• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Muting Science: Input Overload Versus Scientific Advice in Swiss Policy Making During the Covid-19 Pandemic.压制科学:新冠疫情期间瑞士政策制定中的信息过载与科学建议
Polit Q. 2022 Jul-Sep;93(3):424-432. doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.13151. Epub 2022 May 31.
2
Switzerland's COVID-19 policy response: Consociational crisis management and neo-corporatist reopening.瑞士应对新冠疫情的政策举措:联合危机管理与新社团主义式的重新开放。
Eur Policy Anal. 2020 Dec;6(2):293-304. doi: 10.1002/epa2.1094. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
3
Parliament's One-Year Review of the Coronavirus Act 2020: Another Example of Parliament's Marginalisation in the Covid-19 Pandemic.议会对2020年《冠状病毒法案》的年度审查:议会在新冠疫情中被边缘化的又一实例。
Polit Q. 2021 Oct-Dec;92(4):699-706. doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.13048. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
4
Policy responses and government science advice for the COVID 19 pandemic in the Philippines: January to April 2020.菲律宾应对2019冠状病毒病疫情的政策措施及政府科学建议:2020年1月至4月
Prog Disaster Sci. 2020 Oct;7:100115. doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100115. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
5
The Dutch see Red: (in)formal science advisory bodies during the COVID-19 pandemic.荷兰人看到了红色:新冠疫情期间的(非)正式科学咨询机构。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):464. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01478-w. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
6
Public perceptions of scientific advice: toward a science savvy public culture?公众对科学建议的看法:走向有科学素养的公众文化?
Public Health. 2021 May;194:86-88. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
7
SAGE advice and political decision-making: 'Following the science' in times of epistemic uncertainty.明智的建议和政治决策:在知识不确定性时期“遵循科学”。
Soc Stud Sci. 2022 Feb;52(1):53-78. doi: 10.1177/03063127211062586. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
8
Trust and transparency in times of crisis: Results from an online survey during the first wave (April 2020) of the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK.信任与透明度在危机时期:英国 COVID-19 疫情第一波(2020 年 4 月)期间在线调查结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 16;16(2):e0239247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239247. eCollection 2021.
9
Perceptions of Canadian Federal Policy Responses to COVID-19 among People with Disabilities and Chronic Health Conditions.加拿大残疾人和慢性健康状况患者对联邦应对新冠疫情政策的看法。
Can Public Policy. 2021 Jun 19;47(2):231-251. doi: 10.3138/cpp.2021-012.
10
Challenging Expertise: Paul Feyerabend vs. Harry Collins & Robert Evans on democracy, public participation and scientific authority: Paul Feyerabend vs. Harry Collins & Robert Evans on scientific authority and public participation.挑战专业知识:保罗·费耶阿本德与哈里·柯林斯及罗伯特·埃文斯论民主、公众参与和科学权威:保罗·费耶阿本德与哈里·柯林斯及罗伯特·埃文斯论科学权威与公众参与
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2016 Jun;57:114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 15.

压制科学:新冠疫情期间瑞士政策制定中的信息过载与科学建议

Muting Science: Input Overload Versus Scientific Advice in Swiss Policy Making During the Covid-19 Pandemic.

作者信息

Armingeon Klaus, Sager Fritz

出版信息

Polit Q. 2022 Jul-Sep;93(3):424-432. doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.13151. Epub 2022 May 31.

DOI:10.1111/1467-923X.13151
PMID:35937568
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9347449/
Abstract

This article explores why the Swiss Federal Council and the Swiss Federal Parliament were reluctant to follow the majority views of the scientific epidemiological community at the beginning of the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic. We propose an institutionalist take on this question and argue that one major explanation could be the input overload that is characteristic of the Swiss federal political system. We define input overload as the simultaneous inputs of corporatist, pluralist, federalist and direct democratic subsystems. Adding another major input-this time from the scientific subsystem-may have threatened to further erode the government's and parliament's discretionary power to cope with the pandemic. We assume that the federal government reduced its input overload by fending off scientific advice.

摘要

本文探讨了在新冠疫情第二波初期,瑞士联邦委员会和瑞士联邦议会为何不愿遵循科学流行病学界的多数观点。我们提出了一种制度主义视角来分析这个问题,并认为一个主要原因可能是瑞士联邦政治体系所特有的输入过载现象。我们将输入过载定义为社团主义、多元主义、联邦主义和直接民主子系统的同时输入。再加上另一个主要输入——这次来自科学子系统——可能会威胁到进一步侵蚀政府和议会应对疫情的自由裁量权。我们假设联邦政府通过拒绝科学建议来减少其输入过载。