• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲的研究伦理培训、挑战和改进建议:欧洲放射学研究伦理标准(RRESFE)。

Research ethics training, challenges, and suggested improvements across Europe: Radiography research ethics standards for Europe (RRESFE).

机构信息

Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland.

Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Radiography (Lond). 2022 Nov;28(4):1016-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2022.07.004
PMID:35939960
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Radiography Research Ethics Standards for Europe (RRESFE) project aimed to provide a cross-sectional view of the current state of radiography research ethics across Europe. This included investigating education and training in research ethics, and identifying the key challenges and potential improvements associated with using existing research ethics frameworks.

METHODS

This cross-sectional online survey targeting radiography researchers in Europe was conducted between April 26 and July 12, 2021. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used to identify research ethics education and training trends. Content analysis of qualitative responses was employed to identify significant challenges and proposed improvements in research ethics frameworks of practice.

RESULTS

There were 232 responses received across 33 European countries. Most (n = 132; 57%) respondents had received some research ethics training; however, fewer participants had received training on safeguarding vulnerable patients (n = 72; 38%), diversity and inclusivity (n = 62; 33%), or research with healthy volunteers (n = 60; 32%). Training was associated with a greater perceived importance of the need for research ethics review (p = 0.031) and with the establishment of EQF Level 6 training (p = 0.038). The proportion of formally trained researchers also varied by region (p = <0.001). Time-to-ethics-approval was noted as the biggest challenge for professionals making research ethics applications.

CONCLUSION

Early and universal integration of research-oriented teaching within the radiography education framework which emphasises research ethics is recommended. Additionally, study findings suggest research ethics committee application and approval processes could be further simplified and streamlined.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The survey contributes to a growing body of knowledge surrounding the importance of education and training in research ethics for assuring a high standard of research outputs in Radiography and has identified hurdles to obtaining research ethics approval for further investigation and address.

摘要

简介

欧洲放射学研究伦理标准(RRESFE)项目旨在提供欧洲当前放射学研究伦理状况的横断面视图。这包括调查研究伦理教育和培训,并确定与使用现有研究伦理框架相关的主要挑战和潜在改进。

方法

这项针对欧洲放射学研究人员的横断面在线调查于 2021 年 4 月 26 日至 7 月 12 日进行。使用描述性和分析性统计数据来确定研究伦理教育和培训趋势。对定性回应的内容分析用于确定实践中研究伦理框架的重大挑战和拟议改进。

结果

在 33 个欧洲国家共收到 232 份回复。大多数(n=132;57%)受访者接受过一些研究伦理培训;然而,接受过保护弱势患者(n=72;38%)、多样性和包容性(n=62;33%)或健康志愿者研究(n=60;32%)培训的参与者较少。培训与对研究伦理审查必要性的更大感知重要性(p=0.031)和 EQF 水平 6 培训的建立(p=0.038)相关。受过正式培训的研究人员的比例也因地区而异(p<0.001)。专业人员在提出研究伦理申请时,注意到获得伦理批准的时间是最大的挑战。

结论

建议在放射学教育框架内尽早和普遍纳入强调研究伦理的面向研究的教学。此外,研究结果表明,研究伦理委员会的申请和批准程序可以进一步简化和精简。

实践意义

该调查为研究伦理教育在确保放射学研究成果高标准方面的重要性提供了更多的知识,并确定了获得研究伦理批准的障碍,以便进一步调查和解决。

相似文献

1
Research ethics training, challenges, and suggested improvements across Europe: Radiography research ethics standards for Europe (RRESFE).欧洲的研究伦理培训、挑战和改进建议:欧洲放射学研究伦理标准(RRESFE)。
Radiography (Lond). 2022 Nov;28(4):1016-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
2
Research ethics systems, processes, and awareness across Europe: Radiography research ethics standards for Europe (RRESFE).欧洲的研究伦理体系、流程和意识:欧洲放射学研究伦理标准(RRESFE)。
Radiography (Lond). 2022 Nov;28(4):1032-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
3
Clinical radiography education across Europe.欧洲的临床放射学教育
Radiography (Lond). 2017 Sep;23 Suppl 1:S7-S15. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
4
Does teaching medical ethics ensure good knowledge, attitude, and reported practice? An ethical vignette-based cross-sectional survey among doctors in a tertiary teaching hospital in Nepal.教授医学伦理学是否能确保医生具备良好的知识、态度和报告实践?尼泊尔一家三级教学医院基于伦理案例的医生横断面调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Aug 5;22(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00676-6.
5
Evaluation of ethics education in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs.妇产科住院医师培训项目中的伦理教育评估。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):397.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.027. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
6
An interprofessional cohort analysis of student interest in medical ethics education: a survey-based quantitative study.一项关于学生对医学伦理教育兴趣的跨专业队列分析:一项基于调查的定量研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Apr 8;21(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00468-4.
7
Inclusion of evidence and research in European radiography curricula.纳入证据和研究在欧洲放射学课程中。
Radiography (Lond). 2020 Oct;26 Suppl 2:S45-S48. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.04.018. Epub 2020 May 19.
8
Paediatric Residents and Fellows Ethics (PERFEct) survey: perceptions of European trainees regarding ethical dilemmas.儿科住院医师和研究员伦理学(PERFEct)调查:欧洲受训者对伦理困境的看法。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Feb;181(2):561-570. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04231-8. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
9
10
Liberal arts and ethics education in nursing: A national survey.护理中的文科和伦理教育:一项全国性调查。
J Prof Nurs. 2022 Sep-Oct;42:73-88. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jun 14.