• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遭受多方虐待:辱骂型主管行为、同事无礼行为和顾客无礼行为对工作结果的交互影响。

Mistreatment from Multiple Sources: Interaction Effects of Abusive Supervision, Coworker Incivility, and Customer Incivility on Work Outcomes.

机构信息

School of Business, Hanyang University, 17 Haengdang-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea.

College of Business Administration, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon 22212, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 18;18(10):5377. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105377.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18105377
PMID:34070101
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8158377/
Abstract

Despite the large body of research on workplace mistreatment, surprisingly few studies have examined the interaction effect of multiple interpersonal stressors on employee outcomes. To fill this gap, our research aimed to test the moderating effects of coworker incivility and customer incivility on the relationship between abusive supervision, emotional exhaustion, and job performance. Analyses conducted on 651 South Korean frontline service employees revealed that abusive supervision exerted a significant indirect effect on job performance through emotional exhaustion. Customer incivility strengthened the positive relationship between abusive supervision and emotional exhaustion, as well as the indirect effect of abusive supervision on job performance through emotional exhaustion. Our post hoc analysis demonstrated a three-way interaction between abusive supervision, coworker incivility, and customer incivility; the relationship between abusive supervision and emotional exhaustion was significantly positive only when coworker incivility was high and customer incivility was low. We discuss the implications of our findings for theory and practice.

