• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球耳鸣的患病率和发病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Global Prevalence and Incidence of Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

JAMA Neurol. 2022 Sep 1;79(9):888-900. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2189.

DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2189
PMID:35939312
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9361184/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

To date, no systematic review has taken a meta-analytic approach to estimating the prevalence and incidence of tinnitus in the general population.

OBJECTIVE

To provide frequency estimates of tinnitus worldwide.

DATA SOURCES

An umbrella review followed by a traditional systematic review was performed by searching PubMed-MEDLINE and Embase from inception through November 19, 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Research data from the general population were selected, and studies based on patients or on subgroups of the population with selected lifestyle habits were excluded. No restrictions were applied according to date, age, sex, and country.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Relevant extracted information included type of study, time and location, end point, population characteristics, and tinnitus definition. The study followed the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guideline.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Pooled prevalence estimates of any tinnitus, severe tinnitus, chronic tinnitus, and diagnosed tinnitus as well as incidence of tinnitus were obtained using random-effects meta-analytic models; heterogeneity between studies was controlled using the χ2 test, and inconsistency was measured using the I2 statistic.

RESULTS

Among 767 publications, 113 eligible articles published between 1972 and 2021 were identified, and prevalence estimates from 83 articles and incidence estimates from 12 articles were extracted. The pooled prevalence of any tinnitus among adults was 14.4% (95% CI, 12.6%-16.5%) and ranged from 4.1% (95% CI, 3.7%-4.4%) to 37.2% (95% CI, 34.6%-39.9%). Prevalence estimates did not significantly differ by sex (14.1% [95% CI, 11.6%-17.0%] among male individuals; 13.1% [95% CI, 10.5%-16.2%] among female individuals), but increased prevalence was associated with age (9.7% [95% CI, 7.4%-12.5%] among adults aged 18-44 years; 13.7% [95% CI, 11.0%-17.0%] among those aged 45-64 years; and 23.6% [95% CI, 19.4%-28.5%] among those aged ≥65 years; P < .001 among age groups). The pooled prevalence of severe tinnitus was 2.3% (95% CI, 1.7%-3.1%), ranging from 0.5% (95% CI, 0.3%-0.7%) to 12.6% (95% CI, 11.1%-14.1%). The pooled prevalence of chronic tinnitus was 9.8% (95% CI, 4.7%-19.3%) and the pooled prevalence of diagnosed tinnitus was 3.4% (95% CI, 2.1%-5.5%). The pooled incidence rate of any tinnitus was 1164 per 100 000 person-years (95% CI, 479-2828 per 100 000 person-years).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Despite the substantial heterogeneity among studies, this comprehensive systematic review on the prevalence and incidence of tinnitus suggests that tinnitus affects more than 740 million adults globally and is perceived as a major problem by more than 120 million people, mostly aged 65 years or older. Health policy makers should consider the global burden of tinnitus, and greater effort should be devoted to boost research on tinnitus.

摘要

重要性

迄今为止,尚无系统评价采用荟萃分析方法来估计普通人群中耳鸣的患病率和发病率。

目的

提供全球耳鸣的频率估计值。

数据来源

通过检索 PubMed-MEDLINE 和 Embase,从成立到 2021 年 11 月 19 日进行了伞式综述和传统系统综述。

研究选择

选择了来自普通人群的研究数据,并排除了基于患者或具有特定生活方式习惯的人群的研究。根据日期、年龄、性别和国家没有任何限制。

数据提取和综合

相关提取信息包括研究类型、时间和地点、终点、人口特征和耳鸣定义。该研究遵循观察性研究荟萃分析(MOOSE)报告指南。

主要结果和措施

使用随机效应荟萃分析模型获得任何耳鸣、严重耳鸣、慢性耳鸣和诊断性耳鸣的汇总患病率估计值;使用 χ2 检验控制研究间的异质性,并使用 I2 统计测量不一致性。

结果

在 767 篇出版物中,确定了 113 篇发表于 1972 年至 2021 年的合格文章,并从 83 篇文章中提取了患病率估计值和 12 篇文章的发病率估计值。成年人中任何耳鸣的汇总患病率为 14.4%(95%CI,12.6%-16.5%),范围从 4.1%(95%CI,3.7%-4.4%)到 37.2%(95%CI,34.6%-39.9%)。性别间的患病率估计值无显著差异(14.1%[95%CI,11.6%-17.0%]在男性个体中;13.1%[95%CI,10.5%-16.2%]在女性个体中),但随着年龄的增长,患病率增加(18-44 岁的成年人中为 9.7%[95%CI,7.4%-12.5%];45-64 岁的成年人中为 13.7%[95%CI,11.0%-17.0%];65 岁及以上的成年人中为 23.6%[95%CI,19.4%-28.5%];组间差异有统计学意义,P<0.001)。严重耳鸣的汇总患病率为 2.3%(95%CI,1.7%-3.1%),范围从 0.5%(95%CI,0.3%-0.7%)到 12.6%(95%CI,11.1%-14.1%)。慢性耳鸣的汇总患病率为 9.8%(95%CI,4.7%-19.3%),诊断性耳鸣的汇总患病率为 3.4%(95%CI,2.1%-5.5%)。任何耳鸣的汇总发病率为 1164/100000 人年(95%CI,479-2828/100000 人年)。

