Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75080, USA.
Otolaryngology Branch, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Washington D.C. 20892, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Jul;152(1):470. doi: 10.1121/10.0011739.
Pure-tone thresholds have long served as a gold standard for evaluating hearing sensitivity and documenting hearing changes related to medical treatments, toxic or otherwise hazardous exposures, ear disease, genetic disorders involving the ear, and deficits that develop during aging. Although the use of pure-tone audiometry is basic and standard, interpretation of thresholds obtained at multiple frequencies in both ears over multiple visits can be complex. Significant additional complexity is introduced when audiometric tests are performed within ototoxicity monitoring programs to determine if hearing loss occurs as an adverse reaction to an investigational medication and during the design and conduct of clinical trials for new otoprotective agents for noise and drug-induced hearing loss. Clinical trials using gene therapy or stem cell therapy approaches are emerging as well with audiometric outcome selection further complicated by safety issues associated with biological therapies. This review addresses factors that must be considered, including test-retest variability, significant threshold change definitions, use of ototoxicity grading scales, interpretation of early warning signals, measurement of notching in noise-induced hearing loss, and application of age-based normative data to interpretation of pure-tone thresholds. Specific guidance for clinical trial protocols that will assure rigorous methodological approaches and interpretable audiometric data are provided.
纯音阈值长期以来一直被用作评估听力灵敏度的金标准,并记录与医学治疗、有毒或其他有害物质暴露、耳部疾病、涉及耳朵的遗传障碍以及衰老过程中出现的缺陷相关的听力变化。尽管纯音听力测试的使用是基本和标准的,但在多次就诊时对双耳多个频率获得的阈值进行解释可能会很复杂。当在耳毒性监测计划中进行听力测试以确定听力损失是否是对研究药物的不良反应以及在新的噪声和药物诱导性听力损失的耳保护剂的临床试验的设计和进行中发生时,会引入更大的复杂性。使用基因治疗或干细胞治疗方法的临床试验也正在出现,由于与生物疗法相关的安全问题,听力结果选择进一步复杂化。本文综述了必须考虑的因素,包括测试-重测变异性、显著阈值变化定义、耳毒性分级量表的使用、早期预警信号的解释、噪声性听力损失中的切迹测量以及基于年龄的正常数据在纯音阈值解释中的应用。提供了特定的临床试验方案指南,以确保严格的方法学方法和可解释的听力数据。