• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Who Gets to Breastfeed? A Narrative Ecological Analysis of Women's Infant Feeding Experiences in the UK.谁能进行母乳喂养?对英国女性婴儿喂养经历的叙事性生态分析。
Front Sociol. 2022 Jul 22;7:904773. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.904773. eCollection 2022.
2
Exploring the use and experience of an infant feeding genogram to facilitate an assets-based approach to support infant feeding.探讨使用和体验婴儿喂养系谱图,以促进基于资产的方法来支持婴儿喂养。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03245-8.
3
UK women's experiences of breastfeeding and additional breastfeeding support: a qualitative study of Baby Café services.英国女性的母乳喂养经历及额外的母乳喂养支持:对母婴咖啡馆服务的定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Jul 7;15:147. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0581-5.
4
'Surely you're not still breastfeeding': a qualitative exploration of women's experiences of breastfeeding beyond infancy in the UK.“你肯定不再母乳喂养了吧”:对英国女性在婴儿期之后母乳喂养经历的质性探索
BMJ Open. 2020 May 26;10(5):e035199. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035199.
5
A meta-synthesis of women's perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support.关于女性对母乳喂养支持的认知与经历的元综合分析。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(14):583-614. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907140-00001.
6
Protocol for a feasibility trial for improving breast feeding initiation and continuation: assets-based infant feeding help before and after birth (ABA).改善母乳喂养启动和持续率的可行性试验方案:基于资产的出生前后婴儿喂养帮助(ABA)
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 23;8(1):e019142. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019142.
7
Indicators of 'good' feeding, breastfeeding latch, and feeding experiences among healthy women with healthy infants: A qualitative pathway analysis using Grounded Theory.健康母婴的“良好”喂养、母乳喂养衔接和喂养体验指标:基于扎根理论的定性途径分析。
Women Birth. 2021 Jul;34(4):e357-e367. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
8
Adapting breastfeeding support in areas of socio-economic deprivation: a case study approach.适应社会经济贫困地区的母乳喂养支持:案例研究方法。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 20;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01393-7.
9
Women's and peer supporters' experiences of an assets-based peer support intervention for increasing breastfeeding initiation and continuation: A qualitative study.妇女和同伴支持者对基于资产的同伴支持干预措施增加母乳喂养开始和持续的经验:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):622-631. doi: 10.1111/hex.13042. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
10

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Multifactorial Barriers Related to Breastfeeding.母乳喂养相关多因素障碍的系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 23;13(11):1225. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13111225.
2
Is there a role for nutritional advice during breastfeeding for infant colic relief? A mixed-method study.母乳喂养期间提供营养建议对缓解婴儿腹绞痛是否有作用?一项混合方法研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 28;11(1):e41562. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41562. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
3
Breastfeeding in primiparous women with congenital heart disease - a register study.先天性心脏病初产妇母乳喂养情况的注册研究。
Int Breastfeed J. 2024 Mar 20;19(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13006-024-00627-y.
4
Breastfeeding rates in England during the Covid-19 pandemic and the previous decade: Analysis of national surveys and routine data.英格兰在新冠疫情期间和前十年的母乳喂养率:全国调查和常规数据分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 11;18(10):e0291907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291907. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions and policy approaches to promote equity in breastfeeding.促进母乳喂养公平性的干预措施和政策方法。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 May 10;21(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01670-z.
2
Impact of baby behaviour on caregiver's infant feeding decisions during the first 6 months of life: A systematic review.婴儿行为对 6 个月内照料者婴儿喂养决策的影响:系统评价。
Matern Child Nutr. 2022 May;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e13345. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13345. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
3
Risk factors for self-reported insufficient milk during the first 6 months of life: A systematic review.自我报告的婴儿在生命的头 6 个月中母乳不足的风险因素:系统评价。
Matern Child Nutr. 2022 May;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e13353. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13353. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
4
What works to protect, promote and support breastfeeding on a large scale: A review of reviews.大规模保护、促进和支持母乳喂养的有效措施:系统评价综述。
Matern Child Nutr. 2022 May;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e13344. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13344. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
5
Overcoming barriers to breastfeeding.克服母乳喂养障碍。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Sep;83:60-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.010. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
6
The rates and factors of perceived insufficient milk supply: A systematic review.认为母乳不足的发生率和影响因素:系统评价。
Matern Child Nutr. 2022 Jan;18(1):e13255. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13255. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
7
Examining supports and barriers to breastfeeding through a socio-ecological lens: a qualitative study.从社会生态视角审视母乳喂养的支持因素和障碍:一项定性研究。
Int Breastfeed J. 2021 Jul 12;16(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13006-021-00401-4.
8
Guilt, shame, and postpartum infant feeding outcomes: A systematic review.内疚、羞耻与产后母乳喂养结果:一项系统综述
Matern Child Nutr. 2021 Jul;17(3):e13141. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13141. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
9
Exploring the use and experience of an infant feeding genogram to facilitate an assets-based approach to support infant feeding.探讨使用和体验婴儿喂养系谱图,以促进基于资产的方法来支持婴儿喂养。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03245-8.
10
Women's and peer supporters' experiences of an assets-based peer support intervention for increasing breastfeeding initiation and continuation: A qualitative study.妇女和同伴支持者对基于资产的同伴支持干预措施增加母乳喂养开始和持续的经验:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):622-631. doi: 10.1111/hex.13042. Epub 2020 Mar 21.

