Suppr超能文献

一种 4.75 毫米和一种 5.5 毫米骨锚在两种不同插入角度下,采用单股和双股缝线的生物力学评估。

Biomechanical evaluation of a 4.75-mm and a 5.5-mm bone anchor at two insertion angles using one and two strands of suture.

机构信息

The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Capital Animal Hospital Veterinary Surgical Center, Columbia, SC.

出版信息

Am J Vet Res. 2022 May 21;83(7):ajvr.21.05.0065. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.21.05.0065.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare biomechanical strength of 4.75- and 5.5-mm suture anchors when pulled at 45° or 90° angles using 1 versus 2 strands of suture.

SAMPLE

48 synthetic bone block samples.

PROCEDURES

Anchors were inserted into synthetic bone blocks and tested for pullout in 4 configurations (1 suture strand vs 2 strands and 45° vs 90° insertion angle) for a total of 8 groups with 6 samples each. A 3-way ANOVA was used to compare effect of anchor size, strand amount, and angle of pull.

RESULTS

All constructs failed via anchor pullout. Anchor configurations with 2 strands of suture and 4.75-mm anchor (mean, 286 ± 24 N) or 5.5-mm anchor (mean, 300 ± 15 N) had greater pullout strength than configurations with only 1 strand of suture and 4.75-mm anchor (mean, 202 ± 12 N) or 5.5-mm anchor (mean, 286 ± 13.6 N). The 5.5-mm anchors had a higher maximum load to failure under axial pull at 45° (mean, 300 ± 15 N) and 90° (mean, 295 ± 24 N), compared with 4.75-mm anchors at 45° (mean, 202 ± 12 N) and 90° (mean, 208 ± 15 N). There was a higher maximum load to failure for the double-stranded constructs, regardless of anchor size, at both angles of insertion. Anchors inserted at 45° had a higher maximum load to failure than those inserted at 90°. Constructs with 2 strands of suture had a greater pullout strength regardless of the direction of pull.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The strength of the anchor construct is likely increased with the use of double-loaded anchors inserted at 45°. Clinicians should consider using 2 strands in clinical cases.

摘要

目的

比较在 45°或 90°角以 1 或 2 根缝线拉动时,4.75 和 5.5mm 缝线锚钉的生物力学强度。

样本

48 个合成骨块样本。

程序

将锚钉插入合成骨块中,并在 4 种配置(1 根缝线与 2 根缝线和 45°与 90°插入角度)下进行拔出测试,共 8 组,每组 6 个样本。采用三因素方差分析比较锚钉大小、缝线数量和拔出角度的影响。

结果

所有结构均因锚钉拔出而失效。与仅使用 1 根缝线和 4.75mm 锚钉(平均 202±12N)或 5.5mm 锚钉(平均 286±13.6N)的配置相比,使用 2 根缝线和 4.75mm 锚钉(平均 286±24N)或 5.5mm 锚钉(平均 300±15N)的锚钉配置具有更大的拔出强度。在 45°和 90°轴向拉力下,5.5mm 锚钉的最大失效负荷更高(分别为 300±15N 和 295±24N),而 4.75mm 锚钉在 45°和 90°时(分别为 202±12N 和 208±15N)则较低。无论锚钉大小如何,双股缝线构建体在两个插入角度的最大失效负荷都更高。以 45°插入的锚钉的最大失效负荷高于以 90°插入的锚钉。无论拉力方向如何,使用双股缝线的构建体都具有更大的拔出强度。

临床相关性

使用 45°角插入的双负载锚钉,锚钉结构的强度可能会增加。临床医生在临床情况下应考虑使用 2 根缝线。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验