摘要

尽管有大量关于工作场所虐待的研究,但令人惊讶的是,很少有研究考察多种人际压力源对员工结果的交互影响。为了填补这一空白,我们的研究旨在检验同事无礼和客户无礼对虐待性监督、情绪耗竭和工作绩效之间关系的调节作用。对 651 名韩国一线服务员工的分析表明,虐待性监督通过情绪耗竭对工作绩效产生显著的间接影响。客户无礼增强了虐待性监督与情绪耗竭之间的正向关系,以及虐待性监督通过情绪耗竭对工作绩效的间接影响。我们的事后分析还表明,虐待性监督、同事无礼和客户无礼之间存在三向交互作用;只有当同事无礼程度高且客户无礼程度低时,虐待性监督与情绪耗竭之间的关系才呈显著正相关。我们讨论了这些发现对理论和实践的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78db/8158377/c3b6d9087323/ijerph-18-05377-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78db/8158377/e06fe9bfba50/ijerph-18-05377-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78db/8158377/6309c197f486/ijerph-18-05377-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78db/8158377/3217afc1748b/ijerph-18-05377-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78db/8158377/c3b6d9087323/ijerph-18-05377-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78db/8158377/e06fe9bfba50/ijerph-18-05377-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78db/8158377/6309c197f486/ijerph-18-05377-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78db/8158377/3217afc1748b/ijerph-18-05377-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78db/8158377/c3b6d9087323/ijerph-18-05377-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Mistreatment from Multiple Sources: Interaction Effects of Abusive Supervision, Coworker Incivility, and Customer Incivility on Work Outcomes.遭受多方虐待:辱骂型主管行为、同事无礼行为和顾客无礼行为对工作结果的交互影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 18;18(10):5377. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105377.
2
When Do Service Employees Suffer More from Job Insecurity? The Moderating Role of Coworker and Customer Incivility.服务员工何时会因工作不安而遭受更多痛苦?同事和顾客无礼行为的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 11;16(7):1298. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071298.
3
Having control or lacking control? Roles of job crafting and service scripts in coping with customer incivility.拥有控制权还是缺乏控制权?工作重塑和服务脚本在应对顾客无礼行为中的作用。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2022 Feb;27(1):104-118. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000288. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
4
From workplace mistreatment to job insecurity: The moderating effect of work centrality.从工作场所虐待到工作不安全感:工作中心性的调节作用。
Stress Health. 2020 Aug;36(3):249-263. doi: 10.1002/smi.2915. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
5
Predicting frontline employees' emotional labor after suffering customer incivility: A job passion perspective.预测遭受顾客无礼对待后一线员工的情绪劳动:从工作激情的角度。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Apr;244:104178. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104178. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
6
How rude! Emotional labor as a mediator between customer incivility and employee outcomes.真无礼!情绪劳动在顾客粗俗语行为与员工结果之间的中介作用。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2010 Oct;15(4):468-481. doi: 10.1037/a0020723.
7
Work-Related Identity Discrepancy and Counterproductive Work Behavior: The Role of Emotional Exhaustion and Supervisor Incivility.工作相关身份差异与反生产工作行为:情绪耗竭和主管粗言秽语的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 9;17(16):5747. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165747.
8
Abusive supervision climate and turnover intention: Is it my coworkers or my supervisor ostracizing me?不良监督氛围与离职倾向:是同事还是主管在排斥我?
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Sep;30(6):1462-1469. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13398. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
9
Suffering doubly: How victims of coworker incivility risk poor performance ratings by responding with organizational deviance, unless they leverage ingratiation skills.双重痛苦:除非员工利用讨好技巧,否则他们以组织越轨行为回应同事无礼行为,可能会导致绩效评级不佳。
J Soc Psychol. 2021 Jan 2;161(1):86-102. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2020.1778617. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
10
A sorrow halved? A daily diary study on talking about experienced workplace incivility and next-morning negative affect.悲伤减半?一项关于谈论工作场所不文明经历与次日负面影响的日常日记研究。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2018 Oct;23(4):568-583. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000100. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Supervisor Incivility and Employee Job Performance: The Mediating Roles of Job Insecurity and Amotivation.主管的无礼行为与员工工作绩效:工作不安全感和动机缺失的中介作用。
J Psychol. 2020;154(1):38-59. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2019.1645634. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
2
A Motivational Perspective on Job Insecurity: Relationships Between Job Insecurity, Intrinsic Motivation, and Performance and Behavioral Outcomes.工作不安全感的激励视角:工作不安全感、内在动机与绩效和行为结果的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 22;16(10):1812. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101812.
3
When Do Service Employees Suffer More from Job Insecurity? The Moderating Role of Coworker and Customer Incivility.
服务员工何时会因工作不安而遭受更多痛苦?同事和顾客无礼行为的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 11;16(7):1298. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071298.
4
Customer mistreatment harms nightly sleep and next-morning recovery: Job control and recovery self-efficacy as cross-level moderators.顾客虐待会损害夜间睡眠和次日清晨的恢复:工作控制和恢复自我效能感作为跨层次的调节变量。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Apr;24(2):256-269. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000128. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
5
Service workers' chain reactions to daily customer mistreatment: Behavioral linkages, mechanisms, and boundary conditions.服务人员对日常顾客虐待的连锁反应:行为联系、机制和边界条件。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2018 Jan;23(1):58-70. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000050. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
6
When the customer is unethical: the explanatory role of employee emotional exhaustion onto work-family conflict, relationship conflict with coworkers, and job neglect.当顾客不道德时:员工情绪耗竭对工作-家庭冲突、与同事的关系冲突和工作疏忽的解释作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Nov;99(6):1188-203. doi: 10.1037/a0037221. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
7
The development and validation of the Incivility from Customers Scale.顾客不礼貌行为量表的编制与验证。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2013 Jul;18(3):310-26. doi: 10.1037/a0032753.
8
Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it.社会科学研究中方法偏差的来源及控制方法建议。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:539-69. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
9
The differential effects of interpersonal conflict from customers and coworkers: trait anger as a moderator.顾客和同事之间人际冲突的差异效应:特质愤怒的调节作用。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2011 Oct;16(4):424-40. doi: 10.1037/a0023874.
10
How rude! Emotional labor as a mediator between customer incivility and employee outcomes.真无礼!情绪劳动在顾客粗俗语行为与员工结果之间的中介作用。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2010 Oct;15(4):468-481. doi: 10.1037/a0020723.