• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨 2021 年威斯康星州因经济压力和资源匮乏而导致人们无法选择理想避孕方法的问题。

Exploring financial stress and resource deprivation as barriers to preferred contraceptive use in Wisconsin in 2021.

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Collaborative for Reproductive Equity (CORE), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.

Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.

出版信息

Contraception. 2022 Nov;115:22-26. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.07.014. Epub 2022 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2022.07.014
PMID:35940300
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed a broad array of socioeconomic barriers in relation to preferred contraceptive use during a time of exacerbated personal and social financial strain (the COVID-19 pandemic).

STUDY DESIGN

Using statewide data collected in early 2021 through the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin, we conducted bivariate analyses exploring the relationship between socioeconomic resources and preferred contraceptive use among Wisconsin women.

RESULTS

The survey garnered 1889 responses, with a response rate of 34%. The sample for the current study (N = 247) included only adult women of reproductive age who reported current contraceptive use. Nearly one-third (32.8%) of contraceptive users reported that they were not using their preferred method. We found that greater resource deprivation, including housing instability (had to relocate: p = 0.004; unable to pay rent and/or mortgage: p = 0.008), food insecurity (ran out of food: p = 0.003; worried about running out of food: p = 0.008), and greater financial stress (p < 0.001), were significantly associated with lowered likelihood of using one's preferred contraceptive method.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicated that people lacking socioeconomic resources, including adequate food and housing, may be unable to access their preferred contraceptive method(s). Amidst competing demands on time and resources, the inability to obtain preferred contraceptive method(s) may represent system-wide barriers as well as people's lowered ability to prioritize and access care in light of socioeconomic struggles.

IMPLICATIONS

Health care providers and health systems should work to address structural barriers to care and bolster community resources in ways that promote patients' reproductive autonomy. There is also a need for continued research on specific socioeconomic determinants of preferred contraceptive use and potential solutions that bolster community resources.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了在个人和社会经济压力加剧时期(COVID-19 大流行期间)与首选避孕措施使用相关的广泛社会经济障碍。

研究设计

使用 2021 年初通过威斯康星州健康调查收集的全州数据,我们进行了单变量分析,探讨了威斯康星州女性的社会经济资源与首选避孕措施使用之间的关系。

结果

该调查共收到 1889 份回复,回复率为 34%。本研究的样本(N=247)仅包括报告当前使用避孕措施的成年育龄妇女。近三分之一(32.8%)的避孕使用者表示他们没有使用自己首选的方法。我们发现,资源匮乏程度更高,包括住房不稳定(不得不搬迁:p=0.004;无法支付租金和/或抵押贷款:p=0.008)、食物不安全(食物用尽:p=0.003;担心食物用尽:p=0.008)和更大的经济压力(p<0.001),与使用首选避孕方法的可能性降低显著相关。

结论

研究结果表明,缺乏社会经济资源的人,包括充足的食物和住房,可能无法获得他们首选的避孕方法。在时间和资源竞争的情况下,无法获得首选避孕方法可能代表了系统层面的障碍,以及人们在面临社会经济困难时降低了优先考虑和获得护理的能力。

意义

医疗保健提供者和医疗系统应努力解决护理方面的结构性障碍,并通过促进患者的生殖自主权来加强社区资源。还需要继续研究首选避孕措施使用的具体社会经济决定因素和加强社区资源的潜在解决方案。

