University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2022 Aug 9;44(3):36. doi: 10.1007/s40656-022-00518-7.
This paper focuses on the links between Jakob von Uexküll's theoretical biology and Adolf Portmann's conception of organic life. Its main purpose is to show that Uexküll and Portmann not only share a view of the living being as an autonomous and holistically organized entity, but also base this view on the seminal idea of the subjectivity of the organism. In other words, the respective holistic principles securing the autonomy of the living being-the Bauplan, for Uexküll; the Innerlichkeit, for Portmann-share an essentially subjective character. Such principles, indeed, express themselves in a centrally directed and formative way; moreover, in organisms endowed with a central nervous system, they also extend their influence on the overt behavioral sphere and on the organism's capacity to give meaning to the surrounding reality. The conclusion of the article will show how, though starting from this common background, the two authors develop divergent positions on the issue of the anthropological difference. If Portmann emphasizes the special status of the relationship between the human animal and the world, Uexküll tends to see a substantial continuity in the biosemiotic processes through which human and non-human animals constitute their species-specific worlds of experience (Umwelten).
本文聚焦于雅可布·冯·于克斯屈尔的理论生物学与阿道夫·波特曼的有机生命概念之间的联系。其主要目的在于表明,于克斯屈尔和波特曼不仅共享一种将生物体视为自主且整体组织化实体的观点,而且还基于生物体的主观性这一核心思想来支撑这一观点。换句话说,分别确保生物体自主性的整体原则——于克斯屈尔的“形态发生图式”;波特曼的“内在性”——具有本质上的主观性。这些原则以一种集中导向和形成性的方式表达自身;此外,在具有中枢神经系统的生物体中,它们还将其影响扩展到明显的行为领域以及生物体赋予周围现实意义的能力上。本文的结论将表明,尽管从这一共通背景出发,两位作者在人类学差异问题上仍持有不同的立场。如果波特曼强调人类动物与世界之间的特殊关系,那么于克斯屈尔则倾向于看到在生物符号学过程中存在实质性的连续性,人类和非人类动物通过这些过程构成了其特定物种的经验世界(Umwelten)。