Armingeon Klaus, Sager Fritz
Polit Q. 2022 Jul-Sep;93(3):424-432. doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.13151. Epub 2022 May 31.
This article explores why the Swiss Federal Council and the Swiss Federal Parliament were reluctant to follow the majority views of the scientific epidemiological community at the beginning of the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic. We propose an institutionalist take on this question and argue that one major explanation could be the input overload that is characteristic of the Swiss federal political system. We define input overload as the simultaneous inputs of corporatist, pluralist, federalist and direct democratic subsystems. Adding another major input-this time from the scientific subsystem-may have threatened to further erode the government's and parliament's discretionary power to cope with the pandemic. We assume that the federal government reduced its input overload by fending off scientific advice.
本文探讨了在新冠疫情第二波初期,瑞士联邦委员会和瑞士联邦议会为何不愿遵循科学流行病学界的多数观点。我们提出了一种制度主义视角来分析这个问题,并认为一个主要原因可能是瑞士联邦政治体系所特有的输入过载现象。我们将输入过载定义为社团主义、多元主义、联邦主义和直接民主子系统的同时输入。再加上另一个主要输入——这次来自科学子系统——可能会威胁到进一步侵蚀政府和议会应对疫情的自由裁量权。我们假设联邦政府通过拒绝科学建议来减少其输入过载。