• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用接触网络估计医院潜在病原体风险暴露。

Use of Contact Networks to Estimate Potential Pathogen Risk Exposure in Hospitals.

机构信息

School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, Pullman.

Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2225508. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25508.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25508
PMID:35930285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9356318/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Person-to-person contact is important for the transmission of health care-associated pathogens. Quantifying these contact patterns is crucial for modeling disease transmission and understanding routes of potential transmission.

OBJECTIVE

To generate and analyze the mixing matrices of hospital patients based on their contacts within hospital units.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this quality improvement study, mixing matrices were created using a weighted contact network of connected hospital patients, in which contact was defined as occupying the same hospital unit for 1 day. Participants included hospitalized patients at 299 hospital units in 24 hospitals in the Southeastern United States that were part of the Duke Antimicrobial Stewardship Outreach Network between January 2015 and December 2017. Analysis was conducted between October 2021 and February 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The mixing matrices of patients for each hospital unit were assessed using age, Elixhauser Score, and a measure of antibiotic exposure.

RESULTS

Among 1 549 413 hospitalized patients (median [IQR] age, 44 [26-63] years; 883 580 [56.3%] women) in 299 hospital units, some units had highly similar patterns across multiple hospitals, although the number of patients varied to a great extent. For most of the adult inpatient units, frequent mixing was observed for older adult groups, while outpatient units (eg, emergency departments and behavioral health units) showed mixing between different age groups. Most units mixing patterns followed the marginal distribution of age; however, patients aged 90 years or older with longer lengths of stay created a secondary peak in some medical wards. From the mixing matrices by Elixhauser Score, mixing between patients with relatively higher comorbidity index was observed in intensive care units. Mixing matrices by antibiotic spectrum, a 4-point scale based on priority for antibiotic stewardship programs, resulted in 6 major distinct patterns owing to the variation of the type of antibiotics used in different units, namely those dominated by a single antibiotic spectrum (narrow, broad, or extended), 1 pattern spanning all antibiotic spectrum types and 2 forms of narrow- and extended-spectrum dominant exposure patterns (an emergency room where patients were exposed to one type of antibiotic or the other and a pediatric ward where patients were exposed to both types).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This quality improvement study found that the mixing patterns of patients both within and between hospitals followed broadly expected patterns, although with a considerable amount of heterogeneity. These patterns could be used to inform mathematical models of health care-associated infections, assess the appropriateness of both models and policies for smaller community hospitals, and provide baseline information for the design of interventions that rely on altering patient contact patterns, such as practices for transferring patients within hospitals.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91d/9356318/ae979c1e1814/jamanetwopen-e2225508-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91d/9356318/2b97386ca0f2/jamanetwopen-e2225508-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91d/9356318/fee470ca9147/jamanetwopen-e2225508-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91d/9356318/ae979c1e1814/jamanetwopen-e2225508-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91d/9356318/2b97386ca0f2/jamanetwopen-e2225508-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91d/9356318/fee470ca9147/jamanetwopen-e2225508-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91d/9356318/ae979c1e1814/jamanetwopen-e2225508-g003.jpg
摘要

重要性

人际接触对于传播与医疗保健相关的病原体非常重要。量化这些接触模式对于疾病传播建模和理解潜在传播途径至关重要。

目的

根据患者在医院科室中的接触情况,生成和分析医院患者的混合矩阵。

设计、设置和参与者:在这项质量改进研究中,使用连接医院患者的加权接触网络创建混合矩阵,其中接触定义为在同一医院科室中停留 1 天。参与者包括 2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间参与杜克抗菌药物管理外展网络的美国东南部 24 家医院的 299 个医院科室中的住院患者。分析于 2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 2 月进行。

主要结果和测量指标

使用年龄、Elixhauser 评分和抗生素暴露的衡量标准评估每个医院科室的患者混合矩阵。

结果

在 299 个医院科室的 1549413 名住院患者(中位数[IQR]年龄,44[26-63]岁;883580[56.3%]为女性)中,尽管患者数量差异很大,但某些科室的模式在多家医院中非常相似。对于大多数成年住院患者科室,年龄较大的患者群体经常混合,而门诊科室(例如急诊部门和行为健康科室)则显示不同年龄组之间的混合。大多数科室的混合模式遵循年龄的边缘分布;然而,年龄在 90 岁或以上且住院时间较长的患者在一些医疗病房中形成了次要高峰。从基于抗生素管理计划优先级的 4 分制抗生素谱的 Elixhauser 评分混合矩阵来看,在重症监护病房观察到相对较高共病指数患者之间的混合。基于抗生素使用类型在不同科室中的变化,抗生素谱的混合矩阵产生了 6 种主要不同的模式,即单一抗生素谱主导(窄谱、广谱或扩展)、1 种模式涵盖所有抗生素谱类型以及 2 种窄谱和扩展谱主导暴露模式(一个急诊室,患者接触一种或另一种抗生素,儿科病房,患者接触两种抗生素)。

