• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

户外饲养奶牛的冬季行为:天气和牧场土壤条件的影响。

Behavior of dairy cows managed outdoors in winter: Effects of weather and paddock soil conditions.

机构信息

Animal Behaviour and Welfare Team, AgResearch Ltd., Ruakura Research Centre, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand.

Animal Behaviour and Welfare Team, AgResearch Ltd., Ruakura Research Centre, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2022 Oct;105(10):8298-8315. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-21819. Epub 2022 Aug 6.

DOI:10.3168/jds.2022-21819
PMID:35940919
Abstract

Dairy cows are motivated to access dry lying surfaces and will seek protection from wind and rain, but winter conditions may limit these opportunities when cows are managed outdoors. The primary aim of this observational study was to determine the effects of weather and paddock soil conditions on lying behavior of dairy cows managed outdoors during winter and fed crop in situ, a practice occurring in New Zealand with year-round grazing of dairy cows. A secondary aim was to characterize eating and ruminating behaviors during winter weather and paddock soil conditions. Four groups (99 nonlactating, pregnant cows each) were managed on 4 outdoor paddock areas on the same farm; the groups were fed pasture silage and grazed either kale (2 groups) or fodder beet (2 groups). Behaviors were recorded using validated leg-based (lying behavior) and ear-based (eating and ruminating time) accelerometers on 30 focal cows in each group over 32 d. Soil depth and wetness were scored daily at 25 points along 4 transects within each paddock area using recognized technical measures (penetrometer, soil volumetric water content), which were compared with practical tools for farmer use (ruler, moisture meter, percentage of sites in paddock scored as dry, wet, sodden, or with surface water pooling). Rainfall occurred most days during the study (mean 1.6 mm/d; maximum 12.2 mm/d), resulting in wet and muddy paddocks (mud depth with ruler: mean 6 cm, maximum 18 cm; paddock sites scored as wet or sodden: mean 34%, maximum 100%; paddock sites with surface water pooling: mean 27%, maximum 100%). Group lying time was 9.6 ± 2.3 h/d (mean ± standard deviation); however, 21% of cows consistently lay less than 8 h/d (to a minimum of 4.9 h/d). A mixed regression model tested the effects of daily weather and paddock soil conditions on daily lying time, with group as the observational unit, day as repeated measure, crop type as a fixed effect, crop type interactions with explanatory variables, and random intercepts of group and paddock within group. Lying time was less on the day of and day after rainfall (24 and 29 min/d less for 1 mm increase in rainfall, respectively). Two days after rainfall, lying time rebounded to about 1 h longer than before the rainfall. On the day after the heaviest rainfall event, group average lying time was only 2.5 ± 1.9 h/d (mean ± standard deviation); in 2 groups, 30% and 38% of cows, respectively, did not lie down at all for 24 h. Lying time decreased with deteriorating paddock soil conditions, especially with increasing surface water pooling, suggesting that this may be a useful measure to estimate the quality of the lying surface. Descriptively, ruminating time appeared to decrease with increased surface water pooling, possibly due to decreased lying time. Our results demonstrated that dairy cows could experience periods of short or no lying time during inclement weather and muddy paddock soil conditions. Prior rainfall and surface water pooling may be useful measures to determine if lying time, and thus animal welfare, are compromised.

摘要

奶牛会主动寻找干燥的躺卧表面,并寻求避风避雨的地方,但在冬季,当奶牛在户外管理时,冬季条件可能会限制它们这样做的机会。本观察性研究的主要目的是确定天气和牧场土壤条件对冬季户外管理的奶牛的躺卧行为的影响,并在现场投喂作物,这是新西兰全年放牧奶牛的一种做法。次要目的是描述冬季天气和牧场土壤条件下的采食和反刍行为。4 组(每组 99 头非泌乳、怀孕奶牛)在同一农场的 4 个户外牧场区进行管理;这些组喂食牧场青贮饲料,并在 2 个组放牧羽衣甘蓝,在 2 个组放牧饲用甜菜。在 32 天内,使用经验证的基于腿部(躺卧行为)和基于耳朵(采食和反刍时间)的加速度计在每组的 30 头焦点奶牛上记录行为。每天在每个牧场区的 4 个横截线上使用认可的技术措施(探针、土壤体积含水量)对土壤深度和湿度进行评分,这些技术措施与农民使用的实用工具(尺子、湿度计、牧场区中标记为干燥、潮湿、泥泞或有地表水的位点的百分比)进行比较。研究期间大多数天都有降雨(平均 1.6 毫米/天;最大 12.2 毫米/天),导致牧场潮湿泥泞(尺子测量的泥泞深度:平均 6 厘米,最大 18 厘米;标记为潮湿或泥泞的牧场区位点:平均 34%,最大 100%;有地表水的牧场区位点:平均 27%,最大 100%)。群体躺卧时间为 9.6 ± 2.3 小时/天(平均值±标准偏差);然而,21%的奶牛持续躺卧时间少于 8 小时/天(最低 4.9 小时/天)。混合回归模型测试了每日天气和牧场土壤条件对每日躺卧时间的影响,以组为观测单位,天为重复测量,作物类型为固定效应,作物类型与解释变量的相互作用,以及组和组内牧场的随机截距。降雨当天和第二天的躺卧时间减少(分别减少 24 和 29 分钟/天)。降雨两天后,躺卧时间反弹到比降雨前长约 1 小时。在降雨量最大的事件后的第二天,组平均躺卧时间仅为 2.5 ± 1.9 小时/天(平均值±标准偏差);在 2 个组中,分别有 30%和 38%的奶牛在 24 小时内完全不躺卧。躺卧时间随着牧场土壤条件的恶化而减少,尤其是随着地表水的积聚而减少,这表明这可能是一种有用的措施来估计躺卧表面的质量。描述性地,反刍时间似乎随着地表水的积聚而减少,可能是由于躺卧时间减少。我们的研究结果表明,奶牛可能会在恶劣天气和泥泞牧场土壤条件下经历短时间或没有躺卧时间。先前的降雨和地表水积聚可能是确定躺卧时间(因此是动物福利)是否受到影响的有用指标。