结论和相关性

尽管研究间存在很大的异质性,但这项关于耳鸣患病率和发病率的综合系统评价表明,耳鸣影响了全球超过 7.4 亿成年人,超过 1.2 亿人认为耳鸣是一个主要问题,其中大多数人年龄在 65 岁或以上。卫生政策制定者应考虑耳鸣的全球负担,并加大努力提高耳鸣研究水平。

相似文献

1
Global Prevalence and Incidence of Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.全球耳鸣的患病率和发病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Sep 1;79(9):888-900. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2189.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
4
Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.全球儿童 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病视网膜病变的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231887. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1887.
5
A systematic review of the reporting of tinnitus prevalence and severity.耳鸣患病率及严重程度报告的系统评价
Hear Res. 2016 Jul;337:70-9. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 May 28.
6
Global Prevalence and Incidence Estimates of Oral Lichen Planus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.全球口腔扁平苔藓的患病率和发病率估计:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Feb 1;156(2):172-181. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.3797.
7
Global Incidence of Frailty and Prefrailty Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.全球社区居住的老年人群中衰弱和衰弱前期的发病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198398. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8398.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
10
Prevalence and incidence of hepatitis C virus infection in men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.男男性行为者中丙型肝炎病毒感染的流行率和发病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan;6(1):39-56. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30303-4. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The Causal Relationship Between Circulating Inflammatory Proteins and Tinnitus: A Mendelian Randomization Study Mediated by Blood Metabolites.循环炎症蛋白与耳鸣之间的因果关系:一项由血液代谢物介导的孟德尔随机化研究
Brain Behav. 2025 Sep;15(9):e70699. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70699.
2
Frailty links the heterogeneity of tinnitus disorder and response to interventions in older patients.衰弱与耳鸣障碍的异质性以及老年患者对干预措施的反应相关。
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 12;16:1617821. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1617821. eCollection 2025.
3
Association Between SGLT2 Inhibitor Therapy and the Incidence of Tinnitus in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.2型糖尿病患者中SGLT2抑制剂治疗与耳鸣发生率的关联:一项回顾性队列研究
Audiol Res. 2025 Aug 9;15(4):102. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15040102.
4
Auditory illusory models as proxies to investigate bottom-up and top-down neural networks of phantom perception.听觉幻觉模型作为研究幻肢感知的自下而上和自上而下神经网络的替代物。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 May 9;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00574. eCollection 2025.
5
Relationship between Subjective Hearing Loss and Work-related and Somatic Issues in the Working-age Population: A Large-scale Internet-based Cross-sectional Study.工作年龄人群主观听力损失与工作相关问题和躯体问题之间的关系:一项基于互联网的大规模横断面研究。
JMA J. 2025 Jul 15;8(3):753-765. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0430. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
6
Anti-neuroinflammatory therapy for non-pulsatile tinnitus in patients with sinus vascular anomalies: preliminary result on two cases.鼻窦血管异常患者非搏动性耳鸣的抗神经炎症治疗:两例初步结果
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 23;16:1558196. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1558196. eCollection 2025.
7
Identifying psychological and clinical risk factors for moderate-to-severe tinnitus in older patients with hearing loss: a multivariable prediction model.识别老年听力损失患者中重度耳鸣的心理和临床风险因素:多变量预测模型
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 23;16:1647071. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1647071. eCollection 2025.
8
The daily auditory environments of people with tinnitus.耳鸣患者的日常听觉环境。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 30;15(1):27756. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10730-7.
9
Causal Effects of Gut Microbiome on Tinnitus: A Mendelian Randomization Study.肠道微生物群对耳鸣的因果效应:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jul 22;18:4159-4172. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S525502. eCollection 2025.
10
Korean medicine combination treatment for chronic tinnitus unresponsive to conventional treatment: A case report and review of literature.韩医综合疗法治疗对传统治疗无反应的慢性耳鸣:一例病例报告及文献综述
World J Clin Cases. 2025 Jul 26;13(21):103200. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i21.103200.