• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病对接受择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的依诺肝素抗凝患者一年临床结局的影响。

Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on One-Year Clinical Outcomes in Patients Anticoagulated with Bivalirudin Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

机构信息

National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Department of Cardiology, Xinxiang Central Hospital, Xinxiang, China.

出版信息

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022 Jan-Dec;28:10760296221113344. doi: 10.1177/10760296221113344.

DOI:10.1177/10760296221113344
PMID:35942867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9373170/
Abstract

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are considered to increase the risk of thrombosis and bleeding. However, whether DM is an independent risk factor for events in patients anticoagulated with bivalirudin during elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not clear. Patients anticoagulated with bivalirudin during elective PCI from January 2017 to August 2018 in 3 centers were enrolled. The primary endpoint of thrombotic events was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE, including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemic revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke); the primary endpoint of bleeding events was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3 or 5 bleeding. 1152 patients were finally enrolled. After one-year follow-up, 89 (7.7%) MACCE and 21 (1.8%) BARC 2, 3 or 5 bleeding occurred. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed DM was not an independent risk factor for MACCE (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.029, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.674-1.573,  = .893), but peripheral artery disease (PAD) history (HR: 2.200, 95%CI: 1.290-3.751,  = .004) was an independent risk factor for MACCE. DM was not an independent risk factor for BARC 2, 3 or 5 bleeding (HR: 0.732, 95%CI: 0.293-1.831,  = .505), but PAD history (HR: 3.029, 95%CI: 1.102-8.332,  = .032) and low hemoglobin level (HR = 0.972, 95%CI: 0.947-0.998,  = .036) were independent risk factors for BARC 2, 3 or 5 bleeding. DM was not an independent risk factor for one-year thrombotic and bleeding events in patients anticoagulated with bivalirudin during elective PCI. More attention should be paid to PAD history and hemoglobin level to identify high-risk patients.

摘要

患有糖尿病(DM)的患者被认为会增加血栓形成和出血的风险。然而,在择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间使用比伐卢定抗凝的患者中,DM 是否是事件的独立危险因素尚不清楚。

在 3 个中心,招募了 2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 8 月期间接受择期 PCI 时使用比伐卢定抗凝的患者。血栓形成事件的主要终点是主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE,包括全因死亡、心肌梗死、缺血血运重建、支架血栓形成和中风);出血事件的主要终点是 Bleeding Academic Research Consortium(BARC)2、3 或 5 级出血。最终纳入了 1152 例患者。经过 1 年随访,发生 89 例(7.7%)MACCE 和 21 例(1.8%)BARC 2、3 或 5 级出血。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,DM 不是 MACCE 的独立危险因素(风险比 [HR]:1.029,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.674-1.573, = 0.893),但外周动脉疾病(PAD)病史(HR:2.200,95%CI:1.290-3.751, = 0.004)是 MACCE 的独立危险因素。DM 不是 BARC 2、3 或 5 级出血的独立危险因素(HR:0.732,95%CI:0.293-1.831, = 0.505),但 PAD 病史(HR:3.029,95%CI:1.102-8.332, = 0.032)和低血红蛋白水平(HR = 0.972,95%CI:0.947-0.998, = 0.036)是 BARC 2、3 或 5 级出血的独立危险因素。在择期 PCI 期间使用比伐卢定抗凝的患者中,DM 不是 1 年内血栓形成和出血事件的独立危险因素。应更加关注 PAD 病史和血红蛋白水平,以识别高危患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c41/9373170/3adaa1087bba/10.1177_10760296221113344-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c41/9373170/3adaa1087bba/10.1177_10760296221113344-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c41/9373170/3adaa1087bba/10.1177_10760296221113344-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on One-Year Clinical Outcomes in Patients Anticoagulated with Bivalirudin Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.糖尿病对接受择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的依诺肝素抗凝患者一年临床结局的影响。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022 Jan-Dec;28:10760296221113344. doi: 10.1177/10760296221113344.
2
One-year clinical outcomes of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention.接受择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者中比伐卢定与普通肝素的一年临床结局。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2023 Oct;17(10):102858. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2023.102858. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
3
[Effect of platelet reactivity on clinical events in patients using bivalirudin in selective percutaneous coronary intervention].[血小板反应性对接受比伐卢定选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者临床事件的影响]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 24;49(8):783-789. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20210106-00014.
4
Association between post-percutaneous coronary intervention bivalirudin infusion and net adverse clinical events: a post hoc analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后比伐卢定输注与净不良临床事件的关系:GLOBAL LEADERS 研究的事后分析。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020 Jan 1;6(1):22-30. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz051.
5
Bivalirudin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and independent predictors of postoperative adverse events in these patients: A real world retrospective study.比伐卢定在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中的应用及这些患者术后不良事件的独立预测因素:一项真实世界回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Mar 12;100(10):e25003. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025003.
6
[Clinical characteristics and prognosis between male and female patients with premature coronary artery disease after intervention].[干预后早发冠心病男性与女性患者的临床特征及预后]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2019 Oct 24;47(10):798-805. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2019.10.006.
7
Bivalirudin vs heparin in cardiac-cerebral ischemic and bleeding events among Chinese STEMI patients during percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective cohort study.比伐卢定与肝素在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的中国 STEMI 患者中心脏-脑缺血和出血事件中的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2023 Nov 13;56:e13013. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X2023e13013. eCollection 2023.
8
The impact of unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin on patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.普通肝素或比伐卢定对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的影响。
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Apr;31(2):177-184. doi: 10.1111/joic.12462. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
9
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with and without Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与双联抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Apr 20;23(9):4549. doi: 10.3390/ijms23094549.
10
Prolonged High-Dose Bivalirudin Infusion Reduces Major Bleeding Without Increasing Stent Thrombosis in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Novel Insights From an Updated Meta-Analysis.延长高剂量比伐卢定输注可减少接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的大出血且不增加支架内血栓形成:一项更新的荟萃分析的新见解
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jul 22;5(7):e003515. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003515.

