• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
'In the picture': perspectives on living and working with cancer.《画面中》:癌症患者的生活与工作感悟
Med Humanit. 2023 Mar;49(1):83-92. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2022-012392. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
2
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.当前在英格兰促进获取数字国民保健服务初级保健服务的经验和未来潜力:Di-Facto 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(32):1-197. doi: 10.3310/JKYT5803.
3
Everyday comforting practices in psychiatric hospital environments: A design anthropology approach.日常安慰实践在精神病院环境中:一种设计人类学方法。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Aug;28(4):644-655. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12711. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
4
Qualitative Study定性研究
5
Improving support and planning ahead for older people with learning disabilities and family carers: a mixed-methods study.改善对有学习障碍的老年人及其家庭照顾者的支持与提前规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jun;12(16):1-161. doi: 10.3310/MTHW2644.
6
'Socialised care futility' in the care of older people in hospital who call out repetitively: An ethnographic study.医院中反复呼叫的老年人的“社会化护理无效”:一项民族志研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Jul;107:103589. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103589. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
7
Stratified, precision or personalised medicine? Cancer services in the 'real world' of a London hospital.分层医疗、精准医疗还是个性化医疗?伦敦一家医院“现实世界”中的癌症服务。
Sociol Health Illn. 2017 Jan;39(1):143-158. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12457. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
8
Digital First Primary Care for those with multiple long-term conditions: a rapid review of the views of stakeholders.针对多种慢性病患者的数字优先初级保健:利益相关者观点的快速综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(21):1-68. doi: 10.3310/AWBT4827.
9
Ecologising Invited and Uninvited Patient Participation in Russia.俄罗斯的有邀请和无邀请的患者参与的生态化
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14150. doi: 10.1111/hex.14150.
10
The 'weekend effect' in acute medicine: a protocol for a team-based ethnography of weekend care for medical patients in acute hospital settings.急性医学中的“周末效应”:急性医院环境中医疗患者周末护理的基于团队的民族志研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 5;7(4):e016755. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016755.

本文引用的文献

1
Personalization: a new political arithmetic?个性化:一种新的政治算术?
Distinktion. 2023 Jan 4;24(2):167-194. doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2022.2098352. eCollection 2023.
2
Personalising clinical pathways in a London breast cancer service.个性化伦敦乳腺癌服务中的临床路径。
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Mar;44(3):624-640. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13441. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
3
The rationales for and challenges with employing arts-based health services research (ABHSR): a qualitative systematic review of primary studies.基于艺术的健康服务研究(ABHSR)的理由和挑战:对主要研究的定性系统评价。
Med Humanit. 2021 Sep;47(3):266-273. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2020-011845. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
4
Bringing narratives from physicians, patients and caregivers together: a scoping review of published research.将医生、患者和护理人员的叙述汇集在一起:已发表研究的范围综述。
Med Humanit. 2021 Mar;47(1):27-37. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2017-011424. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
5
Beyond the binaries: reshaping pain communication through arts workshops.超越二元对立:通过艺术工作坊重塑疼痛交流
Sociol Health Illn. 2018 Mar;40(3):577-592. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12669. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
6
Messy entanglements: research assemblages in heart transplantation discourses and practices.混乱的纠葛:心脏移植话语与实践中的研究组合
Med Humanit. 2018 Mar;44(1):46-54. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2017-011212. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
7
Stratified, precision or personalised medicine? Cancer services in the 'real world' of a London hospital.分层医疗、精准医疗还是个性化医疗?伦敦一家医院“现实世界”中的癌症服务。
Sociol Health Illn. 2017 Jan;39(1):143-158. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12457. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
8
The effects of cancer research participation on patient experience: a mixed-methods analysis.癌症研究参与对患者体验的影响:一项混合方法分析。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016 Nov;25(6):1056-1064. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12336. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
9
Critical medical humanities: embracing entanglement, taking risks.关键医学人文学科:拥抱交织,勇于冒险。
Med Humanit. 2015 Jun;41(1):2-7. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2015-010692.
10
The connection between art, healing, and public health: a review of current literature.艺术、治疗与公共卫生之间的关系:当前文献回顾。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Feb;100(2):254-63. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.156497. Epub 2009 Dec 17.

《画面中》:癌症患者的生活与工作感悟

'In the picture': perspectives on living and working with cancer.

机构信息

Anthropology, Goldsmiths University of London, London, UK

Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.

出版信息

Med Humanit. 2023 Mar;49(1):83-92. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2022-012392. Epub 2022 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1136/medhum-2022-012392
PMID:35927002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9985730/
Abstract

We explored working and living with cancer at a large research-intensive National Health Service hospital breast cancer service and adjoining non-governmental organisation (NGO). The project had three elements that were largely autonomous in practice but conceptually integrated through a focus on personalised cancer medicine. Di Sherlock held conversations with staff and patients from which she produced a collection of poems, At the same time, we conducted interviews and observation in the hospital, and hosted a public series of science cafés in the NGO. The trajectory of this project was not predetermined, but we found that the poetry residency provided a context for viewing participation in experimental cancer care and vice versa. Taking themes from the poetry practice, we show how they revealed categories of relevance to participants and illuminated others that circulated in the hospital and NGO. Reciprocally, turning to findings from long-term ethnographic research with patients, we show that their observations were not only representations but also tools for navigating life in waiting with cancer. The categories that we discovered and assembled about living and working with cancer do not readily combine into an encompassing picture, we argue, but instead provide alternating perspectives. Through analysis of different forms of research participation, we hope to contribute to an understanding of how categories are made, recognised and inhabited through situated comparisons. In personalised medicine, category-making is enabled if not dependent on increasingly intensive computation and so the practices seem far removed from mundane processes of interaction. Yet, we emphasise connections with everyday practices, in which people categorise themselves and others routinely according to what they like and resemble.

摘要

我们在一家大型研究型国民保健服务医院的乳腺癌服务处和毗邻的非政府组织(非政府组织)探索了与癌症一起工作和生活。该项目有三个要素,在实践中基本是自主的,但通过关注个性化癌症医学在概念上是整合的。Di Sherlock 与员工和患者进行了交谈,从中创作了一系列诗歌。与此同时,我们在医院进行了访谈和观察,并在非政府组织举办了一系列公开的科学咖啡馆。该项目的轨迹并非预先确定,但我们发现诗歌驻地为观察实验性癌症护理的参与以及反之亦然提供了一个背景。从诗歌实践中选取主题,我们展示了它们如何揭示与参与者相关的类别,并阐明了在医院和非政府组织中流传的其他类别。反过来,我们转向与患者进行长期民族志研究的发现,表明他们的观察不仅是代表性的,而且是在等待癌症时驾驭生活的工具。我们发现并组合的关于与癌症一起生活和工作的类别不容易组合成一个全面的画面,我们认为,而是提供了交替的视角。通过对不同形式的研究参与的分析,我们希望有助于理解类别是如何通过情境比较来形成、识别和居住的。在个性化医学中,如果不是依赖于越来越密集的计算,那么类别制作就成为可能,因此这些实践似乎与日常的互动过程相去甚远。然而,我们强调与日常实践的联系,人们根据自己的喜好和相似之处,常规地对自己和他人进行分类。