• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日常主管的虐待行为和同事的支持如何影响日常工作投入。

How daily supervisor abuse and coworker support affect daily work engagement.

作者信息

Wang Hongqing, Tang Tianzhen

机构信息

School of Business, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing, China.

School of Business, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:880528. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.880528. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.880528
PMID:35936342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9352933/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the dynamic and intervention mechanisms of daily abusive experience affecting daily work engagement. Drawing on conservation of resources (COR) theory, we examine the effect of daily abusive supervision on daily work engagement through daily negative emotions from the resource consumption perspective, and the moderation effect of coworker support from the resource provision perspective. Using a daily diary approach and based on a sample of 73 employees for 5 consecutive days in China. The results reveal that daily abusive supervision has a significant negative effect on daily work engagement, daily negative emotions mediate this relationship, and coworker support had a cross-level moderating effect between daily abusive supervision and daily negative emotions. Our study shows ways to boost employees' daily work engagement and especially ways buffer the negative effect of abused experience on work engagement.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨日常辱骂经历影响日常工作投入的动态及干预机制。基于资源守恒(COR)理论,我们从资源消耗的角度,通过日常负面情绪来考察日常辱骂性监督对日常工作投入的影响,并从资源提供的角度考察同事支持的调节作用。采用每日日记法,以中国73名员工连续5天的样本为基础。结果表明,日常辱骂性监督对日常工作投入有显著的负面影响,日常负面情绪在这一关系中起中介作用,同事支持在日常辱骂性监督和日常负面情绪之间具有跨层次的调节作用。我们的研究揭示了提高员工日常工作投入的方法,特别是缓冲受虐经历对工作投入负面影响的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3869/9352933/bfd92be6c274/fpsyg-13-880528-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3869/9352933/c418cfedc4ec/fpsyg-13-880528-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3869/9352933/bfd92be6c274/fpsyg-13-880528-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3869/9352933/c418cfedc4ec/fpsyg-13-880528-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3869/9352933/bfd92be6c274/fpsyg-13-880528-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
How daily supervisor abuse and coworker support affect daily work engagement.日常主管的虐待行为和同事的支持如何影响日常工作投入。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:880528. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.880528. eCollection 2022.
2
The effects of leaders' abusive supervision on employees' work engagement: a moderated-mediation model of employees' silence and employees' proactive personalities.领导的辱骂性监管对员工工作投入的影响:员工沉默和员工积极人格的中介调节模型。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2022 Jul 8;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/LHS-03-2022-0021.
3
The Effect of Daily Fluctuation of Abusive Supervision over Employees Positive and Negative Emotions, and Recovery Experience.虐待性监管对员工积极和消极情绪以及恢复体验的日波动效应。
Span J Psychol. 2022 Jan 5;25:e3. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2021.49.
4
Mistreatment from Multiple Sources: Interaction Effects of Abusive Supervision, Coworker Incivility, and Customer Incivility on Work Outcomes.遭受多方虐待:辱骂型主管行为、同事无礼行为和顾客无礼行为对工作结果的交互影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 18;18(10):5377. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105377.
5
Investigating daily abusive supervision as antecedent of subordinates' low psychological detachment and relaxation during nonwork time: A diary study.探讨日常辱骂性监管对下属非工作时间低心理解脱和放松的前置作用:一项日记研究。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2024 Aug;29(4):220-237. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000377. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
6
Linking Abusive Supervision to Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Behavior: Testing the Mediating Roles of Work Engagement and Negative Reciprocity.将虐待性监督与促进性和禁止性建言行为联系起来:检验工作投入和消极互惠的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 1;19(9):5498. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095498.
7
How Does Employees' Narcissism Influence Organizational Commitment? The Role of Perceived Supervisor Support and Abusive Supervision.员工的自恋如何影响组织承诺?感知到的上级支持和辱骂性监督的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 25;13:910739. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910739. eCollection 2022.
8
When Employees are Emotionally Exhausted Due to Abusive Supervision. A Conservation-of-Resources Perspective.当员工因虐待性监督而情绪疲惫时。资源保存视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 8;16(18):3300. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183300.
9
Effects of abusive supervision on employees' innovative behavior: The role of job insecurity and locus of control.辱虐管理对员工创新行为的影响:工作不安全感与控制点的作用。
Scand J Psychol. 2019 Apr;60(2):152-159. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12510. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
10
The Effect of Abusive Supervision on Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Negative Affect and Moderating Role of Interpersonal Harmony.辱虐管理对员工创造力的影响:消极情绪的中介作用与人际和谐的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 10;13:796355. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.796355. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Status and Influencing Factors of Nurses' Perception of Toxic Leadership Behavior: A Cross-Sectional Study.护士对毒性领导行为认知的现状及影响因素:一项横断面研究。
J Nurs Manag. 2023 Nov 29;2023:7711237. doi: 10.1155/2023/7711237. eCollection 2023.
2
The Impact of Stress on Innovative Work Behavior among Medical Healthcare Professionals.压力对医疗保健专业人员创新工作行为的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Sep 16;12(9):340. doi: 10.3390/bs12090340.

本文引用的文献

1
Employees' fear at work, job crafting, and work engagement on a daily basis: The case for fear of COVID-19.员工日常工作中的恐惧、工作重塑与工作投入:以对新冠病毒的恐惧为例
Appl Psychol. 2022 Apr 13. doi: 10.1111/apps.12388.
2
A New Concept of Work Engagement Theory in Cognitive Engagement, Emotional Engagement, and Physical Engagement.工作投入理论在认知投入、情感投入和身体投入方面的新概念。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 14;12:663440. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663440. eCollection 2021.
3
How Work-Family Conflict and Work-Family Facilitation Affect Employee Innovation: A Moderated Mediation Model of Emotions and Work Flexibility.
工作-家庭冲突与工作-家庭促进如何影响员工创新:情绪与工作灵活性的有调节中介模型
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 11;12:796201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.796201. eCollection 2021.
4
Facilitating health care workers' self-determination: The impact of a self-leadership intervention on work engagement, health, and performance.促进医护人员的自主决定权:自我领导干预对工作投入、健康和绩效的影响。
J Occup Organ Psychol. 2021 Jun;94(2):259-281. doi: 10.1111/joop.12352. Epub 2021 May 5.
5
Relationships Among Leaders' and Followers' Work Engagement and Followers' Subjective Career Success: A Multilevel Approach.领导者与追随者的工作投入度及追随者主观职业成功之间的关系:一种多层次研究方法。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 11;12:634350. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.634350. eCollection 2021.
6
The daily exchange of social support between coworkers: Implications for momentary work engagement.同事之间社会支持的日常交流:对即时工作投入的影响。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2020 Dec;25(6):439-449. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000262. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
7
Leader-Member Exchange, Work Engagement, and Psychological Withdrawal Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment.领导-成员交换、工作投入与心理退缩行为:心理授权的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 31;11:423. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00423. eCollection 2020.
8
The psychological mechanism linking employee work engagement and turnover intention: A moderated mediation study.连接员工工作投入与离职意愿的心理机制:一项有调节的中介研究。
Work. 2019;62(4):615-628. doi: 10.3233/WOR-192894.
9
Work Engagement and Flourishing at Work Among Nuns: The Moderating Role of Human Values.修女的工作投入与工作中的蓬勃发展:人类价值观的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 28;9:1874. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01874. eCollection 2018.
10
Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Work Engagement: The Effects of Person-Job Fit, Person-Group Fit, and Proactive Personality.连接赋能型领导与员工工作投入:个人-工作匹配、个人-团队匹配及积极人格的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 31;9:1304. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01304. eCollection 2018.