• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心源性休克的演变表现:医学文献与当前实践综述

Evolving Presentation of Cardiogenic Shock: A Review of the Medical Literature and Current Practices.

作者信息

Olarte Neal, Rivera Nina Thakkar, Grazette Luanda

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.

出版信息

Cardiol Ther. 2022 Sep;11(3):369-384. doi: 10.1007/s40119-022-00274-6. Epub 2022 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1007/s40119-022-00274-6
PMID:35933641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9381657/
Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with cardiovascular disease. In the past, acute myocardial infarction was the leading cause of CS. However, in recent years, other etiologies, such as decompensated chronic heart failure, arrhythmia, valvular disease, and post-cardiotomy, each with distinct hemodynamic profiles, have risen in prevalence. The number of treatment options, particularly with regard to device-mediated therapy has also increased. In this review, we sought to survey the medical literature and provide an update on current practices.

摘要

心源性休克(CS)仍然是心血管疾病患者发病和死亡的主要原因。过去,急性心肌梗死是CS的主要原因。然而,近年来,其他病因,如失代偿性慢性心力衰竭、心律失常、瓣膜病和心脏手术后,每种病因都有独特的血流动力学特征,其患病率有所上升。治疗选择的数量,特别是与设备介导的治疗有关的选择也有所增加。在本综述中,我们试图查阅医学文献并提供当前实践的最新情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b506/9381657/1921a1f4b067/40119_2022_274_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b506/9381657/1921a1f4b067/40119_2022_274_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b506/9381657/1921a1f4b067/40119_2022_274_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolving Presentation of Cardiogenic Shock: A Review of the Medical Literature and Current Practices.心源性休克的演变表现:医学文献与当前实践综述
Cardiol Ther. 2022 Sep;11(3):369-384. doi: 10.1007/s40119-022-00274-6. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
2
Clinical Outcomes Associated With Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support Utilization in Heart Failure Related Cardiogenic Shock.心力衰竭相关性心原性休克应用急性机械循环支持的临床转归。
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 May;14(5):e007924. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007924. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
3
Device profile of the Impella 5.0 and 5.5 system for mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock: overview of its safety and efficacy.Impella 5.0 和 5.5 系统用于机械循环支持的心源性休克患者的设备概况:安全性和疗效概述。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2022 Jan;19(1):1-10. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2015323. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
4
Implementation of a Cardiogenic Shock Team and Clinical Outcomes (INOVA-SHOCK Registry): Observational and Retrospective Study.心源性休克团队的实施与临床结局(INOVA-SHOCK注册研究):观察性与回顾性研究
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jun 28;7(6):e160. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9761.
5
Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support.接受临时机械循环支持的心源性休克患者的预后
JACC Asia. 2022 Oct 31;3(1):122-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.10.004. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Outcome differences in acute vs. acute on chronic heart failure and cardiogenic shock.急性心力衰竭与慢性心力衰竭急性发作及心源性休克的结局差异。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;7(3):1118-1124. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12670. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
7
Review of Pathophysiology of Cardiogenic Shock and Escalation of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.心源性休克的病理生理学综述及机械循环支持装置的升级
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Apr;25(4):213-227. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01843-4. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
8
The Rise of Endovascular Mechanical Circulatory Support Use for Cardiogenic Shock and High Risk Coronary Intervention: Considerations and Challenges.血管内机械循环支持在心原性休克和高危冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用日益增加:考虑因素和挑战。
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021 Feb;19(2):151-164. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2021.1863147. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
9
Current evidence in the diagnosis and management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndrome.目前在急性冠状动脉综合征并发心原性休克的诊断和处理中的证据。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 24;22(3):691-715. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2203078.
10
Clinical outcomes among cardiogenic shock patients supported with high-capacity Impella axial flow pumps: A report from the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group.高容量 Impella 轴流泵支持下心源性休克患者的临床结局:心源性休克工作组的报告。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Sep;43(9):1478-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.05.015. Epub 2024 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Mild Therapeutic Hypothermia on Hemodynamic Support in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.轻度治疗性低温对急性心肌梗死后心源性休克血流动力学支持的影响。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 20;17(6):e86407. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86407. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular volumes: a comparison of different methods in athletes.左心室容积的超声心动图评估:运动员中不同方法的比较
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Aug 5. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02504-4.
3
Pathophysiologic Vasodilation in Cardiogenic Shock and Its Impact on Mortality.

本文引用的文献

1
SCAI SHOCK Stage Classification Expert Consensus Update: A Review and Incorporation of Validation Studies: This statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), American Heart Association (AHA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in December 2021.SCAI休克分期分类专家共识更新:验证研究的回顾与纳入:本声明于2021年12月得到美国心脏病学会(ACC)、美国急诊医师学会(ACEP)、美国心脏协会(AHA)、欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性心血管护理协会(ACVC)、国际心肺移植学会(ISHLT)、危重病医学学会(SCCM)和胸外科医师学会(STS)的认可。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Jan 30;1(1):100008. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2021.100008. eCollection 2022 Jan-Feb.
2
The shock team: a multidisciplinary approach to early patient phenotyping and appropriate care escalation in cardiogenic shock.休克治疗团队:一种针对心源性休克患者进行早期表型分析及适当护理升级的多学科方法。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2022 May 1;37(3):241-249. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000967.
心原性休克的病理生理学血管扩张及其对死亡率的影响。
Circ Heart Fail. 2024 Sep;17(9):e011827. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011827. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
4
Decoding cardiogenic shock: assessing shock index and its variants as prognostic indicators for in-hospital mortality.解码心源性休克:评估休克指数及其变体作为院内死亡率的预后指标。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Oct;11(5):3023-3032. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14853. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
5
Atherosclerosis and Inflammation: Insights from the Theory of General Pathological Processes.动脉粥样硬化与炎症:通论病理过程学说的启示。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 26;24(9):7910. doi: 10.3390/ijms24097910.
3
2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国心力衰竭学会心力衰竭管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):e263-e421. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
4
Geographic variation in the use of continuous outpatient inotrope infusion therapy and beta blockers.持续门诊正性肌力药物输注治疗和β受体阻滞剂使用的地域差异。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Feb 16;39:100948. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100948. eCollection 2022 Apr.
5
Baseline characteristics, management, and predictors of early mortality in cardiogenic shock: insights from the FRENSHOCK registry.心原性休克的基线特征、处理方法和早期死亡率的预测因素:来自 FRENSHOCK 注册研究的见解。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Feb;9(1):408-419. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13734. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
6
Left Ventricular Unloading Before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前左心室卸载与伴心原性休克的急性心肌梗死患者生存率的改善相关:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jun;39:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.10.012. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
7
Right Heart Catheterization in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Improved Outcomes: Insights From the Nationwide Readmissions Database.右心导管术在心源性休克中与改善预后相关:来自全国再入院数据库的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Sep 7;10(17):e019843. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019843. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
8
Milrinone as Compared with Dobutamine in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock.米力农与多巴酚丁胺治疗心源性休克的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 5;385(6):516-525. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2026845.
9
Fifteen-Year Trends in Incidence of Cardiogenic Shock Hospitalization and In-Hospital Mortality in the United States.美国心源牲休克住院发病率和住院病死率 15 年变化趋势
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e021061. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021061. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
10
Practices of Referring Patients to Advanced Heart Failure Centers.将患者转介至高级心力衰竭中心的实践。
J Card Fail. 2021 Nov;27(11):1251-1259. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.05.024. Epub 2021 Jun 17.