7938University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
1349Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada.
Healthc Manage Forum. 2023 Jan;36(1):36-41. doi: 10.1177/08404704221112286. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
This article has three aims. First, to reflect on how conceptualizations of the public interest may have shifted due to COVID-19. Second, to focus on the implications of regulatory responses for the health workforce and corresponding lessons as health leaders and systems transition from pandemic response to pandemic recovery. Third, to identify how these lessons lead to potential directions for future research, connecting regulation in a whole-of-systems approach to health system safety and health workforce capacity and sustainability. Pandemic regulatory responses highlighted both strengths and limitations of regulatory structures and frameworks. The COVID-19 pandemic may have introduced new considerations around regulating in the public interest, particularly as the impact of regulatory responses on the health workforce continues to be examined. Clearly articulating practitioner practice parameters, reducing barriers to practice, and working collaboratively with stakeholders were primary aspects of regulators' pandemic responses that impacted the health workforce.
本文有三个目标。首先,反思由于 COVID-19,公众利益的概念可能发生了怎样的转变。其次,关注监管应对措施对卫生人力的影响,以及随着卫生领导人和系统从大流行病应对过渡到大流行病恢复,这些应对措施带来的相应经验教训。第三,确定这些经验教训如何为未来的研究指明方向,将整个系统方法中的监管与卫生系统安全以及卫生人力能力和可持续性联系起来。大流行病的监管应对措施突出了监管结构和框架的优势和局限性。COVID-19 大流行可能带来了围绕公共利益监管的新考虑因素,尤其是随着对监管应对措施对卫生人力的影响的持续研究。明确阐述从业者的实践参数、减少实践障碍以及与利益相关者合作是监管机构大流行病应对措施对卫生人力产生影响的主要方面。