• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯吡格雷与阿司匹林治疗老年缺血性脑卒中患者的有效性和安全性。

Effectiveness and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin in Elderly Patients With Ischemic Stroke.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei, Taiwan.

School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 2022 Aug;97(8):1483-1492. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.01.033.

DOI:10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.01.033
PMID:35933134
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risks of recurrent stroke and major bleeding events with clopidogrel and aspirin use among patients aged 80 years or older.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Full Population Data of the Health and Welfare Database in Taiwan. Patients aged 80 years or older who received monotherapy with clopidogrel or aspirin following hospitalization for primary acute ischemic stroke between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2018, were included. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance measured covariates between clopidogrel and aspirin users. Measured outcomes included recurrent acute ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, composite cardiovascular events (recurrent stroke or acute myocardial infarction), intracranial hemorrhage, major gastrointestinal tract bleeding, and composite major bleeding events (intracranial hemorrhage or major gastrointestinal tract bleeding).

RESULTS

A total of 15,045 patients were included in the study, 1979 of whom used clopidogrel and 13,066 who used aspirin following hospitalization for primary acute ischemic stroke. Clopidogrel use was associated with significantly lower risk of recurrent acute ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.96; P=.002), composite cardiovascular events (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.95; P<.001), intracranial hemorrhage (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.90; P=.005), and composite major bleeding events (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.99; P=.04) compared with aspirin use.

CONCLUSION

In patients aged 80 years or older with primary acute ischemic stroke, clopidogrel users had lower risks of recurrent stroke and the composite cardiovascular events compared with aspirin users. Clopidogrel users also had lower risks of intracranial hemorrhage and the composite major bleeding events compared with aspirin users.

摘要

目的

评估 80 岁及以上患者使用氯吡格雷和阿司匹林治疗复发性卒中及大出血事件的风险。

患者和方法

本回顾性队列研究使用了台湾全民健康保险数据库的全人群数据。2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间,因初次急性缺血性卒中住院后接受氯吡格雷或阿司匹林单药治疗的 80 岁及以上患者纳入本研究。采用逆概率治疗加权法平衡氯吡格雷和阿司匹林使用者之间的测量协变量。测量结局包括复发性急性缺血性卒中、急性心肌梗死、心血管复合事件(复发性卒中或急性心肌梗死)、颅内出血、主要胃肠道出血和复合大出血事件(颅内出血或主要胃肠道出血)。

结果

共纳入 15045 例患者,其中 1979 例使用氯吡格雷,13066 例使用阿司匹林治疗初次急性缺血性卒中。与阿司匹林相比,氯吡格雷治疗与复发性急性缺血性卒中(风险比[HR],0.89;95%置信区间[CI],0.83 至 0.96;P=.002)、心血管复合事件(HR,0.88;95% CI,0.82 至 0.95;P<.001)、颅内出血(HR,0.71;95% CI,0.56 至 0.90;P=.005)和复合大出血事件(HR,0.89;95% CI,0.80 至 0.99;P=.04)的风险显著降低有关。

