Instituto de Virología "Dr. J. M. Vanella", Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina.
Cancer Control Section, Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 5;17(8):e0272809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272809. eCollection 2022.
In the United States (U.S.), a hepatitis E virus (HEV) seroprevalence between 6 and 21% has been described, with a decreasing trend. We aimed to investigate HEV infection in the U.S. population from 2009 to 2016, and examine the differences in seroprevalence using different assays. We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES-CDC) to estimate HEV seroprevalence and analyze demographic variables related to the infection. Additionally, we compared 4 serological tests used. The estimated HEV seroprevalence between 2009-2016 was 6.1% (95% CI: 5.6%-7.0%) for IgG and 1.02% (0.8%-1.2%) for IgM. Higher HEV IgG prevalences were found in older people, females, non-Hispanic Asians and those born outside of the U.S. The in-house immunoassay and the Wantai HEV-IgG ELISA presented the highest sensitivity values in the tested population. The highest specificity values corresponded to the DSI-EIA-ANTI-HEV-IgG assay. The kappa statistical values showed concordances no greater than 0.64 between the assays. HEV prevalence in our study was similar to previously reported, and a decline in the prevalence was observed through the NHANES assessments (from 1988 to 2016). The sensitivity and specificity of the assays varied widely, making comparisons difficult and highlighting the need to develop a gold standard assay.
在美国,描述了一种血清阳性率在 6%至 21%之间的戊型肝炎病毒(HEV),呈下降趋势。我们旨在调查 2009 年至 2016 年美国人群中的 HEV 感染情况,并使用不同的检测方法检查血清阳性率的差异。我们使用了来自国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES-CDC)的数据来估计 HEV 血清阳性率,并分析与感染相关的人口统计学变量。此外,我们比较了 4 种血清学检测方法。2009-2016 年 IgG 的估计血清阳性率为 6.1%(95%可信区间:5.6%-7.0%),IgM 的估计血清阳性率为 1.02%(0.8%-1.2%)。在老年人、女性、非西班牙裔亚洲人和在美国境外出生的人群中,HEV IgG 阳性率较高。在测试人群中,内部免疫测定法和万泰 HEV-IgG ELISA 呈现出最高的灵敏度值。最高的特异性值对应于 DSI-EIA-ANTI-HEV-IgG 检测方法。kappa 统计值显示,这些检测方法之间的一致性不超过 0.64。我们的研究中 HEV 的流行率与之前的报告相似,并且通过 NHANES 评估观察到流行率下降(从 1988 年到 2016 年)。检测方法的灵敏度和特异性差异很大,使得比较变得困难,并强调需要开发黄金标准检测方法。