Sharot Tali, Rollwage Max, Sunstein Cass R, Fleming Stephen M
Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London.
Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Jan;18(1):142-151. doi: 10.1177/17456916221082967. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
Why people do or do not change their beliefs has been a long-standing puzzle. Sometimes people hold onto false beliefs despite ample contradictory evidence; sometimes they change their beliefs without sufficient reason. Here, we propose that the utility of a belief is derived from the potential outcomes associated with holding it. Outcomes can be internal (e.g., positive/negative feelings) or external (e.g., material gain/loss), and only some are dependent on belief accuracy. Belief change can then be understood as an economic transaction in which the multidimensional utility of the old belief is compared against that of the new belief. Change will occur when potential outcomes alter across attributes, for example because of changing environments or when certain outcomes are made more or less salient.
人们为何改变或不改变自己的信念,这一直是个长期存在的谜题。有时,尽管有大量矛盾证据,人们仍坚持错误信念;有时,他们毫无充分理由就改变信念。在此,我们提出,一种信念的效用源自与持有该信念相关的潜在结果。结果可以是内在的(例如,积极/消极情绪)或外在的(例如,物质收获/损失),且只有一些结果取决于信念的准确性。信念改变因而可被理解为一种经济交易,其中旧信念的多维效用与新信念的多维效用相比较。当潜在结果在各属性间发生变化时,例如由于环境改变或某些结果变得或多或少显著时,改变就会发生。