Francis Troy, Teshome Bethlehem, Stanimirovic Aleksandra, Rac Valeria E
University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2025 May 12;15(5):e099673. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099673.
Healthcare systems face the challenge of managing limited resources while addressing the growing demand for care and the need for equitable access. Traditional cost-effectiveness analyses focus on maximising health benefits but often fail to account for how these benefits are distributed across various populations, potentially increasing health inequities. As a result, there is increasing interest in distributional cost-effectiveness analysis (DCEA), which incorporates equity considerations by explicitly assessing how health outcomes and costs are shared among diverse populations. This scoping review explores the practical application of DCEA methodology in evaluating programs and interventions. We seek to learn more about the barriers to DCEA's application, highlighting its practical challenges, limited use globally and the steps necessary to integrate equity more effectively into implementing and adopting programs and interventions into healthcare policy and resource allocation.
To evaluate the use of DCEA in the literature, a scoping review will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Scoping Review Extension guidelines. Systematic searches will be performed across scientific databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, BASE, APA Psych and JSTOR), grey literature sources (Google Custom Search Engine), and handsearching to identify eligible articles published from January 2015 to March 2025. No limits will be placed on language. Reviewers will independently chart data from eligible studies using standardised data abstraction. The collected information will be synthesised both quantitatively and narratively.
Formal ethical approval is not necessary as this study will not collect primary data. The findings will be shared with professional networks, published in conference proceedings and submitted for peer-reviewed publication.
医疗保健系统在应对护理需求不断增长以及公平获取护理的需求时,面临着管理有限资源的挑战。传统的成本效益分析侧重于最大化健康效益,但往往未能考虑这些效益如何在不同人群中分配,这可能会加剧健康不平等。因此,人们对分配性成本效益分析(DCEA)的兴趣与日俱增,该分析通过明确评估不同人群如何共享健康结果和成本来纳入公平考量。本综述探讨了DCEA方法在评估项目和干预措施中的实际应用。我们试图更多地了解DCEA应用的障碍,突出其实际挑战、在全球范围内的有限使用,以及更有效地将公平纳入医疗保健政策和资源分配中实施和采用项目及干预措施所需的步骤。
为了评估文献中DCEA的使用情况,本综述将遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目——综述扩展指南。将在科学数据库(MEDLINE、SCOPUS、BASE、APA Psych和JSTOR)、灰色文献来源(谷歌定制搜索引擎)中进行系统检索,并通过手工检索来识别2015年1月至2025年3月发表的符合条件的文章。不设语言限制。评审人员将使用标准化的数据提取方法独立地从符合条件的研究中提取数据。收集到的信息将进行定量和定性综合分析。
由于本研究不会收集原始数据,因此无需正式的伦理批准。研究结果将与专业网络分享,发表在会议论文集中,并提交同行评审发表。