Department of Radiology, Fujita Health University, School of Medicine, Japan.
Department of Radiology, Fujita Health University, School of Medicine, Japan; Joint Research Laboratory of Advanced Medical Imaging, Fujita Health University, School of Medicine, Japan.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Dec;94:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
To compare capabilities of compressed sensing (CS) with and without deep learning reconstruction (DLR) with those of conventional parallel imaging (PI) with and without DLR for improving examination time and image quality of shoulder MRI for patients with various shoulder diseases.
Thirty consecutive patients with suspected shoulder diseases underwent MRI at a 3 T MR system using PI and CS. All MR data was reconstructed with and without DLR. For quantitative image quality evaluation, ROI measurements were used to determine signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). For qualitative image quality assessment, two radiologists evaluated overall image quality, artifacts and diagnostic confidence level using a 5-point scoring system, and consensus of the two readers determined each final value. Tukey's HSD test was used to compare examination times to establish the capability of the two techniques for reducing examination time. All indexes for all methods were then compared by means of Tukey's HSD test or Wilcoxon's signed rank test.
CS with and without DLR showed significantly shorter examination times than PI with and without DLR (p < 0.05). SNR and CNR of CS or PI with DLR were significantly higher than of those without DLR (p < 0.05). Use of DLR significantly improved overall image quality and artifact incidence of CS and PI (p < 0.05).
Examination time with CS is shorter than with PI without deterioration of image quality of shoulder MRI. Moreover, DLR is useful for both CS and PI for improvement of image quality on shoulder MRI.
比较压缩感知(CS)与深度学习重建(DLR)和传统并行成像(PI)与 DLR 在改善各种肩部疾病患者肩部 MRI 检查时间和图像质量方面的能力。
30 例连续疑似肩部疾病患者在 3T 磁共振系统上进行 PI 和 CS 检查。所有 MR 数据均进行了 DLR 重建。为了进行定量图像质量评估,使用 ROI 测量来确定信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)。为了进行定性图像质量评估,两位放射科医生使用 5 分制评分系统评估整体图像质量、伪影和诊断置信度,并由两位读者的共识确定每个最终值。使用 Tukey 的 HSD 检验比较检查时间,以确定这两种技术减少检查时间的能力。然后使用 Tukey 的 HSD 检验或 Wilcoxon 的符号秩检验比较所有方法的所有指标。
CS 与 DLR 和 PI 与 DLR 相比,检查时间明显缩短(p<0.05)。CS 或 PI 与 DLR 的 SNR 和 CNR 明显高于无 DLR(p<0.05)。使用 DLR 可显著提高 CS 和 PI 的整体图像质量和伪影发生率(p<0.05)。
CS 检查时间比 PI 短,而不会降低肩部 MRI 的图像质量。此外,DLR 对 CS 和 PI 提高肩部 MRI 图像质量都很有用。