Chen Jennifer M, Stull Carolyn L, Ledgerwood David N, Tucker Cassandra B
Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, 95616.
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, 95616.
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Mar;100(3):2090-2103. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11972. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
Dairy cattle spend less time lying and show signs of increased stress when housed in rainy and windy conditions, but no work has separated the effects of exposure to inclement weather from muddy conditions underfoot. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of muddy conditions alone on lying behavior, hygiene, and physiological responses. We housed pairs of pregnant, nonlactating dairy cattle (n = 12; 6 primigravid heifers, 6 multiparous cows) in enclosed pens with dirt floors and a concrete feed apron. Cattle were exposed to 3 levels of soil moisture: 90 (dry), 74 (muddy), or 67% (very muddy) dry matter for 5 d each in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design. Lying time was measured on all days with data loggers, and lying locations and postures were recorded on the final day of each treatment. Before and after each treatment, blood samples were collected, and the percentage of dirty surface area was measured on the udder, hind leg, and side of each animal. Cattle spent less time lying down in muddier conditions, especially in the first 24 h of exposure, when cows and heifers spent only 3.2 and 5.8 h, respectively, lying down in the muddiest treatment compared with 12.5 and 12.7 h on dry soil. When the soil was dry, cattle never chose to lie down on concrete, but in muddier conditions they spent a greater proportion of their lying time on concrete (mean ± SE: 56 ± 14 and 10 ± 8% in the very muddy and muddy treatments, respectively). The shift in lying location was more marked for heifers, and all 6 spent ≥87% of their lying time on concrete in the muddiest treatment. When cattle chose to lie down on wetter soil, they limited the surface area exposed to their surroundings by tucking their legs beneath their bodies (mean ± SE: 30 ± 11, 15 ± 4, and 5 ± 2% of lying observations in the very muddy, muddy, and dry treatments, respectively). Despite cattle spending less time on wetter soil, all 3 measured body parts became dirtier in muddier conditions (1.4-, 1.6-, and 1.8-fold more on the leg, udder, and side, respectively, in the muddiest compared with the driest treatment). In addition, higher soil moisture levels resulted in greater reductions in white blood cell counts relative to baseline levels (-0.95, -0.43, and 0.34 × 10/L relative to baseline levels in the very muddy, muddy, and dry treatments). Muddy conditions, even in the absence of wind or rain, are aversive for cattle and have negative implications for their welfare.
在多雨多风的环境中饲养时,奶牛躺卧的时间减少,并表现出压力增加的迹象,但尚无研究将暴露于恶劣天气的影响与脚下泥泞状况的影响区分开来。我们的目标是评估仅泥泞状况对躺卧行为、卫生状况和生理反应的影响。我们将成对的怀孕非泌乳奶牛(n = 12;6头初产小母牛,6头经产母牛)饲养在有泥土地面和混凝土饲喂区的封闭围栏中。奶牛分别暴露于3种土壤湿度水平:90%(干燥)、74%(泥泞)或67%(非常泥泞)的干物质含量,每种水平持续5天,采用重复的3×3拉丁方设计。每天使用数据记录器测量躺卧时间,并在每种处理的最后一天记录躺卧位置和姿势。在每次处理前后采集血样,并测量每头动物乳房、后腿和身体侧面的脏污表面积百分比。在更泥泞的条件下,奶牛躺卧的时间减少,尤其是在暴露的最初24小时内,在最泥泞的处理中,母牛和小母牛分别仅躺卧3.2小时和5.8小时,而在干燥土壤上分别为12.5小时和12.7小时。当土壤干燥时,奶牛从不选择在混凝土上躺卧,但在更泥泞的条件下,它们在混凝土上躺卧的时间占比更大(平均值±标准误:在非常泥泞和泥泞处理中分别为56±14%和10±8%)。躺卧位置的变化对小母牛更为明显,在最泥泞的处理中,所有6头小母牛躺卧时间的≥87%是在混凝土上。当奶牛选择在更潮湿的土壤上躺卧时,它们会将腿蜷缩在身体下方,以减少暴露于周围环境的表面积(平均值±标准误:在非常泥泞、泥泞和干燥处理中,分别占躺卧观察次数的30±11%、15±4%和5±2%)。尽管奶牛在更潮湿的土壤上躺卧的时间减少,但在更泥泞的条件下,所有测量的三个身体部位都变得更脏(与最干燥处理相比,在最泥泞处理中,腿部、乳房和身体侧面的脏污程度分别增加了1.4倍、1.6倍和1.8倍)。此外,较高的土壤湿度水平导致白细胞计数相对于基线水平的下降幅度更大(在非常泥泞、泥泞和干燥处理中,相对于基线水平分别下降了-0.95×10⁹/L、-0.43×10⁹/L和0.34×10⁹/L)。即使没有风雨,泥泞状况对奶牛来说也是令人厌恶的,并且对它们的福利有负面影响。