Asghar Muhammad Sohaib, Akram Mohammed, Yasmin Farah, Najeeb Hala, Naeem Unaiza, Gaddam Mrunanjali, Jafri Muhammad Saad, Tahir Muhammad Junaid, Yasin Iqra, Mahmood Hamid, Mehmood Qasim, Marzo Roy Rillera
Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Department of Internal Medicine, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 22;9:951556. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.951556. eCollection 2022.
In patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), several abnormal hematological biomarkers have been reported. The current study aimed to find out the association of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and derived NLR (dNLR) with COVID-19. The objective was to compare the accuracy of both of these markers in predicting the severity of the disease.
The study was conducted in a single-center having patients with COVID-19 with a considerable hospital stay. NLR is easily calculated by dividing the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) with the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) {ANC/ALC}, while dNLR is calculated by ANC divided by total leukocyte count minus ANC {ANC/(WBC-ANC)}. Medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) were represented by box plots. Multivariable logistic regression was performed obtaining an odds ratio (OR), 95% CI, and further adjusted to discover the independent predictors and risk factors associated with elevated NLR and dNLR.
A total of 1,000 patients with COVID-19 were included. The baseline NLR and dNLR were 5.00 (2.91-10.46) and 4.00 (2.33-6.14), respectively. A cut-off value of 4.23 for NLR and 2.63 for dNLR were set by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Significant associations of NLR were obtained by binary logistic regression for dependent outcome variables as ICU stay ( < 0.001), death ( < 0.001), and invasive ventilation ( < 0.001) while that of dNLR with ICU stay ( = 0.002), death ( < 0.001), and invasive ventilation ( = 0.002) on multivariate analysis when adjusted for age, gender, and a wave of pandemics. Moreover, the indices were found correlating with other inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, and procalcitonin (PCT).
Both markers are equally reliable and sensitive for predicting in-hospital outcomes of patients with COVID-19. Early detection and predictive analysis of these markers can allow physicians to risk assessment and prompt management of these patients.
在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者中,已有多项血液学生物标志物异常的报道。本研究旨在探究中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和衍生中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(dNLR)与COVID-19的关联。目的是比较这两种标志物在预测疾病严重程度方面的准确性。
本研究在一家收治COVID-19患者且住院时间较长的单中心进行。NLR通过绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)除以绝对淋巴细胞计数(ALC){ANC/ALC}轻松计算得出,而dNLR通过ANC除以白细胞总数减去ANC {ANC/(WBC - ANC)}计算得出。中位数和四分位间距(IQR)用箱线图表示。进行多变量逻辑回归分析以获得比值比(OR)、95%置信区间,并进一步调整以发现与升高的NLR和dNLR相关的独立预测因素和风险因素。
共纳入1000例COVID-19患者。基线NLR和dNLR分别为5.00(2.91 - 10.46)和4.00(2.33 - 6.14)。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)分析设定NLR的截断值为4.23,dNLR的截断值为2.63。在对年龄、性别和疫情波次进行调整后的多变量分析中,二元逻辑回归显示NLR与作为因变量的重症监护病房(ICU)住院(<0.001)、死亡(<0.001)和有创通气(<0.001)有显著关联,而dNLR与ICU住院(=0.002)、死亡(<0.001)和有创通气(=0.002)有显著关联。此外,发现这些指标与其他炎症标志物如C反应蛋白(CRP)、D-二聚体和降钙素原(PCT)相关。
这两种标志物在预测COVID-19患者的院内结局方面同样可靠且敏感。对这些标志物的早期检测和预测分析可使医生对这些患者进行风险评估并及时管理。