结论

在初次急性缺血性卒中的 80 岁及以上患者中,与阿司匹林相比,氯吡格雷使用者的复发性卒中及心血管复合事件风险较低。与阿司匹林使用者相比,氯吡格雷使用者颅内出血及复合大出血事件风险也较低。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin in Elderly Patients With Ischemic Stroke.氯吡格雷与阿司匹林治疗老年缺血性脑卒中患者的有效性和安全性。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2022 Aug;97(8):1483-1492. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.01.033.
2
Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients With a History of Ischemic Stroke.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在伴有缺血性脑卒中史的急性心肌梗死患者中的应用比较。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2023 Nov;98(11):1602-1612. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.07.005.
3
Cilostazol plus Aspirin vs. Clopidogrel plus Aspirin in Acute Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.西洛他唑联合阿司匹林与氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗急性小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2024 Jun 1;31(6):904-916. doi: 10.5551/jat.64502. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
4
Risk for Major Hemorrhages in Patients Receiving Clopidogrel and Aspirin Compared With Aspirin Alone After Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the POINT Randomized Clinical Trial.接受氯吡格雷和阿司匹林治疗的患者与单独接受阿司匹林治疗的短暂性脑缺血发作或小卒中患者相比发生大出血的风险:POINT 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Jul 1;76(7):774-782. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0932.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor versus Aspirin and Clopidogrel for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Vascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.替格瑞洛对比阿司匹林和氯吡格雷用于血管疾病患者卒中预防的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Neurol. 2023;86(4):229-241. doi: 10.1159/000530504. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
6
Long-term effectiveness and safety of cilostazol versus clopidogrel in secondary prevention of noncardioembolic ischemic stroke.西洛他唑与氯吡格雷在非心源性缺血性脑卒中二级预防中的长期疗效和安全性比较。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Aug;79(8):1107-1116. doi: 10.1007/s00228-023-03522-3. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
7
Comparative Effectiveness of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Aspirin and Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Monotherapy in Mild-to-Moderate Acute Ischemic Stroke According to the Risk of Recurrent Stroke: An Analysis of 15 000 Patients From a Nationwide, Multicenter Registry.根据复发性中风风险比较阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双重抗血小板治疗与阿司匹林单药治疗在轻度至中度急性缺血性中风中的有效性:对来自全国多中心登记处的15000名患者的分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Nov;13(11):e006474. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006474. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
8
Aspirin plus clopidogrel aspirin mono-therapy for ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis.阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷与阿司匹林单药治疗缺血性脑卒中的Meta 分析。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2019 Aug;53(4):169-175. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2019.1620962. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
9
Ischemic and Bleeding Events Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Associated With Low-Dose Prasugrel vs Standard-Dose Clopidogrel Treatment.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中与低剂量普拉格雷与标准剂量氯吡格雷治疗相关的缺血和出血事件。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202004. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2004.
10
A comparison of aspirin and clopidogrel with or without proton pump inhibitors for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients at high risk for gastrointestinal bleeding.阿司匹林和氯吡格雷联合或不联合质子泵抑制剂用于胃肠道出血高危患者的心血管事件二级预防的比较。
Clin Ther. 2009 Sep;31(9):2038-47. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.09.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Clopidogrel combined with aspirin in the treatment of acute progressive cerebral infarction: A retrospective single-center analysis.氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗急性进展性脑梗死的疗效:一项单中心回顾性分析。
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 May-Jun;40(5):891-895. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.5.9206.
2
A Non-Coronary, Peripheral Arterial Atherosclerotic Disease (Carotid, Renal, Lower Limb) in Elderly Patients-A Review PART II-Pharmacological Approach for Management of Elderly Patients with Peripheral Atherosclerotic Lesions outside Coronary Territory.老年患者的非冠状动脉外周动脉粥样硬化疾病(颈动脉、肾动脉、下肢)——综述 第二部分——冠状动脉以外区域外周动脉粥样硬化病变老年患者的药物治疗方法
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 5;13(5):1508. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051508.
3
Cilostazol plus Aspirin vs. Clopidogrel plus Aspirin in Acute Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.
西洛他唑联合阿司匹林与氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗急性小卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2024 Jun 1;31(6):904-916. doi: 10.5551/jat.64502. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
4
Pars plana vitrectomy in patients aged 85 years and older: a single-centre, retrospective cohort study.85 岁及以上患者行平坦部玻璃体切除术:单中心回顾性队列研究。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Dec;43(12):4887-4896. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02891-z. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
5
Platelet morphology, ultrastructure and function changes in acute ischemic stroke patients based on structured illumination microscopy.基于结构照明显微镜观察急性缺血性脑卒中患者血小板的形态、超微结构及功能变化
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 25;9(8):e18543. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18543. eCollection 2023 Aug.