• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

休克治疗团队:一种针对心源性休克患者进行早期表型分析及适当护理升级的多学科方法。

The shock team: a multidisciplinary approach to early patient phenotyping and appropriate care escalation in cardiogenic shock.

作者信息

Brusca Samuel B, Caughron Hope, Njoroge Joyce N, Cheng Richard, O'Brien Connor G, Barnett Christopher F

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Cardiol. 2022 May 1;37(3):241-249. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000967.

DOI:10.1097/HCO.0000000000000967
PMID:35612936
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a highly morbid condition with mortality remaining greater than 30% despite improved pathophysiologic understanding and access to mechanical circulatory support (MCS). In response, shock teams modeled on successful multidisciplinary care structures for other diseases are being implemented nationwide.

RECENT FINDINGS

Primary data supporting a benefit of shock team implementation on patient outcomes are relatively limited and entirely observational. Four single-center before-and-after studies and one multicenter registry study have demonstrated improved outcomes in patients with CS, potentially driven by increased pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) utilization and earlier (and more appropriate) initiation of MCS. Shock teams are also supported by a growing body of literature recognizing the independent benefit of the interventions they seek to implement, including patient phenotyping with PAC use and an algorithmic approach to CS care. Though debated, MCS is also highly likely to improve CS outcomes when applied appropriately, which further supports a multidisciplinary shock team approach to patient and device selection.

SUMMARY

Shock teams likely improve patient outcomes by facilitating early patient phenotyping and appropriate intervention. Institutions should strongly consider adopting a multidisciplinary shock team approach to CS care, though additional data supporting these interventions are needed.

摘要

综述目的

心源性休克(CS)是一种高发病症,尽管对其病理生理学的理解有所改善,且可获得机械循环支持(MCS),但其死亡率仍超过30%。作为应对措施,以其他疾病成功的多学科护理结构为蓝本的休克治疗团队正在全国范围内实施。

最新发现

支持实施休克治疗团队对患者预后有益的主要数据相对有限,且完全是观察性的。四项单中心前后对照研究和一项多中心注册研究表明,CS患者的预后有所改善,这可能是由于肺动脉导管(PAC)使用增加以及更早(且更合适)启动MCS所致。越来越多的文献也支持休克治疗团队,这些文献认识到他们试图实施的干预措施具有独立益处,包括使用PAC进行患者表型分析以及采用算法方法进行CS护理。尽管存在争议,但MCS在适当应用时也极有可能改善CS的预后,这进一步支持了采用多学科休克治疗团队方法来选择患者和设备。

总结

休克治疗团队可能通过促进早期患者表型分析和适当干预来改善患者预后。各机构应强烈考虑采用多学科休克治疗团队方法来治疗CS,不过仍需要更多支持这些干预措施的数据。

相似文献

1
The shock team: a multidisciplinary approach to early patient phenotyping and appropriate care escalation in cardiogenic shock.休克治疗团队:一种针对心源性休克患者进行早期表型分析及适当护理升级的多学科方法。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2022 May 1;37(3):241-249. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000967.
2
Review of Pathophysiology of Cardiogenic Shock and Escalation of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.心源性休克的病理生理学综述及机械循环支持装置的升级
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Apr;25(4):213-227. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01843-4. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
3
Cardiogenic shock teams and centres: a contemporary review of multidisciplinary care for cardiogenic shock.心源性休克治疗团队与中心:心源性休克多学科护理的当代综述
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;8(2):988-998. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13180. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
4
Management and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock in Cardiac ICUs With Versus Without Shock Teams.心外 ICU 中是否设置休克团队对心源性休克的管理和预后的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Sep 28;78(13):1309-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.044.
5
Complete Hemodynamic Profiling With Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Lower In-Hospital Mortality.肺动脉导管进行完全血流动力学分析与心源性休克患者院内死亡率降低相关。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Nov;8(11):903-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.08.012.
6
Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock: Shock Team or Bust?机械循环支持在心源性休克中的应用:休克团队还是破产?
Can J Cardiol. 2020 Feb;36(2):197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.11.001. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
7
Building a cardiogenic shock response team: key considerations necessary to improve outcomes.构建心源性休克反应团队:改善预后的关键考虑因素。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2024 Aug 1;30(4):354-361. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001177. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
8
Impella percutaneous left ventricular assist device as mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock: A retrospective analysis from a tertiary academic medical center.Impella 经皮左心室辅助装置作为心源休克的机械循环支持:来自一家三级学术医疗中心的回顾性分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 1;99(1):37-47. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29434. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
9
Early Escalation of Mechanical Circulatory Support Stabilizes and Potentially Rescues Patients in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock.早期应用机械循环支持稳定并可能挽救难治性心源性休克患者。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Mar;13(3):e005853. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005853. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
10
Initial outcomes of a multidisciplinary network for the care of patients with cardiogenic shock.多学科网络治疗心原性休克患者的初步结果。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Jan;74(1):33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Microaxial flow pump in cardiogenic shock: a retrospective cohort study on outcomes and feasibility as a bridge to LVAD implantation.微轴流泵在心源性休克中的应用:一项关于作为左心室辅助装置植入桥梁的结局和可行性的回顾性队列研究。
Neth Heart J. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1007/s12471-025-01963-2.
2
Charting the Course for Careers in Interventional Heart Failure: Training, Challenges, and Future Directions.绘制介入性心力衰竭领域职业发展路径:培训、挑战与未来方向
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Feb 12;4(3Part A):102569. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2025.102569. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Clinical outcomes following shock team implementation for cardiogenic shock: a systematic review.
实施休克治疗团队治疗心源性休克后的临床结局:一项系统评价
Egypt Heart J. 2024 Dec 30;76(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s43044-024-00594-z.
4
Myocardial Recovery in Cardiogenic Shock.心肌梗死后心源性休克的心肌恢复。
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2024 Aug 20;20(4):64-75. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1383. eCollection 2024.
5
Cardiac intensive care unit: where we are in 2023.心脏重症监护病房:2023年我们所处的现状
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Nov 24;10:1201414. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1201414. eCollection 2023.
6
Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: Left, Right, and Biventricular Devices.临时机械循环支持:左、右和双心室装置。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2023;19(5):27-42. doi: 10.2174/1573403X19666230314115853.
7
Evolving Presentation of Cardiogenic Shock: A Review of the Medical Literature and Current Practices.心源性休克的演变表现:医学文献与当前实践综述
Cardiol Ther. 2022 Sep;11(3):369-384. doi: 10.1007/s40119-022-00274-6. Epub 2022 Aug 7.