Suppr超能文献

Meta 分析氨甲环酸在脊柱手术中的疗效和安全性。

Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Spinal Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Spinal Surgery, Nanjing Lishui People's Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jul 27;2022:9406497. doi: 10.1155/2022/9406497. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The safety and effectiveness of topical tranexamic acid in spinal surgery has not yet been reached, and further research is needed to confirm it. This study is aimed at detecting the effectiveness and safety on the tranexamic acid in spinal surgery.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and other databases were searched. The search time was from 2016 to 2019. All randomized controlled trials comparing the topical tranexamic acid group and the control group were collected. The experimental group used topical application. Tranexamic acid was used to treat bleeding after spinal surgery. The control group was no tranexamic acid or isotonic saline. The total bleeding, blood transfusion rate, and the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis were compared between the two groups. Rev Man 5.2.0 software was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 8 randomized controlled trials were included, including 884 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that the total bleeding volume of the tranexamic acid group was lower than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant weighted mean difference ((WMD) = -360.27 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-412.68, -307.87) mL, < 0.00001). The blood transfusion rate in the tranexamic acid group was lower than that in the control group (odds ratio (OR) = 0.22, 95% CI (0.14, 0.33), < 0.00001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis between the two groups: OR = 1.48, 95% CI (0.41, 5.34), = 0.55.

CONCLUSION

Tranexamic acid can significantly reduce perioperative total blood loss, intraoperative blood loss, and blood transfusion rate during spinal surgery but has no significant effect on blood transfusion and thrombosis.

摘要

目的

局部使用氨甲环酸在脊柱手术中的安全性和有效性尚未得到证实,需要进一步的研究来证实。本研究旨在检测氨甲环酸在脊柱手术中的效果和安全性。

方法

检索 Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、Embase、CNKI 等数据库。检索时间为 2016 年至 2019 年。收集所有比较局部应用氨甲环酸组和对照组的随机对照试验。实验组采用局部应用氨甲环酸治疗脊柱手术后出血。对照组未使用氨甲环酸或等渗盐水。比较两组的总出血量、输血率和深静脉血栓形成的发生率。采用 RevMan 5.2.0 软件进行荟萃分析。

结果

共纳入 8 项随机对照试验,共 884 例患者。Meta 分析结果显示,氨甲环酸组总出血量低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(加权均数差(WMD)=-360.27 ml,95%置信区间(CI)(-412.68,-307.87)ml, < 0.00001)。氨甲环酸组输血率低于对照组(比值比(OR)=0.22,95%CI(0.14,0.33), < 0.00001)。两组深静脉血栓形成发生率无显著差异:OR=1.48,95%CI(0.41,5.34), = 0.55。

结论

氨甲环酸可显著减少脊柱手术围手术期总出血量、术中出血量和输血率,但对输血和血栓形成无显著影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1bf/9348916/98632631f7e6/CMMM2022-9406497.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验