Department of Pediatrics, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX.
Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
J Pediatr. 2022 Dec;251:6-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.07.017. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
To synthesize and describe important elements of decision-making during antenatal consultation for threatened preterm delivery at the margin of gestational viability.
Data sources including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CINAHL Plus were searched. We included all qualitative literature published on decision-making from 1990 to July 2021. Two authors independently screened and evaluated each study using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist; studies reaching moderate and high quality were included. We developed an extraction tool to collect and categorize data from each qualitative article, then used thematic analysis to analyze and describe the findings.
Twenty-five articles incorporating the views of 504 providers and 352 parents were included for final review. Thematic analysis revealed 4 main themes describing the experience of health care providers and parents participating in decision-making: factors that influence decision-making, information sharing, building a partnership, and making the decision. Parents and providers were not always in agreement upon which elements were most essential to the process of decision-making. Articles published in languages other than English were excluded.
Qualitative literature highlighting key factors which are important during antenatal counseling can inform and guide providers through the process of shared decision-making. Communicating clear, honest, and balanced information; avoiding artificially dichotomized options; and focusing on partnership building with families will help providers use the antenatal consultation to reach personalized decisions for each infant.
综合描述极早产儿分娩边缘情况下产前咨询决策的重要因素。
检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 CINAHL Plus 等数据源。纳入了 1990 年至 2021 年 7 月发表的所有关于决策制定的定性文献。两位作者使用批判性评估技能计划清单独立筛选和评估每项研究;纳入了质量为中、高度的研究。我们开发了一个提取工具,从每篇定性文章中收集和分类数据,然后使用主题分析来分析和描述研究结果。
最终纳入了 25 篇文章,其中包含了 504 名提供者和 352 名父母的观点。主题分析揭示了 4 个主要主题,描述了参与决策制定的医疗保健提供者和父母的体验:影响决策制定的因素、信息共享、建立伙伴关系以及做出决策。父母和提供者在哪些因素对决策过程最重要的问题上并不总是一致。排除了发表在英语以外语言的文章。
定性文献强调了在产前咨询中重要的关键因素,可以为提供者提供信息并指导他们进行共同决策。沟通清晰、诚实和平衡的信息;避免人为地将选项二分法;并专注于与家庭建立伙伴关系,将有助于提供者利用产前咨询为每个婴儿做出个性化的决策。