谁能进行母乳喂养?对英国女性婴儿喂养经历的叙事性生态分析。

Who Gets to Breastfeed? A Narrative Ecological Analysis of Women's Infant Feeding Experiences in the UK.

作者信息

Thomson Gill, Ingram Jenny, Clarke Joanne, Johnson Debbie, Jolly Kate

机构信息

School of Community Health & Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.

Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Sociol. 2022 Jul 22;7:904773. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.904773. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2022.904773
PMID:35938089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9352850/
Abstract

The early post-natal period is a critical period in women's infant feeding journeys, often marked by high levels of unintended breastfeeding cessation. Previous research has argued that infant feeding should be perceived within a complex system whereby factors operating at different ecological levels (i.e., individual, social/community networks, cultural/institutional) interact to affect individual behaviors. However, currently, more work needs to be done to implement an ecological approach in breastfeeding programs. We adopted a complex-systems lens approach to explore how multi-level factors-individual, mother-infant dyad, health service, family and social networks, and wider community infrastructure-interacted with women's motivations and experiences of breastfeeding. We undertook a secondary analysis of 24 women's interviews; all the women had a strong antenatal intention to breastfeed and were expecting their first baby. The interviews were collected during the UK-based Assets-based feeding help Before and After birth (ABA) feasibility trial when their infant was aged between 4 and 21 weeks. Categorical content analysis was used to explore the interrelationships between key factors and to identify different infant feeding typologies. Two different typologies emerged: "disappointed" ( = 7) and "by hook or by crook" ( = 17). "Disappointed" women had stopped breastfeeding early; women classified as "by hook or by crook" continued breastfeeding despite facing challenges. Sociodemographic, social, and service level differences between the typologies were noted. "Disappointed" women were more likely to be younger, White-British, to have considered mixed-feeding antenatally and experienced negative breastfeeding support from healthcare professionals and personal networks. Infants of "disappointed" women were more likely to have received unexpected "top-ups" and to be perceived as having infant feeding difficulties. Women classified as "by hook or by crook" were just as likely as "disappointed" women to experience birth-related complications, but demonstrated more proactive help-seeking behaviors, had positive experiences of personal/professional support and accessed wider support. While further research is needed to consolidate and/or refute the typologies, the ecological approach shifts the focus away from mothers' decisions to consider the multi-level factors that need to be in place to enable women to breastfeed successfully. Further work to encourage help-seeking behaviors and toward improving facilities, support, and services is needed.

摘要

产后早期是女性母乳喂养过程中的关键时期,这一时期往往以意外停止母乳喂养的高发生率为特征。以往的研究认为,应在一个复杂的系统中看待婴儿喂养问题,在这个系统中,不同生态层面(即个人、社会/社区网络、文化/机构)的因素相互作用,影响个体行为。然而,目前在母乳喂养项目中实施生态方法仍需开展更多工作。我们采用了一种复杂系统视角的方法,来探究多层次因素——个人、母婴二元组、卫生服务、家庭和社会网络以及更广泛的社区基础设施——如何与女性的母乳喂养动机和经历相互作用。我们对24名女性的访谈进行了二次分析;所有女性在产前都有强烈的母乳喂养意愿,且都怀有第一胎。这些访谈是在英国一项基于资产的出生前后喂养帮助(ABA)可行性试验期间收集的,当时她们的婴儿年龄在4至21周之间。采用分类内容分析法来探究关键因素之间的相互关系,并识别不同的婴儿喂养类型。出现了两种不同的类型:“失望型”(=7)和“千方百计型”(=17)。“失望型”女性早早停止了母乳喂养;被归类为“千方百计型”的女性尽管面临挑战仍继续母乳喂养。我们注意到了这两种类型在社会人口统计学、社会和服务层面上的差异。“失望型”女性更可能较年轻、是英国白人,产前考虑过混合喂养,并且在医护专业人员和个人社交网络方面获得过负面的母乳喂养支持。“失望型”女性的婴儿更可能接受过意外的“额外喂养”,并且被认为存在婴儿喂养困难。被归类为“千方百计型”的女性与“失望型”女性经历与分娩相关并发症的可能性相同,但表现出更积极的求助行为,有个人/专业支持的积极体验,并且获得了更广泛的支持。虽然需要进一步研究来巩固和/或反驳这些类型,但生态方法将关注点从母亲的决定上转移开,转而考虑为使女性能够成功进行母乳喂养而需要具备的多层次因素。需要开展进一步工作来鼓励求助行为,并改善设施、支持和服务。