相似文献

1
Exploring financial stress and resource deprivation as barriers to preferred contraceptive use in Wisconsin in 2021.探讨 2021 年威斯康星州因经济压力和资源匮乏而导致人们无法选择理想避孕方法的问题。
Contraception. 2022 Nov;115:22-26. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.07.014. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
2
Use of preferred contraceptive method among young adults in Texas and California: A comparison by state and insurance coverage.德克萨斯州和加利福尼亚州年轻成年人中首选避孕方法的使用情况:按州和保险覆盖范围的比较。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 31;18(8):e0290726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290726. eCollection 2023.
3
Women's Experiences With Family Planning Under COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional, Interactive Voice Response Survey in Malawi, Nepal, Niger, and Uganda.新冠疫情下的妇女计划生育体验:马拉维、尼泊尔、尼日尔和乌干达的横断面交互式语音应答调查。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Aug 30;10(4). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00063.
4
Financial Instability and Delays in Access to Sexual and Reproductive Health Care Due to COVID-19.由于 COVID-19 导致的金融不稳定和性健康及生殖健康护理获取延迟。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Apr;31(4):469-479. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0493. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
5
Housing Stability and Access to General Healthcare and Reproductive Healthcare Among Women in Ohio.俄亥俄州女性的住房稳定性以及获得一般医疗保健和生殖保健的机会。
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Nov;26(11):2185-2191. doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03492-5. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
6
Assessing differences in contraceptive provision through telemedicine among reproductive health providers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.评估美国 COVID-19 大流行期间通过远程医疗在生殖健康提供者中提供避孕措施的差异。
Reprod Health. 2022 Apr 22;19(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01388-9.
7
Contraceptive and abortion practices of young Ghanaian women aged 15-24: evidence from a nationally representative survey.15至24岁加纳年轻女性的避孕与堕胎行为:来自一项全国代表性调查的证据
Reprod Health. 2021 Jul 18;18(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01189-6.
8
Health care provider bias in the Appalachian region: The frequency and impact of contraceptive coercion.阿巴拉契亚地区医疗保健提供者的偏见:避孕强制的频率和影响。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug;58(4):772-780. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14157. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
9
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共4部分,第1部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0.
10
A cross-country qualitative study on contraceptive method mix: contraceptive decisionmaking among youth.跨国定性研究:避孕方法组合——青年避孕决策
Reprod Health. 2021 May 25;18(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01160-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Contraceptive care and method use by sexual and gender minority status: insights from a longitudinal panel of sexual and reproductive healthcare patients in Wisconsin.按性取向和性别少数群体身份划分的避孕护理与方法使用情况:来自威斯康星州性与生殖健康护理患者纵向面板的见解
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2544432. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2544432. Epub 2025 Sep 12.
2
Relationship between experiencing a challenge or delay accessing contraception and contraceptive self-efficacy: Data from a 2022 nationally representative online survey.经历避孕挑战或获取避孕措施延迟与避孕自我效能之间的关系:来自2022年全国代表性在线调查的数据。
Reprod Health. 2025 Apr 15;22(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02003-3.
3
A review of recommendations, efficacy, and patient safety for over-the-counter norgestrel for daily contraception.
非处方炔诺孕酮用于日常避孕的推荐意见、疗效及患者安全性综述。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2025 Mar 11;18:100591. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100591. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Patient Preferences or Provider Pressure? The Relationship Between Coercive Contraceptive Care and Preferred Contraceptive Use.患者偏好还是提供者压力?强制避孕护理与首选避孕方法使用之间的关系。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 14;13(2):145. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13020145.
5
Food Insecurity and Women's Choice of Reversible Contraceptives: Differential Effects by Maternal Age.食物不安全与妇女对可逆避孕措施的选择:按产妇年龄的差异效应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Oct 10;21(10):1343. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101343.
6
Unfulfilled and method-specific contraceptive preferences among reproductive-aged contraceptive users in Arizona, Iowa, New Jersey, and Wisconsin.亚利桑那州、爱荷华州、新泽西州和威斯康星州育龄期避孕使用者未满足和特定方法的避孕偏好。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun;59(3):e14297. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14297. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
7
Contraception use and satisfaction among mothers with low income: Evidence from the Baby's First Years study.低收入母亲的避孕措施使用和满意度:来自“婴儿第一年研究”的证据。
Contraception. 2024 Jan;129:110297. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110297. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
8
Health care provider bias in the Appalachian region: The frequency and impact of contraceptive coercion.阿巴拉契亚地区医疗保健提供者的偏见:避孕强制的频率和影响。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug;58(4):772-780. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14157. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
9
Association of Primary Care Physicians' Individual- and Community-Level Characteristics With Contraceptive Service Provision to Medicaid Beneficiaries.初级保健医生的个体和社区特征与向医疗补助受益人群提供避孕服务的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Mar 3;4(3):e230106. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0106.