National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
VCU Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center, 417 N 11th St., Richmond, VA 23219, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 10;20(22):7049. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20227049.
Multiple evidence-based interventions (EBIs) have been developed to improve the completion of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening within Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and other safety net settings in marginalized communities. Little effort has been made, however, to evaluate their relative effectiveness across different clinical contexts and populations. To this end, we tested the relative effectiveness of three EBIs (mailed birthday cards, lay navigation, and provider-delivered education) among a convenience sample of 1252 patients (aged 50-75 years old, who were due for CRC screening and scheduled for a visit at one of three clinics within a network of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) in the United States. To be eligible for the study, patients had to identify as African American (AA) or Latino American (LA). We compared the effects of the three EBIs on CRC screening completion using logistic regression. Overall, 20% of the study population, an increase from a baseline of 13%, completed CRC screening. Clinical demographics appeared to influence the effectiveness of the EBIs. Mailed birthday reminders appeared to be the most effective within the multi-ethnic clinic ( = 0.03), provider-delivered education within the predominantly LA clinic ( = 0.02), and lay navigation within the predominantly AA clinic ( = 0.03). These findings highlight the importance of understanding clinical context when selecting which evidence-based interventions to deploy.
已经开发了多种基于证据的干预措施 (EBIs),以提高在合格联邦卫生中心 (FQHC) 和边缘化社区其他安全网环境中完成结直肠癌 (CRC) 筛查的比例。然而,很少有人努力评估它们在不同临床环境和人群中的相对效果。为此,我们在一个便利样本的 1252 名患者(年龄在 50-75 岁之间,应进行 CRC 筛查并在合格联邦卫生中心网络内的三个诊所之一就诊)中测试了三种 EBI(邮寄生日贺卡、非专业人士导航和提供者提供的教育)的相对有效性。为了符合研究条件,患者必须自认为是非裔美国人 (AA) 或拉丁裔美国人 (LA)。我们使用逻辑回归比较了三种 EBI 对 CRC 筛查完成的影响。总体而言,研究人群中有 20%(比基线的 13%有所增加)完成了 CRC 筛查。临床人口统计学似乎影响了 EBI 的效果。邮寄生日提醒在多族裔诊所中似乎最有效(=0.03),提供者提供的教育在主要是 LA 的诊所中最有效(=0.02),非专业人士导航在主要是 AA 的诊所中最有效(=0.03)。这些发现强调了在选择要部署的基于证据的干预措施时了解临床背景的重要性。