• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不可逆电穿孔与射频消融治疗恶性肝肿瘤的前瞻性单中心双臂试验。

Irreversible electroporation versus radiofrequency ablation for malignant hepatic tumor: A prospective single-center double-arm trial.

作者信息

Liu Boyu, Fu Dianxun, Fan Yong, Wang Zhe, Lang Xu

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Anshan Road 154#, Heping District, Tianjin, 300052, China.

出版信息

J Interv Med. 2022 Mar 20;5(2):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jimed.2022.03.010. eCollection 2022 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.jimed.2022.03.010
PMID:35936662
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9349015/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a nonthermal ablation technique for the treatment of malignant liver tumors. IRE has demonstrated efficacy and safety in the treatment of malignant liver tumors and its unique advantages in the treatment of nearby vascular lesions. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and intermediate-term outcomes of IRE and radiofrequency (RF) therapy in malignant liver tumors.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with primary or secondary liver malignancies were included in this prospective, double-arm clinical trial. Patients were randomly divided into the IRE and RF groups. The primary outcome was the efficacy (local ablation control evaluation at 90 days). The secondary outcomes were safety (procedure-related complications at ​≤ ​90 days) and intermediate-term survival (at 24 months).

RESULTS

The ablation assessment at 90 days after surgery with mRECIST for IRE versus RF were 70%, 20%, 0%, and 10% versus 92.9%, 7.1%, 0%, and 0% (CR, PR, SD, and PD, respectively). The complication rates of IRE versus RF with Clavien-Dindo classification were 16.7%, 25%, 0%, 8.3%, and 8.3% versus 8.3%, 50%, 0%, 0%, and 0% (Grade I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively). The average overall survival (OS) was 17.55 months in the IRE group (95% CI 15.13-22.37) and 18.75 months in the RF group (95% CI 12.48-22.61). There was no statistical difference between the IRE and RF groups in terms of efficacy (p ​= ​0.48), safety(p ​= ​0.887), or 24-month OS (p ​= ​0.959).

CONCLUSIONS

IRE ablation revealed similar efficacy and safety in a short-term follow-up, and similar OS in mid-term survival as RF ablation in treating malignant hepatic tumors.

摘要

目的

不可逆电穿孔(IRE)是一种用于治疗恶性肝肿瘤的非热消融技术。IRE已在恶性肝肿瘤治疗中展现出疗效和安全性,且在治疗附近血管病变方面具有独特优势。本研究旨在比较IRE与射频(RF)治疗恶性肝肿瘤的疗效、安全性及中期结果。

方法

本前瞻性双臂临床试验纳入了24例原发性或继发性肝恶性肿瘤患者。患者被随机分为IRE组和RF组。主要结局为疗效(90天时局部消融控制评估)。次要结局为安全性(≤90天时与手术相关的并发症)和中期生存率(24个月时)。

结果

IRE组与RF组术后90天采用mRECIST进行消融评估,结果分别为70%、20%、0%、10% 与92.9%、7.1%、0%、0%(分别为完全缓解、部分缓解、疾病稳定和疾病进展)。IRE组与RF组采用Clavien-Dindo分类法的并发症发生率分别为16.7%、25%、0%、8.3%、8.3% 与8.3%、50%、0%、0%、0%(分别为I级、II级、III级、IV级和V级)。IRE组的平均总生存期(OS)为17.55个月(95%可信区间15.13 - 22.37),RF组为18.75个月(95%可信区间12.48 - 22.61)。IRE组与RF组在疗效(p = 0.48)、安全性(p = 0.887)或24个月总生存期(p = 0.959)方面无统计学差异。

