Meunier Aurelie, Longworth Louise, Kowal Stacey, Ramagopalan Sreeram, Love-Koh James, Griffin Susan
PHMR Limited, London, England, UK.
PHMR Limited, London, England, UK.
Value Health. 2023 Jan;26(1):60-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.06.011. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
Governments and health technology assessment agencies are putting greater focus on and efforts in understanding and addressing health inequities. Cost-effectiveness analyses are used to evaluate the costs and health gains of different interventions to inform the decision-making process on funding of new treatments. Distributional cost-effectiveness analysis (DCEA) is an extension of cost-effectiveness analysis that quantifies the equity impact of funding new treatments. Key challenges for the routine and consistent implementation of DCEA are the lack of clearly defined equity concerns from decision makers and endorsed measures to define equity subgroups and the availability of evidence that allows analysis of differences in data inputs associated with the equity characteristics of interest. In this article, we detail the data gaps and challenges to build robust DCEA analysis routinely in health technology assessment and suggest actions to overcome these hurdles.
各国政府和卫生技术评估机构正更加关注并努力理解和解决卫生公平问题。成本效益分析用于评估不同干预措施的成本和健康收益,为新治疗方法的资金决策过程提供信息。分布成本效益分析(DCEA)是成本效益分析的延伸,用于量化资助新治疗方法的公平影响。DCEA常规和一致实施面临的主要挑战包括决策者缺乏明确界定的公平问题、缺乏认可的公平亚组定义措施,以及缺乏能够分析与感兴趣的公平特征相关的数据输入差异的证据。在本文中,我们详细阐述了在卫生技术评估中常规开展稳健的DCEA分析时的数据差距和挑战,并提出了克服这些障碍的行动建议。