本文引用的文献

1
Peripheral Artery Disease on The Prognosis Value of Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的稳定性冠心病患者外周动脉疾病的预后价值:回顾性、单中心队列研究。
Heart Surg Forum. 2021 Oct 19;24(5):E887-E892. doi: 10.1532/hsf.4211.
2
Diabetes mellitus is not associated with enhanced bleeding risk in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.糖尿病与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后患者出血风险增加无关。
Diabet Med. 2021 May;38(5):e14532. doi: 10.1111/dme.14532. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
3
Sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2(SGLT-2)抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂治疗 2 型糖尿病:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2021 Jan 13;372:m4573. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4573.
4
Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Antithrombotic Management Patterns and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insights From the EPICOR Asia Study.糖尿病对急性冠状动脉综合征患者抗栓治疗模式及长期临床结局的影响:来自 EPICOR Asia 研究的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Nov 17;9(22):e013476. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013476. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
5
2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.2020年欧洲心脏病学会非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2021 Apr 7;42(14):1289-1367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575.
6
The Impact of Coexistence of Smoking and Diabetes on the Coronary Artery Severity and Outcomes following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results from the 1 Jordanian PCI Registry.吸烟与糖尿病并存对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后冠状动脉严重程度及预后的影响:约旦经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册研究结果
Int J Vasc Med. 2020 Jul 2;2020:7624158. doi: 10.1155/2020/7624158. eCollection 2020.
7
Impact of diabetes on clinical outcome among elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the ELDERLY ACS 2 trial.糖尿病对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者临床结局的影响:来自 ELDERLY ACS 2 试验的观察。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2020 Jun;21(6):453-459. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000978.
8
Assessing Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Diabetes: An Update.评估糖尿病患者的心血管风险:更新。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2020;16(4):266-274. doi: 10.2174/1573403X15666191111123622.
9
The impact of diabetes mellitus and hypertension on clinical outcomes in a population of Iranian patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention: A retrospective cohort study.糖尿病和高血压对伊朗经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者临床结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Nov;21(11):1647-1653. doi: 10.1111/jch.13705. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
10
Influence of Baseline Anemia on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Cessation and Risk of Adverse Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.基线贫血对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗停药和不良事件风险的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr;12(4):e007133. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007133.