结论和相关性

这项质量改进研究发现,医院内和医院间患者的混合模式大致遵循预期模式,尽管存在相当大的异质性。这些模式可用于为与医疗保健相关的感染的数学模型提供信息,评估模型和政策在较小社区医院的适用性,并为依赖改变患者接触模式的干预措施的设计提供基线信息,例如在医院内转移患者的实践。

相似文献

1
Use of Contact Networks to Estimate Potential Pathogen Risk Exposure in Hospitals.利用接触网络估计医院潜在病原体风险暴露。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2225508. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25508.
2
Stewardship Prompts to Improve Antibiotic Selection for Urinary Tract Infection: The INSPIRE Randomized Clinical Trial.促进改善尿路感染抗生素选择的管理策略:INSPIRE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2024 Jun 18;331(23):2018-2028. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.6259.
3
Stewardship Prompts to Improve Antibiotic Selection for Pneumonia: The INSPIRE Randomized Clinical Trial. stewardship 干预措施对肺炎抗生素选择的影响:INSPIRE 随机临床试验
JAMA. 2024 Jun 18;331(23):2007-2017. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.6248.
4
Hospital ward antibiotic prescribing and the risks of Clostridium difficile infection.医院病房抗生素处方与艰难梭菌感染的风险。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Apr;175(4):626-33. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.8273.
5
Association of a Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use With Antibiotic Use and Hospital-Onset Clostridioides difficile Infection Rates Among US Hospitals.改善抗生素使用安全方案与美国医院抗生素使用和医院获得性艰难梭菌感染率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e210235. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0235.
6
Development of a Machine Learning Model Using Electronic Health Record Data to Identify Antibiotic Use Among Hospitalized Patients.利用电子健康记录数据开发机器学习模型以识别住院患者中的抗生素使用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e213460. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3460.
7
Assessment of the Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Use in US Hospitals.美国医院抗菌药物使用适宜性评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e212007. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2007.
8
Strategies to control antibiotic resistance: results from a survey in Italian children's hospitals.控制抗生素耐药性的策略:意大利儿童医院的一项调查结果
Ann Ig. 2019 Jan-Feb;31(1):3-12. doi: 10.7416/ai.2019.2253.
9
Opportunities to Improve Antibiotic Appropriateness in U.S. ICUs: A Multicenter Evaluation.美国 ICU 中改善抗生素使用适宜性的机会:一项多中心评估。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul;48(7):968-976. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004344.
10
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients.改善医院住院患者抗生素处方行为的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of a Collaborative, Community Hospital Network for Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Implementation.协作式社区医院网络对抗菌药物管理实施计划的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):1656-1663. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab356.
2
Development of an Electronic Definition for De-escalation of Antibiotics in Hospitalized Patients.制定住院患者抗生素降阶梯治疗的电子定义。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):e4507-e4514. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa932.
3
Severe Outcomes Among Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) - United States, February 12-March 16, 2020.
2020 年 2 月 12 日至 3 月 16 日,美国 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的严重结局。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Mar 27;69(12):343-346. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6912e2.
4
The Role of Healthcare Worker-Mediated Contact Networks in the Transmission of Vancomycin-Resistant .医护人员介导的接触网络在耐万古霉素传播中的作用
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 15;7(3):ofaa056. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa056. eCollection 2020 Mar.
5
Estimating Time Physicians and Other Health Care Workers Spend with Patients in an Intensive Care Unit Using a Sensor Network.使用传感器网络估计重症监护病房中医生和其他卫生保健工作者与患者在一起的时间。
Am J Med. 2018 Aug;131(8):972.e9-972.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
6
Social contact patterns relevant to the spread of respiratory infectious diseases in Hong Kong.香港与呼吸道传染病传播相关的社会接触模式。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 11;7(1):7974. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08241-1.
7
Estimating contact patterns relevant to the spread of infectious diseases in Russia.估算与俄罗斯传染病传播相关的接触模式。
J Theor Biol. 2017 Apr 21;419:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.01.041. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
8
Receipt of Antibiotics in Hospitalized Patients and Risk for Clostridium difficile Infection in Subsequent Patients Who Occupy the Same Bed.住院患者接受抗生素治疗与随后入住同一病房的艰难梭菌感染患者的风险。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 1;176(12):1801-1808. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6193.
9
The social life of infants in the context of infectious disease transmission; social contacts and mixing patterns of the very young.传染病传播背景下婴儿的社会生活;非常年幼者的社会接触和混合模式。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 16;8(10):e76180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076180. eCollection 2013.
10
A risk factor analysis of healthcare-associated fungal infections in an intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study.重症监护病房医源性真菌感染的危险因素分析:回顾性队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Jan 9;13:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-10.