结论

在短期随访中,IRE消融在治疗恶性肝肿瘤方面显示出与RF消融相似的疗效和安全性,中期生存的总生存期也相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb7/9349015/8d6f5cd3d54b/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb7/9349015/991b3416141a/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb7/9349015/fcfbe2a35eb3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb7/9349015/0a456a4e8fd8/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb7/9349015/8d6f5cd3d54b/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb7/9349015/991b3416141a/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb7/9349015/fcfbe2a35eb3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb7/9349015/0a456a4e8fd8/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bb7/9349015/8d6f5cd3d54b/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Irreversible electroporation versus radiofrequency ablation for malignant hepatic tumor: A prospective single-center double-arm trial.不可逆电穿孔与射频消融治疗恶性肝肿瘤的前瞻性单中心双臂试验。
J Interv Med. 2022 Mar 20;5(2):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jimed.2022.03.010. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Novel irreversible electroporation ablation (Nano-knife) versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of solid liver tumors: a comparative, randomized, multicenter clinical study.新型不可逆电穿孔消融术(纳米刀)与射频消融术治疗肝脏实体肿瘤的比较、随机、多中心临床研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 29;12:945123. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.945123. eCollection 2022.
3
Irreversible Electroporation versus Radiofrequency Ablation: A Comparison of Local and Systemic Effects in a Small-Animal Model.不可逆电穿孔与射频消融:小动物模型中局部和全身效应的比较。
Radiology. 2016 Aug;280(2):413-24. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015151166. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
4
Irreversible Electroporation versus Radiofrequency Ablation: Comparison of Systemic Immune Responses in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.不可逆电穿孔与射频消融治疗肝细胞癌患者的全身免疫反应比较。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Jun;30(6):845-853.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.03.002.
5
Single-center nonrandomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of irreversible electroporation (IRE) ablation of liver tumors in humans: Short to mid-term results.评估不可逆电穿孔(IRE)消融人类肝脏肿瘤安全性和有效性的单中心非随机临床试验:短期至中期结果
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;43(4):751-757. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.12.004. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
6
A retrospective study of irreversible electroporation for tumors adjacent to perihepatic important structure.一项关于不可逆电穿孔治疗肝周重要结构附近肿瘤的回顾性研究。
Front Oncol. 2024 Sep 12;14:1387952. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1387952. eCollection 2024.
7
Midterm Safety and Efficacy of Irreversible Electroporation of Malignant Liver Tumors Located Close to Major Portal or Hepatic Veins.肝脏靠近大血管恶性肿瘤的不可逆电穿孔术的中期安全性和有效性。
Radiology. 2017 Dec;285(3):1023-1031. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161561. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
8
Biliary complications and efficacy after ablation of peribiliary tumors using irreversible electroporation (IRE) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA).经不可逆电穿孔(IRE)或射频消融(RFA)消融胆管旁肿瘤后的胆道并发症和疗效。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):751-757. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2079733.
9
Ablation of perivascular hepatic malignant tumors with irreversible electroporation.不可逆电穿孔消融治疗肝血管周围恶性肿瘤。
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Sep;215(3):379-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.04.029. Epub 2012 Jun 16.
10
Colorectal liver metastatic disease: efficacy of irreversible electroporation--a single-arm phase II clinical trial (COLDFIRE-2 trial).结直肠癌肝转移疾病:不可逆电穿孔的疗效——一项单臂II期临床试验(COLDFIRE-2试验)
BMC Cancer. 2015 Oct 24;15:772. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1736-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent Advances in Ablative Therapies for HCC.肝癌消融治疗的最新进展
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025 Sep-Oct;15(5):102592. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2025.102592. Epub 2025 May 17.
2
Irreversible Electroporation of the Hepatobiliary System: Current Utilization and Future Avenues.不可逆电穿孔在肝胆系统中的应用:当前的应用和未来的发展方向。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jan 31;60(2):251. doi: 10.3390/medicina60020251.

本文引用的文献

1
Irreversible electroporation versus radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a single centre propensity-matched comparison.不可逆电穿孔与射频消融治疗肝细胞癌的比较:单中心倾向评分匹配研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug;56(8):942-947. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1930145. Epub 2021 May 30.
2
Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis.射频消融与肝切除术治疗复发性肝细胞癌:一项更新的荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov 27;20(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01544-0.
3
Irreversible Electroporation For Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Longer-Term Outcomes At A Single Centre.
不可逆电穿孔治疗肝细胞癌:单中心的长期结果。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Feb;44(2):247-253. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02666-4. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
4
Evaluation of Alterations to Bile Ducts and Laboratory Values During the First 3 Months After Irreversible Electroporation of Malignant Hepatic Tumors.恶性肝肿瘤不可逆电穿孔术后前3个月胆管及实验室检查值变化的评估
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Sep 14;12:8425-8433. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S261838. eCollection 2020.
5
Irreversible Electroporation versus Radiofrequency Ablation: Comparison of Systemic Immune Responses in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.不可逆电穿孔与射频消融治疗肝细胞癌患者的全身免疫反应比较。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Jun;30(6):845-853.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.03.002.
6
Irreversible Electroporation for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Initial Experience.不可逆电穿孔治疗不可切除肝细胞癌:初步经验
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019 Apr;42(4):584-590. doi: 10.1007/s00270-019-02164-2. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
7
Long-term survival after percutaneous irreversible electroporation of inoperable colorectal liver metastases.不可切除的结直肠癌肝转移经皮不可逆电穿孔后的长期生存情况
Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Dec 27;11:317-322. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S182091. eCollection 2019.
8
Percutaneous irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-findings during 1-year follow-up.经皮不可逆电穿孔治疗肝细胞癌:1 年随访期间的超声造影表现。
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2019;72(1):85-93. doi: 10.3233/CH-180449.
9
Midterm Safety and Efficacy of Irreversible Electroporation of Malignant Liver Tumors Located Close to Major Portal or Hepatic Veins.肝脏靠近大血管恶性肿瘤的不可逆电穿孔术的中期安全性和有效性。
Radiology. 2017 Dec;285(3):1023-1031. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161561. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
10
Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation: Long-term survival analysis of 71 patients with inoperable malignant hepatic tumors.经皮不可逆电穿孔:71 例无法手术切除的恶性肝肿瘤患者的长期生存分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 7;7:43687. doi: 10.1038/srep43687.