Animal Behaviour and Welfare Team, AgResearch Ltd., Ruakura Research Centre, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand.
Animal Behaviour and Welfare Team, AgResearch Ltd., Ruakura Research Centre, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand.
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Oct;105(10):8298-8315. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-21819. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
Dairy cows are motivated to access dry lying surfaces and will seek protection from wind and rain, but winter conditions may limit these opportunities when cows are managed outdoors. The primary aim of this observational study was to determine the effects of weather and paddock soil conditions on lying behavior of dairy cows managed outdoors during winter and fed crop in situ, a practice occurring in New Zealand with year-round grazing of dairy cows. A secondary aim was to characterize eating and ruminating behaviors during winter weather and paddock soil conditions. Four groups (99 nonlactating, pregnant cows each) were managed on 4 outdoor paddock areas on the same farm; the groups were fed pasture silage and grazed either kale (2 groups) or fodder beet (2 groups). Behaviors were recorded using validated leg-based (lying behavior) and ear-based (eating and ruminating time) accelerometers on 30 focal cows in each group over 32 d. Soil depth and wetness were scored daily at 25 points along 4 transects within each paddock area using recognized technical measures (penetrometer, soil volumetric water content), which were compared with practical tools for farmer use (ruler, moisture meter, percentage of sites in paddock scored as dry, wet, sodden, or with surface water pooling). Rainfall occurred most days during the study (mean 1.6 mm/d; maximum 12.2 mm/d), resulting in wet and muddy paddocks (mud depth with ruler: mean 6 cm, maximum 18 cm; paddock sites scored as wet or sodden: mean 34%, maximum 100%; paddock sites with surface water pooling: mean 27%, maximum 100%). Group lying time was 9.6 ± 2.3 h/d (mean ± standard deviation); however, 21% of cows consistently lay less than 8 h/d (to a minimum of 4.9 h/d). A mixed regression model tested the effects of daily weather and paddock soil conditions on daily lying time, with group as the observational unit, day as repeated measure, crop type as a fixed effect, crop type interactions with explanatory variables, and random intercepts of group and paddock within group. Lying time was less on the day of and day after rainfall (24 and 29 min/d less for 1 mm increase in rainfall, respectively). Two days after rainfall, lying time rebounded to about 1 h longer than before the rainfall. On the day after the heaviest rainfall event, group average lying time was only 2.5 ± 1.9 h/d (mean ± standard deviation); in 2 groups, 30% and 38% of cows, respectively, did not lie down at all for 24 h. Lying time decreased with deteriorating paddock soil conditions, especially with increasing surface water pooling, suggesting that this may be a useful measure to estimate the quality of the lying surface. Descriptively, ruminating time appeared to decrease with increased surface water pooling, possibly due to decreased lying time. Our results demonstrated that dairy cows could experience periods of short or no lying time during inclement weather and muddy paddock soil conditions. Prior rainfall and surface water pooling may be useful measures to determine if lying time, and thus animal welfare, are compromised.
奶牛会主动寻找干燥的躺卧表面,并寻求避风避雨的地方,但在冬季,当奶牛在户外管理时,冬季条件可能会限制它们这样做的机会。本观察性研究的主要目的是确定天气和牧场土壤条件对冬季户外管理的奶牛的躺卧行为的影响,并在现场投喂作物,这是新西兰全年放牧奶牛的一种做法。次要目的是描述冬季天气和牧场土壤条件下的采食和反刍行为。4 组(每组 99 头非泌乳、怀孕奶牛)在同一农场的 4 个户外牧场区进行管理;这些组喂食牧场青贮饲料,并在 2 个组放牧羽衣甘蓝,在 2 个组放牧饲用甜菜。在 32 天内,使用经验证的基于腿部(躺卧行为)和基于耳朵(采食和反刍时间)的加速度计在每组的 30 头焦点奶牛上记录行为。每天在每个牧场区的 4 个横截线上使用认可的技术措施(探针、土壤体积含水量)对土壤深度和湿度进行评分,这些技术措施与农民使用的实用工具(尺子、湿度计、牧场区中标记为干燥、潮湿、泥泞或有地表水的位点的百分比)进行比较。研究期间大多数天都有降雨(平均 1.6 毫米/天;最大 12.2 毫米/天),导致牧场潮湿泥泞(尺子测量的泥泞深度:平均 6 厘米,最大 18 厘米;标记为潮湿或泥泞的牧场区位点:平均 34%,最大 100%;有地表水的牧场区位点:平均 27%,最大 100%)。群体躺卧时间为 9.6 ± 2.3 小时/天(平均值±标准偏差);然而,21%的奶牛持续躺卧时间少于 8 小时/天(最低 4.9 小时/天)。混合回归模型测试了每日天气和牧场土壤条件对每日躺卧时间的影响,以组为观测单位,天为重复测量,作物类型为固定效应,作物类型与解释变量的相互作用,以及组和组内牧场的随机截距。降雨当天和第二天的躺卧时间减少(分别减少 24 和 29 分钟/天)。降雨两天后,躺卧时间反弹到比降雨前长约 1 小时。在降雨量最大的事件后的第二天,组平均躺卧时间仅为 2.5 ± 1.9 小时/天(平均值±标准偏差);在 2 个组中,分别有 30%和 38%的奶牛在 24 小时内完全不躺卧。躺卧时间随着牧场土壤条件的恶化而减少,尤其是随着地表水的积聚而减少,这表明这可能是一种有用的措施来估计躺卧表面的质量。描述性地,反刍时间似乎随着地表水的积聚而减少,可能是由于躺卧时间减少。我们的研究结果表明,奶牛可能会在恶劣天气和泥泞牧场土壤条件下经历短时间或没有躺卧时间。先前的降雨和地表水积聚可能是确定躺卧时间(因此是动物福利)是否受到影响的有用指标。