• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雾霾预警政策能减少交通事故吗:来自中国的证据

Can haze warning policy reduce traffic accidents: evidence from China.

作者信息

Yu Hongwei, Hu Xiaoyue, Gao Juan

机构信息

Institute of Quality Development Strategy, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, People's Republic of China.

School of Political Science and Public Administration, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(2):2703-2720. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22322-3. Epub 2022 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-22322-3
PMID:35932344
Abstract

Haze pollution may decrease drivers' driving performance by worsening their physical and psychological states. This paper explores the effects of haze warning policy on traffic accidents for the first time. We use the daily-city traffic accident data from 2016 to 2019 in China and construct Regression Discontinuity (RD) strategies based on the warning signal thresholds of PM2.5 concentration for estimations. The results show that one yellow warning and one orange warning can reduce traffic accidents by 8.8% and 13.1% on that day respectively, while the red warning does not work significantly possibly due to the self-perceived channel rather than the warning-signal channel. We also find that the effects may vary among different groups of drivers, vehicles, and roads. Our results prove that the haze warning policy is a non-negligible tool to reduce traffic accidents, which is useful to policy-making both related to haze pollution regulation and transportation safety.

摘要

雾霾污染可能会通过恶化驾驶员的身心状态而降低其驾驶表现。本文首次探讨了雾霾预警政策对交通事故的影响。我们使用了2016年至2019年中国城市每日交通事故数据,并基于PM2.5浓度的预警信号阈值构建回归断点(RD)策略进行估计。结果表明,一次黄色预警和一次橙色预警分别可在当日将交通事故减少8.8%和13.1%,而红色预警效果不显著,这可能是由于自我认知渠道而非预警信号渠道所致。我们还发现,不同驾驶员、车辆和道路群体的影响可能存在差异。我们的结果证明,雾霾预警政策是减少交通事故的一个不可忽视的工具,这对雾霾污染治理和交通安全相关的政策制定都很有用。

相似文献

1
Can haze warning policy reduce traffic accidents: evidence from China.雾霾预警政策能减少交通事故吗:来自中国的证据
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(2):2703-2720. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22322-3. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
2
Haze management: is urban public transportation priority effective?雾霾治理:城市公共交通优先是否有效?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(22):32749-32762. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17871-y. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
3
Can transportation infrastructure reduce haze pollution in China?交通基础设施能否减少中国的雾霾污染?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(11):15564-15581. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16902-y. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
4
The impact of drivers' short-term exposure to air pollution on traffic deaths.短期暴露于空气污染对交通死亡人数的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(40):61323-61333. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20230-0. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
5
Factors influencing traffic accident frequencies on urban roads: A spatial panel time-fixed effects error model.影响城市道路交通事故频率的因素:空间面板时间固定效应误差模型。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 4;14(4):e0214539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214539. eCollection 2019.
6
Effect of audio in-vehicle red light-running warning message on driving behavior based on a driving simulator experiment.基于驾驶模拟器实验的车内音频闯红灯警告信息对驾驶行为的影响
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(1):48-54. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.906038. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
7
Does Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy Alleviate Urban Haze Pollution? Empirical Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China.低碳城市试点政策能缓解城市雾霾污染吗?来自中国准自然实验的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 27;18(21):11287. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111287.
8
Quantifying drivers' visual perception to analyze accident-prone locations on two-lane mountain highways.量化驾驶员的视觉感知,分析双车道山区公路事故多发地段。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Oct;119:122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
9
Does bike-sharing reduce traffic congestion? Evidence from three mega-cities in China.共享单车能否缓解交通拥堵?来自中国三个特大城市的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 20;19(8):e0306317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306317. eCollection 2024.
10
Effects of traffic enforcement cameras on macro-level traffic safety: A spatial modeling analysis considering interactions with roadway and Land use characteristics.交通执法摄像机对宏观交通安全的影响:考虑与道路和土地利用特征相互作用的空间建模分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;144:105659. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105659. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of weather factors on road traffic casualties: Analysis on provincial panel data of China from 2006 to 2021.天气因素对道路交通伤亡的影响:基于2006年至2021年中国省级面板数据的分析
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 23;10(17):e36788. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36788. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
2
The Impact of Air Pollution on the Protection of World Cultural Heritage in China.空气污染对中国世界文化遗产保护的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 17;19(16):10226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610226.