行主动脉弓TEVAR时的神经学结果、靶血管通畅率和再次干预率。

方法

收集了2019年1月至2022年1月期间欧洲各中心使用RELAY™单分支、双分支和三分支血管内支架进行主动脉弓夹层和动脉瘤TEVAR的临床结果的前瞻性数据。然后对其进行回顾性分析,包括描述性和分布性分析。分析纳入了术后30天以及6个月、12个月和24个月时致残性卒中(DS)发生率、靶血管通畅率和再次干预的随访数据。

结果

148例病例中的147例(99.3%)手术成功。在24个月的随访期内,共有6例(4.1%)患者发生DS,24例(16.3%)需要再次干预,118例(80.2%)患者的靶血管保持通畅。血管内手术持续时间的众数为100 - 150分钟(占64.6%,n = 95例)。分析显示,血管内手术持续时间与术后30天、6个月和12个月时再次干预的可能性较低相关(P = 0.011、P = 0.019、P = 0.037),与术后6个月和24个月时靶血管通畅的可能性较高相关(P = 0.032、P = 0.035)。未发现血管内手术持续时间与DS之间存在关联。

讨论

数据表明,RELAY™分支在主动脉弓TEVAR标签内使用时具有良好的临床结果。血管内手术持续时间与再次干预率或靶血管通畅率之间的潜在机制可能是多因素且复杂的。鉴于TEVAR仅在全身麻醉下进行,手术持续时间延长不太可能对主动脉弓TEVAR的神经学结果产生任何重大影响。