Scherer Michael, Al-Haj Husain Nadin, Barmak Abdul B, Kois John C, Özcan Mutlu, Revilla-León Marta
School of Dentistry, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA.
Private Practice, Sonora, CA.
J Prosthodont. 2023 Apr;32(S1):68-73. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13582. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
To measure the flexural strength and Weibull characteristics of aged and nonaged printed interim dental material fabricated with different layer thickness.
Bars (25×2×2 mm) were additively fabricated by using a polymer printer (Asiga Max) and an interim resin (Nexdent C&B MFH). Specimens were fabricated with the same printing parameters and postprocessing procedures, but with 7 different layer thickness: 50 (control or 50-G group), 10 (10-G group), 25 (25-G group), 75 (75-G group), 100 (100-G group), 125 (125-G group), and 150 μm (150-G group). Two subgroups were created: nonaged and aged subgroups (n = 10). A universal testing machine was selected to measure flexural strength. Two-parameter Weibull distribution values were computed. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests were selected for statistical evaluation of the data (α = 0.05).
Artificial aging methods (p < 0.001) were a significant predictor of the flexural strength computed. Aged specimens acquired less flexural strength than nonaged specimens. The Weibull distribution obtained the highest shape for nonaged 50-G and 75-G group specimens compared with those of other nonaged groups, while the Weibull distribution showed the highest shape for aged 125-G specimens.
The flexural strength of the additively fabricated interim material examined was not influenced by the layer thickness at which the specimens were fabricated; however, artificial aging techniques reduced its flexural strength. Aged specimens presented lower Weibull distribution values compared with nonaged specimens, except for the 125-G specimens.
测量不同层厚的老化和未老化的打印临时牙科材料的弯曲强度和威布尔特性。
使用聚合物打印机(Asiga Max)和临时树脂(Nexdent C&B MFH)增材制造出尺寸为25×2×2毫米的棒材。所有试样均采用相同的打印参数和后处理程序,但层厚有7种不同规格:50(对照组或50-G组)、10(10-G组)、25(25-G组)、75(75-G组)、100(100-G组)、125(125-G组)和150微米(150-G组)。分为两个亚组:未老化亚组和老化亚组(每组n = 10)。选用万能试验机测量弯曲强度。计算双参数威布尔分布值。选用双向方差分析和Tukey检验对数据进行统计学评估(α = 0.05)。
人工老化方法(p < 0.001)是计算所得弯曲强度的显著预测因素。老化试样的弯曲强度低于未老化试样。与其他未老化组相比,未老化的50-G组和75-G组试样的威布尔分布形状最高,而老化的125-G试样的威布尔分布形状最高。
所检测的增材制造临时材料的弯曲强度不受试样制造时层厚的影响;然而,人工老化技术降低了其弯曲强度。与未老化试样相比,除125-G试样外,老化试样的威布尔分布值较低。