Mind, Brain & Behavior Research Center, University of Granada, Spain; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Granada, Spain.
Mind, Brain & Behavior Research Center, University of Granada, Spain; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Granada, Spain.
Cortex. 2022 Sep;154:348-364. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
Flow state is a subjective experience that people report when task performance is experienced as automatic, intrinsically rewarding, optimal and effortless. While this intriguing phenomenon is the subject of a plethora of behavioural studies, only recently researchers have started to look at its neural correlates. Here, we aim to systematically and critically review the existing literature on the neural correlates of the flow state.
Three electronic databases (Web of Science, Scopus and PsycINFO) were searched to acquire information on eligible articles in July, 2021, and updated in March, 2022. Studies that measured or manipulated flow state (through questionnaires or employing experimental paradigms) and recorded associated brain activity with electroencephalography (EEG), functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) or functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) or manipulated brain activity with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) were selected. We used the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool to assess the methodological quality of eligible records.
In total, 25 studies were included, which involved 471 participants. In general, the studies that experimentally addressed flow state and its neural dynamics seem to converge on the key role of structures linked to attention, executive function and reward systems, giving to the anterior brain areas (e.g., the DLPC, MPFC, IFG) a crucial role in the experience of flow. However, the dynamics of these brain regions during flow state are inconsistent across studies.
In light of the results, we conclude that the current available evidence is sparse and inconclusive, which limits any theoretical debate. We also outline major limitations of this literature (the small number of studies, the high heterogeneity across them and their important methodological constraints) and highlight several aspects regarding experimental design and flow measurements that may provide useful avenues for future studies on this topic.
流畅状态是一种人们在任务表现被体验为自动、内在奖励、最佳和毫不费力时报告的主观体验。虽然这一有趣的现象是大量行为研究的主题,但最近研究人员才开始研究其神经相关性。在这里,我们旨在系统地和批判性地回顾关于流畅状态的神经相关性的现有文献。
我们于 2021 年 7 月在三个电子数据库(Web of Science、Scopus 和 PsycINFO)中搜索了有关合格文章的信息,并于 2022 年 3 月进行了更新。选择了测量或操纵流畅状态(通过问卷或采用实验范式)并记录与脑电图(EEG)、功能磁共振(fMRI)或功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)相关的大脑活动或用经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)操纵大脑活动的研究。我们使用 Cochrane 协作风险偏倚 2(RoB 2)工具评估合格记录的方法学质量。
总共纳入了 25 项研究,涉及 471 名参与者。总的来说,那些旨在从实验上解决流畅状态及其神经动力学的研究似乎都集中在与注意力、执行功能和奖励系统相关的结构的关键作用上,赋予了前脑区域(例如,DLPC、MPFC、IFG)在流畅体验中的关键作用。然而,这些脑区在流畅状态下的动力学在不同的研究中是不一致的。
根据结果,我们得出结论,目前的证据是稀疏和不确定的,这限制了任何理论上的争论。我们还概述了这一文献的主要局限性(研究数量少、它们之间的高度异质性以及它们的重要方法学限制),并强调了实验设计和流畅度测量方面的几个方面,这些方面可能为未来这一主题的研究提供有用的途径。