Sager Fritz, Mavrot Céline
University of Bern Bern Switzerland.
UCLA Los Angeles CA USA.
Eur Policy Anal. 2020 Dec;6(2):293-304. doi: 10.1002/epa2.1094. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
Switzerland responded to the first COVID-19 wave fairly successfully by employing both public health and economic measures. During the state of emergency, the federal government made a firm decision to flatten the infection curve and to protect especially at-risk populations. During the lockdown period, the focus of the political debate shifted from health to the economy as the Federal Council (i.e., the national executive) started to prepare for the country's reopening. While government still had full power due to the emergency situation defined under national epidemic law, the shift in the debate also meant a shift in the way that the government made decisions. Switzerland is a power-sharing consociational democracy with strong neo-corporatist features. While the executive untypically relied heavily on health experts within and outside the administration during the lockdown, the reopening strategy shows clear features of Swiss neo-corporatism, including the resurgence and influence of the traditional big economic vested interests over the government's approach to decision making.
瑞士通过采取公共卫生和经济措施,较为成功地应对了第一波新冠疫情。在紧急状态期间,联邦政府坚定地做出了压低感染曲线、特别保护高危人群的决定。在封锁期间,随着联邦委员会(即国家行政机构)开始为国家重新开放做准备,政治辩论的焦点从健康转向了经济。虽然由于国家疫情法规定的紧急情况,政府仍然拥有全部权力,但辩论的转变也意味着政府决策方式的转变。瑞士是一个具有强大新社团主义特征的权力分享的协商民主国家。在封锁期间,行政部门不同寻常地严重依赖政府内部和外部的健康专家,而重新开放战略则显示出瑞士新社团主义的明显特征,包括传统的大型经济既得利益集团对政府决策方式的复苏和影响。