相似文献

1
Behavior of dairy cows managed outdoors in winter: Effects of weather and paddock soil conditions.户外饲养奶牛的冬季行为:天气和牧场土壤条件的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Oct;105(10):8298-8315. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-21819. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
2
Effects of 2 wintering practices on behavioral and physiological indicators of welfare of nonlactating, pregnant dairy cattle in a pasture-based system.冬季 2 种饲养方式对放牧条件下非泌乳期、妊娠奶牛行为和生理福利指标的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Sep;107(9):7079-7091. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-24441. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
3
Do Walking Distance and Time Away from the Paddock Influence Daily Behaviour Patterns and Milk Yield of Grazing Dairy Cows?离牧场的行走距离和时间会影响放牧奶牛的日常行为模式和产奶量吗?
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 7;11(10):2903. doi: 10.3390/ani11102903.
4
Muddy conditions reduce hygiene and lying time in dairy cattle and increase time spent on concrete.泥泞的环境会降低奶牛的卫生状况和躺卧时间,并增加其在水泥地面上停留的时间。
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Mar;100(3):2090-2103. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11972. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
5
Implications of prolonged milking time on time budgets and lying behavior of cows in large pasture-based dairy herds.长时间挤奶对大型牧场奶牛群时间分配和卧息行为的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Nov;101(11):10391-10397. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15049. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
6
Effects of 3 surface types on dairy cattle behavior, preference, and hygiene.三种表面类型对奶牛行为、偏好和卫生的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Feb;102(2):1530-1541. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14792. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
7
Nighttime pasture access: Comparing the effect of production pasture and exercise paddock on milk production and cow behavior in an automatic milking system.夜间放牧:比较生产牧场和运动围场对自动挤奶系统中奶牛产奶量和行为的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Nov;102(11):10423-10438. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16416. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
8
Effects of space allowance on the behavior and physiology of cattle temporarily managed on rubber mats.空间余量对临时饲养在橡胶垫上的牛的行为和生理的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Sep;98(9):6226-35. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9593. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
9
Effects of short-term repeated exposure to different flooring surfaces on the behavior and physiology of dairy cattle.短期反复接触不同地面材料对奶牛行为和生理的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2014 May;97(5):2753-62. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7310. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
10
Shelter preference and behavior of dairy cows managed outdoors during calving in temperate winter conditions.温带冬季产犊期间户外饲养奶牛的庇护所偏好与行为
JDS Commun. 2024 Feb 1;5(5):447-451. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2023-0485. eCollection 2024 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Welfare perspectives on the management of pregnant, nonlactating dairy cattle during the winter months in pasture-based systems.基于牧场系统中冬季怀孕非泌乳奶牛管理的福利视角
Anim Front. 2025 Apr 22;15(2):21-31. doi: 10.1093/af/vfaf004. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Behavior of Transition Dairy Cows Managed Outdoors During the Autumn and Spring Calving Seasons.春秋产犊季节户外饲养的过渡奶牛的行为表现
Animals (Basel). 2025 Feb 20;15(5):621. doi: 10.3390/ani15050621.
3
Shelter preference and behavior of dairy cows managed outdoors during calving in temperate winter conditions.
温带冬季产犊期间户外饲养奶牛的庇护所偏好与行为
JDS Commun. 2024 Feb 1;5(5):447-451. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2023-0485. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Welfare of dairy cows.奶牛福利。
EFSA J. 2023 May 16;21(5):e07993. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7993. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Do device that simulate methane capture equipment, as a mask located in the head of dairy cows affect their welfare?模拟甲烷收集设备的装置,如位于奶牛头部的口罩,会影响它们的福利吗?
J Vet Med Sci. 2022 Nov 1;84(11):1461-1464. doi: 10.1292/jvms.22-0290. Epub 2022 Sep 22.