• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲的研究伦理体系、流程和意识:欧洲放射学研究伦理标准(RRESFE)。

Research ethics systems, processes, and awareness across Europe: Radiography research ethics standards for Europe (RRESFE).

机构信息

Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland.

Division of Midwifery and Radiography, School of Health Sciences, City University of London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Radiography (Lond). 2022 Nov;28(4):1032-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2022.07.002
PMID:35964488
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Radiography Research Ethics Standards for Europe (RRESFE) project aims to provide a cross-sectional snapshot of current research ethics systems, processes, and awareness of such, across Europe together with identifying the associated challenges, education, and training needs.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey targeting radiography researchers in Europe was conducted. Data collection took place between April 26 and July 12, 2021, using a snowball sampling approach. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used to identify trends in research ethics frameworks across Europe.

RESULTS

285 responses were received across 33 European and 23 non-European countries. Most (n = 221; 95%) European respondents stated ethics approval is required before commencing research in their country. Requirements around research ethics approval and awareness of such requirements varied by European region (X (2, n = 129) = 7.234, p = 0.013) and were found to differ depending on the type of research participant and study design. Additionally, European respondents reported ethics approval is a national requirement more often than their non-European counterparts (X (1, n = 282) = 4.316, p = 0.049). Requirements for ethics approval were also associated with the undergraduate programme duration (2-year vs. 3-year vs. 3.5 year vs. 4-year vs. multiple programme durations; X (4, n = 231) = 10.075, p = 0.016) and availability of postgraduate training (postgraduate training available vs. postgraduate training not available; X (1, n = 231) = 15.448, p = <0.001) within respondents' country.

CONCLUSION

Respondents from countries with longer programme durations/availability of multiple programme lengths, availability of postgraduate training, and establishment of European Qualifications Framework Level 6 were generally associated with less uncertainty and more comprehensive research ethics requirements.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Results are informative of the current status of research ethics within evidence-based radiography.

摘要

简介

放射学研究伦理标准在欧洲(RRESFE)项目旨在提供一个欧洲当前研究伦理系统、流程和意识的横断面快照,同时确定相关挑战、教育和培训需求。

方法

针对欧洲的放射学研究人员进行了横断面在线调查。数据收集于 2021 年 4 月 26 日至 7 月 12 日期间采用滚雪球抽样法进行。使用描述性和分析性统计数据来确定欧洲研究伦理框架的趋势。

结果

在 33 个欧洲国家和 23 个非欧洲国家共收到 285 份回复。大多数(n=221;95%)欧洲受访者表示,在本国开展研究前需要获得伦理批准。欧洲地区的研究伦理批准要求和对这些要求的认识存在差异(X(2,n=129)=7.234,p=0.013),并发现因研究参与者的类型和研究设计而异。此外,欧洲受访者比非欧洲受访者更频繁地报告说,伦理批准是国家要求(X(1,n=282)=4.316,p=0.049)。对伦理批准的要求还与本科课程持续时间相关(2 年制与 3 年制与 3.5 年制与 4 年制与多种课程持续时间;X(4,n=231)=10.075,p=0.016)和研究生培训的可用性(有研究生培训与无研究生培训;X(1,n=231)=15.448,p<0.001)。

结论

来自课程持续时间较长/有多种课程长度、有研究生培训以及建立欧洲资格框架 6 级的国家的受访者,通常与不确定性较小和更全面的研究伦理要求相关。

实践意义

结果为循证放射学中当前研究伦理状况提供了信息。

相似文献

1
Research ethics systems, processes, and awareness across Europe: Radiography research ethics standards for Europe (RRESFE).欧洲的研究伦理体系、流程和意识:欧洲放射学研究伦理标准(RRESFE)。
Radiography (Lond). 2022 Nov;28(4):1032-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
2
Research ethics training, challenges, and suggested improvements across Europe: Radiography research ethics standards for Europe (RRESFE).欧洲的研究伦理培训、挑战和改进建议:欧洲放射学研究伦理标准(RRESFE)。
Radiography (Lond). 2022 Nov;28(4):1016-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
3
Family Violence Curricula in Europe (FAVICUE): a cross-sectional descriptive study protocol.家庭暴力课程在欧洲(FAVICUE):一个跨部门的描述性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 5;9(2):e024519. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024519.
4
A survey of perceived problems in orthodontic education in 23 European countries.一项对23个欧洲国家正畸教育中感知到的问题的调查。
J Orthod. 2000 Dec;27(4):343-8. doi: 10.1093/ortho/27.4.343.
5
European postgraduate training in geriatric medicine: data of a systematic international survey.欧洲老年医学研究生培训:一项系统性国际调查的数据
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2015 Oct;27(5):741-50. doi: 10.1007/s40520-015-0416-2. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
6
Awareness and perceptions of medical students and doctors regarding Tropical Medicine education and training in Europe: An international, online-based survey.医学专业学生和医生对欧洲热带医学教育和培训的认识和看法:一项国际在线调查。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2022 Jul-Aug;48:102323. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102323. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
7
Identification of ethics committees based on authors' disclosures: cross-sectional study of articles published in the European Journal of Anaesthesiology and a survey of ethics committees.基于作者披露信息识别伦理委员会:对发表于《欧洲麻醉学杂志》的文章的横断面研究及对伦理委员会的调查
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jun 8;19(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0289-y.
8
Methodological challenges in European ethics approvals for a genetic epidemiology study in critically ill patients: the GenOSept experience.欧洲伦理审批在危重病患者遗传流行病学研究中的方法学挑战:GenOSept 经验。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 May 7;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0370-1.
9
Ethical procedures and patient consent differ in Europe.欧洲的伦理程序和患者同意情况有所不同。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):126-31. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000206.
10
Clinical radiography education across Europe.欧洲的临床放射学教育
Radiography (Lond). 2017 Sep;23 Suppl 1:S7-S15. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The creation of an adaptable informed consent form for research purposes to overcome national and institutional bottlenecks in ethics review: experience from rare disease registries.创建一份适用于研究目的的知情同意书,以克服伦理审查中的国家和机构瓶颈:来自罕见病登记处的经验。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 17;11:1384026. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1384026. eCollection 2024.
2
Responsible AI practice and AI education are central to AI implementation: a rapid review for all medical imaging professionals in Europe.负责任的人工智能实践与人工智能教育是人工智能实施的核心:欧洲所有医学影像专业人员的快速回顾
BJR Open. 2023 Jun 30;5(1):20230033. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20230033. eCollection 2023.