Suppr超能文献

农业健康研究(2005 - 2010年)中农场女性的过敏性和非过敏性喘息

Allergic and non-allergic wheeze among farm women in the Agricultural Health Study (2005-2010).

作者信息

Islam Jessica Y, Mohamed Ahmed, Umbach David M, London Stephanie J, Henneberger Paul K, Beane Freeman Laura E, Sandler Dale P, Hoppin Jane A

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, NC State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

Center for Human Health and the Environment, NC State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Occup Environ Med. 2022 Aug 8. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2022-108252.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Farms represent complex environments for respiratory exposures including hays, grains and pesticides. Little is known about the impact of these exposures on women's respiratory health. We evaluated the association of farm exposures with allergic and non-allergic wheeze among women in the Agricultural Health Study, a study of farmers and their spouses based in Iowa and North Carolina.

METHODS

We used self-reported data (2005-2010) on current use (≤12 months) of 15 pesticides (selected based on frequency of use) and occupational farm activities from 20 164 women. We defined allergic wheeze as reporting wheeze and doctor-diagnosed hay fever (7%) and non-allergic wheeze as wheeze but not hay fever (8%) in the past 12 months. Using polytomous logistic regression, we evaluated associations of wheeze subtypes with pesticides and other farm exposures (eg, raising farm animals) using no wheeze/hay fever as the referent, adjusting for age, body mass index, state, current asthma, glyphosate use and smoking.

RESULTS

Current use of any pesticide, reported by 7% of women, was associated with both allergic (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.67) and non-allergic (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.51) wheeze. Four pesticides were associated with at least one wheeze subtype: glyphosate, with both wheeze subtypes; diazinon and fly spray with only allergic wheeze; carbaryl with only non-allergic wheeze. Working weekly with mouldy hay was associated with allergic (OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.26 to 2.80) and non-allergic wheeze (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.18 to 2.42).

CONCLUSION

Use of specific pesticides and certain farm activities may contribute to wheeze among farm women.

摘要

背景

农场是复杂的呼吸道暴露环境,包括干草、谷物和农药。人们对这些暴露对女性呼吸道健康的影响知之甚少。在农业健康研究中,我们评估了农场暴露与女性过敏性和非过敏性喘息之间的关联,该研究以爱荷华州和北卡罗来纳州的农民及其配偶为研究对象。

方法

我们使用了20164名女性的自我报告数据(2005 - 2010年),内容包括15种农药(根据使用频率选定)的当前使用情况(≤12个月)以及农场职业活动。我们将过敏性喘息定义为在过去12个月内报告有喘息且经医生诊断为花粉症(7%),非过敏性喘息定义为有喘息但无花粉症(8%)。使用多分类逻辑回归,我们以无喘息/花粉症为参照,评估喘息亚型与农药及其他农场暴露(如饲养农场动物)之间的关联,并对年龄、体重指数、州、当前哮喘、草甘膦使用情况和吸烟进行了调整。

结果

7%的女性报告当前使用任何农药,这与过敏性(比值比:1.36,95%置信区间:1.10至1.67)和非过敏性(比值比:1.25,95%置信区间:1.04至1.51)喘息均相关。四种农药与至少一种喘息亚型相关:草甘膦与两种喘息亚型均相关;二嗪农和喷雾杀虫剂仅与过敏性喘息相关;西维因仅与非过敏性喘息相关。每周处理发霉干草与过敏性(比值比:1.88,95%置信区间:1.26至2.80)和非过敏性喘息(比值比:1.69,95%置信区间:1.18至2.42)相关。

结论

特定农药的使用和某些农场活动可能导致农场女性出现喘息。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Pulmonary health effects of agriculture.农业对肺部健康的影响。
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2016 Mar;22(2):144-9. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000247.
6
Wheezing in tobacco farm workers in southern Brazil.巴西南部烟草农场工人的喘息症状
Am J Ind Med. 2015 Nov;58(11):1217-28. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22447. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
7
Occupational exposure to pesticides and respiratory health.职业性接触农药与呼吸健康。
Eur Respir Rev. 2015 Jun;24(136):306-19. doi: 10.1183/16000617.00006014.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验