Suppr超能文献

妊娠期运动干预对妊娠期糖尿病高危妇女预防效果的Meta 分析:已发表 RCT 研究。

Effectiveness of exercise intervention during pregnancy on high-risk women for gestational diabetes mellitus prevention: A meta-analysis of published RCTs.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.

Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 5;17(8):e0272711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272711. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed at investigating the preventive role of exercise intervention during pregnancy, in high-risk women for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated exercise interventions during pregnancy on women at high risk for GDM. Data were combined with random effects models. Between study heterogeneity (Cochran's Q statistic) and the extent of study effects variability [I2 with 95% confidence interval (CI)] were estimated. Sensitivity analyses examined the effect of population, intervention, and study characteristics. We also evaluated the potential for publication bias.

RESULTS

Among the 1,508 high-risk women who were analyzed in 9 RCTs, 374 (24.8%) [160 (21.4%) in intervention, and 214 (28.1%) in control group] developed GDM. Women who received exercise intervention during pregnancy were less likely to develop GDM compared to those who followed the standard prenatal care (OR 0.70, 95%CI 0.52, 0.93; P-value 0.02) [Q 10.08, P-value 0.26; I2 21% (95%CI 0, 62%]. Studies with low attrition bias also showed a similar result (OR 0.70, 95%CI 0.51, 0.97; P-value 0.03). A protective effect was also supported when analysis was limited to studies including women with low education level (OR 0.55; 95%CI 0.40, 0.74; P-value 0.0001); studies with exercise intervention duration more than 20 weeks (OR 0.54; 95%CI 0.40, 0.74; P-value 0.0007); and studies with a motivation component in the intervention (OR 0.69, 95%CI 0.50, 0.96; P-value 0.03). We could not exclude large variability in study effects because the upper limit of I2 confidence interval was higher than 50% for all analyses. There was no conclusive evidence for small study effects (P-value 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study might support a protective effect of exercise intervention during pregnancy for high-risk women to prevent GDM. The protective result should be corroborated by large, high quality RCTs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨孕期运动干预对妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)高危妇女的预防作用。

材料和方法

我们在 PubMed、CENTRAL 和 Scopus 中检索了评估孕期运动干预对 GDM 高危妇女影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用随机效应模型对数据进行合并。通过 Cochran's Q 统计量评估研究间异质性和研究效应变异性程度[I2 及其 95%置信区间(CI)]。敏感性分析考察了人群、干预和研究特征的影响。我们还评估了发表偏倚的可能性。

结果

在 9 项 RCT 中分析的 1508 名高危妇女中,374 名(24.8%)[干预组 160 名(21.4%),对照组 214 名(28.1%)]发生 GDM。与接受标准产前护理的妇女相比,接受孕期运动干预的妇女发生 GDM 的可能性较低(OR 0.70,95%CI 0.52,0.93;P 值 0.02)[Q 值 10.08,P 值 0.26;I2 21%(95%CI 0,62%]。低失访偏倚的研究也得出了类似的结果(OR 0.70,95%CI 0.51,0.97;P 值 0.03)。当分析仅限于包括文化程度较低的妇女的研究时,也支持保护作用(OR 0.55;95%CI 0.40,0.74;P 值 0.0001);当干预的运动干预持续时间超过 20 周时(OR 0.54;95%CI 0.40,0.74;P 值 0.0007);当干预中包含激励因素时(OR 0.69,95%CI 0.50,0.96;P 值 0.03)。由于所有分析的 I2 置信区间上限均高于 50%,因此我们不能排除研究效果存在较大差异。由于小研究效果的 P 值为 0.31,因此没有确凿证据表明存在小研究效果。

结论

我们的研究可能支持孕期运动干预对高危妇女预防 GDM 的保护作用。需要进行更大规模、高质量的 RCT 来证实这一保护结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b322/9355219/63d710f9312d/pone.0272711.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验