• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经脐部与经阴道途径腹腔镜附件肿物切除术的比较

Comparison of laparoscopic adnexal mass extraction via the transumbilical and transvaginal routes.

作者信息

Güngördük Kemal, Gülseren Varol, Özdemir İsa Aykut

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Oct;42(7):3112-3116. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2106556. Epub 2022 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1080/01443615.2022.2106556
PMID:35947017
Abstract

This study was performed to compare the transumbilical (TU) and transvaginal (TV) routes for adnexal mass removal from the abdominal cavity. Data from 93 women who underwent laparoscopic (LS) surgery for the removal of benign adnexal masses at three centres between January 2016 and December 2020 were examined retrospectively. The specimen retrieval times in the TU and TV groups were 9.0 ± 2.0 and 9.8 ± 2.5 min, respectively ( = .373). Additional analgesic was required in 13.8% and 14.3% of cases in the TU and TV groups, respectively. The mean 3-month (2-4 months) postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score was lower in the TV group than in the TU group. The postoperative vaginal length did not differ between the TU and TV groups (8.9 (8.7-9.1) vs. 8.7 (8.4-9.1) cm;  = .465). Oophorectomy and the TU route were found to be independent risk factors for the worsening of the VAS score. Sexual function index scores were similar in the two groups. The TV method for specimen removal in LS surgery may cause less pain in the early postoperative period and less dyspareunia in the later period without shortening the length of the vagina.Impact Statement Compared with open procedures, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is associated with faster recovery times, better patient quality of life and lower postoperative complication rates. The removal of an adnexal mass from the abdominal cavity is performed most commonly using the suprapubic, transumbilical (TU) or transvaginal (TV) route. The specimen retrieval times in the TU and TV groups were 9.0 ± 2.0 and 9.8 ± 2.5 min, respectively ( = .373). The mean 3-month (2-4 months) postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score was lower in the TV group than in the TU group. Oophorectomy and the TU route were found to be independent risk factors for the worsening of the VAS score. Sexual function index scores were similar in the two groups. In conclusion, specimen removal via the TV route in LS surgery may cause less pain in the early postoperative period and less dyspareunia in the later period without reducing the length of the vagina.

摘要

本研究旨在比较经脐(TU)和经阴道(TV)途径从腹腔切除附件包块的情况。对2016年1月至2020年12月期间在三个中心接受腹腔镜(LS)手术切除良性附件包块的93例女性的数据进行回顾性分析。TU组和TV组的标本取出时间分别为9.0±2.0分钟和9.8±2.5分钟(P=0.373)。TU组和TV组分别有13.8%和14.3%的病例需要额外镇痛。TV组术后3个月(2 - 4个月)的视觉模拟评分(VAS)平均得分低于TU组。TU组和TV组术后阴道长度无差异(8.9(8.7 - 9.1)cm对8.7(8.4 - 9.1)cm;P=0.465)。发现卵巢切除术和TU途径是VAS评分恶化的独立危险因素。两组的性功能指数评分相似。LS手术中经TV途径取出标本在术后早期可能引起的疼痛较轻,后期性交困难较少且不缩短阴道长度。

影响声明

与开放手术相比,微创手术(MIS)恢复时间更快、患者生活质量更好且术后并发症发生率更低。从腹腔切除附件包块最常用耻骨上、经脐(TU)或经阴道(TV)途径。TU组和TV组的标本取出时间分别为9.0±2.0分钟和9.8±2.5分钟(P=0.373)。TV组术后3个月(2 - 4个月)的视觉模拟评分(VAS)平均得分低于TU组。发现卵巢切除术和TU途径是VAS评分恶化的独立危险因素。两组的性功能指数评分相似。总之,LS手术中经TV途径取出标本在术后早期可能引起的疼痛较轻,后期性交困难较少且不缩短阴道长度。

相似文献

1
Comparison of laparoscopic adnexal mass extraction via the transumbilical and transvaginal routes.经脐部与经阴道途径腹腔镜附件肿物切除术的比较
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Oct;42(7):3112-3116. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2106556. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
2
Evaluation of the optimal laparoscopic method for benign ovarian mass extraction: a transumbilical route using a bag made from a surgical glove versus a lateral transabdominal route employing a standard endobag.评估良性卵巢肿物摘除的最佳腹腔镜方法:使用手术手套制成的袋子经脐部入路与采用标准腹腔内袋经腹外侧入路的比较。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Apr;40(3):378-381. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1623765. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
3
Transumbilical versus transvaginal retrieval of surgical specimens at laparoscopy: a randomized trial.经脐与经阴道腹腔镜手术标本取出的随机对照研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;207(2):112.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.016. Epub 2012 May 23.
4
Transumbilical versus lateral transabdominal removal of benign adnexal masses in laparoscopic surgery-A randomized trial.腹腔镜手术中经脐与经腹外侧切除良性附件肿物的随机试验
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Nov;218:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.08.040. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
5
Comparison of Transvaginal and Transumbilical Laparoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Ovarian Cysts.经阴道与经脐腹腔镜下单孔手术治疗卵巢囊肿的比较。
JSLS. 2021 Apr-Jun;25(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00019.
6
Transabdominal versus transvaginal specimen extraction in mini-laparoscopic surgery.迷你腹腔镜手术中经腹与经阴道标本取出术
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Dec;45(12):2400-2406. doi: 10.1111/jog.14134. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
7
Short-term efficacy of transvaginal specimen extraction for right colon cancer based on propensity score matching: A retrospective cohort study.基于倾向评分匹配的经阴道标本提取对右半结肠癌短期疗效的回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.07.025. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
8
Comparative analysis of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in ovarian cystectomy.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术与经脐单孔腹腔镜手术治疗卵巢囊肿切除术的对比分析。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 Feb;47(2):757-764. doi: 10.1111/jog.14603. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
9
Influence of transvaginal laparoscopic surgery on sexual function, life quality and short-term efficacy of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer.经阴道腹腔镜手术对结直肠癌患者性功能、生活质量及短期疗效的影响。
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Jul 15;14(7):5098-5106. eCollection 2022.
10
Assessment of women's sexual quality of life after benign adnexal surgery using vNOTES approach in comparison to conventional laparoscopy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.经阴道NOTES 途径与传统腹腔镜比较评估良性附件手术后女性的生活质量:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 7;13(9):e073691. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073691.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of transvaginal or transumbilical tissue extraction at laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: A 12-year experience.腹腔镜妇科手术中经阴道或经脐组织提取的比较:12年经验
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Aug;170(2):835-843. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70050. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
2
Transvaginal versus transabdominal specimen extraction in minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经阴道与经腹微创手术标本取出的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jun 3;409(1):172. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03361-5.