Neighbors Harold W, Mattingly Delvon T, Johnson Janay, Morse Kayla
Department of Social, Behavioral, and Population Sciences, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal St, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 4810, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jan;316:115209. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115209. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
Thirty-seven years ago, the Secretary's Task Force on Black and Minority Health called attention to a "national paradox" of persistent Black-White health disparities despite overall health improvements for the nation (HHS, 1985). Subsequent updates to the "Heckler Report" came to the same conclusion; Black Americans continued to exhibit poorer health in comparison to White Americans (Satcher et al., 2005). Current population health statistics demonstrate Black-White health disparities comparable to 1985 (AHRQ, 2018; Shiels et al., 2021; Wall et al., 2018). Although psychological, behavioral, social, and economic factors all contribute to Black-White differences in health, there is a noticeable increase in discussions about the importance of systemic racism in producing racial health disparities. This article addresses three questions relevant to research on racism and the health of Black Americans: (1) Why has academic public health research on racism failed to reduce racial health disparities? (2) What can academic public health scientists do differently to reduce the impact of systemic racism on inequities among Black and White Americans? (3) What can Black Americans do in the face of present-day anti-Black systemic racism? We argue that to convert the vision of health equity into a visible reality, health equity research scientists must move beyond discussion, observation, and description. We also argue that to demonstrate progress in reducing racial health disparities, health equity scientists will need to work much more directly on eradicating racism as a fundamental cause of health differences between Black and White Americans. As scientists, the challenge we face is how to accomplish this mission without leaving the realm of science. Racism is a social determinant of Black health and social determinants are political problems. Political problems require political solutions.
37年前,秘书办公室的黑人和少数族裔健康问题特别工作组提请人们注意一个“国家悖论”:尽管全国整体健康状况有所改善,但黑人和白人之间的健康差距依然存在(美国卫生与公众服务部,1985年)。随后对《赫克勒报告》的更新也得出了同样的结论;与美国白人相比,美国黑人的健康状况仍然较差(萨切尔等人,2005年)。当前的人口健康统计数据显示,黑人和白人之间的健康差距与1985年相当(美国医疗保健研究与质量局,2018年;希尔兹等人,2021年;沃尔等人,2018年)。虽然心理、行为、社会和经济因素都导致了黑人和白人在健康方面的差异,但关于系统性种族主义在造成种族健康差距方面的重要性的讨论明显增多。本文探讨了与种族主义和美国黑人健康研究相关的三个问题:(1)为什么关于种族主义的学术公共卫生研究未能缩小种族健康差距?(2)学术公共卫生科学家可以采取哪些不同的做法来减少系统性种族主义对美国黑人和白人之间不平等的影响?(3)面对当今反黑人的系统性种族主义,美国黑人可以做些什么?我们认为,为了将健康公平的愿景转化为可见的现实,健康公平研究科学家必须超越讨论、观察和描述。我们还认为,为了在减少种族健康差距方面取得进展,健康公平科学家将需要更直接地致力于消除种族主义,因为种族主义是美国黑人和白人健康差异的根本原因。作为科学家,我们面临的挑战是如何在不脱离科学领域的情况下完成这项任务。种族主义是黑人健康的社会决定因素,而社会决定因素是政治问题。政治问题需要政治解决方案。