• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经脐与经阴道腹腔镜手术标本取出的随机对照研究。

Transumbilical versus transvaginal retrieval of surgical specimens at laparoscopy: a randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;207(2):112.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.016. Epub 2012 May 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.016
PMID:22704765
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare transumbilical (TU) and transvaginal (TV) route for retrieval of surgical specimens at laparoscopy.

STUDY DESIGN

Women scheduled for a laparoscopic resection of an adnexal mass were randomized to have their surgical specimen removed either through a posterior colpotomy (n = 34) or the umbilical port site (n = 32). Group allocation was concealed from patients and bedside clinicians. The primary outcome was postoperative incisional pain assessed by a 10-cm visual analog scale at 1, 3, and 24 hours after surgery.

RESULTS

TV retrieval caused less postoperative pain than TU specimen extraction at each time point (visual analog scale score at 1 hour: 2.6 ± 2.9 vs 1.2 ± 2.0, P = .03; at 3 hours: 2.4 ± 2.0 vs 1.4 ± 2.0, P = .02; and at 24 hours: 1.1 ± 1.5 vs 0.5 ± 1.4, P = .02). A higher proportion of women in the TU group than in the TV group indicated the umbilicus as the most painful area at 1 and 3 hours postoperatively. Two months after surgery, the participants scored similarly as to their overall satisfaction, cosmetic outcome, and dyspareunia upon resumption of intercourse.

CONCLUSION

A TV approach for specimen removal after laparoscopic resection of adnexal masses offers the advantage of less postoperative pain than TU retrieval.

摘要

目的

我们旨在比较经脐(TU)和经阴道(TV)途径在腹腔镜下获取手术标本。

研究设计

计划行腹腔镜附件肿块切除术的女性患者被随机分为经后穹窿切开术(n = 34)或脐部穿刺器(n = 32)取出手术标本。患者和床边临床医生均不知道分组情况。主要结局是术后 1、3 和 24 小时通过 10cm 视觉模拟量表评估的切口疼痛。

结果

TV 取标本比 TU 标本提取在每个时间点都引起更少的术后疼痛(术后 1 小时视觉模拟评分:2.6 ± 2.9 比 1.2 ± 2.0,P =.03;术后 3 小时:2.4 ± 2.0 比 1.4 ± 2.0,P =.02;术后 24 小时:1.1 ± 1.5 比 0.5 ± 1.4,P =.02)。TU 组中比 TV 组中有更多的女性在术后 1 和 3 小时表示脐部是最疼痛的区域。术后 2 个月,两组患者对总体满意度、美容效果和恢复性生活后的性交痛评分相似。

结论

腹腔镜附件肿块切除术后经 TV 途径取出标本比 TU 回收具有术后疼痛较轻的优势。

相似文献

1
Transumbilical versus transvaginal retrieval of surgical specimens at laparoscopy: a randomized trial.经脐与经阴道腹腔镜手术标本取出的随机对照研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;207(2):112.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.016. Epub 2012 May 23.
2
Evaluation of the optimal laparoscopic method for benign ovarian mass extraction: a transumbilical route using a bag made from a surgical glove versus a lateral transabdominal route employing a standard endobag.评估良性卵巢肿物摘除的最佳腹腔镜方法:使用手术手套制成的袋子经脐部入路与采用标准腹腔内袋经腹外侧入路的比较。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Apr;40(3):378-381. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1623765. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
3
Comparison of Transvaginal and Transumbilical Laparoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Ovarian Cysts.经阴道与经脐腹腔镜下单孔手术治疗卵巢囊肿的比较。
JSLS. 2021 Apr-Jun;25(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00019.
4
Comparison of laparoscopic adnexal mass extraction via the transumbilical and transvaginal routes.经脐部与经阴道途径腹腔镜附件肿物切除术的比较
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Oct;42(7):3112-3116. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2106556. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
5
Transumbilical versus lateral transabdominal removal of benign adnexal masses in laparoscopic surgery-A randomized trial.腹腔镜手术中经脐与经腹外侧切除良性附件肿物的随机试验
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Nov;218:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.08.040. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
6
Transabdominal versus transvaginal specimen extraction in mini-laparoscopic surgery.迷你腹腔镜手术中经腹与经阴道标本取出术
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Dec;45(12):2400-2406. doi: 10.1111/jog.14134. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
7
Comparison between transumbilical and transabdominal ports for the laparoscopic retrieval of benign adnexal masses: a randomized trial.经脐与经腹途径腹腔镜附件良性肿物取出术的比较:一项随机试验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Dec;153(2):198-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.07.029. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
8
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for treatment of benign adnexal disease: single-center experience over 3-years.经脐单孔腹腔镜手术(LESS)治疗附件良性疾病:3 年单中心经验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 Nov-Dec;19(6):695-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.07.002.
9
Is single-port laparoscopy for benign adnexal disease less painful than conventional laparoscopy? A single-center randomized controlled trial.单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗附件良性疾病的疼痛比较:一项单中心随机对照研究。
Fertil Steril. 2012 Oct;98(4):973-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.016. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
10
Minimizing ancillary ports size in gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized trial.妇科腹腔镜检查中辅助端口尺寸的最小化:一项随机试验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Nov-Dec;12(6):480-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.09.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of transvaginal or transumbilical tissue extraction at laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: A 12-year experience.腹腔镜妇科手术中经阴道或经脐组织提取的比较:12年经验
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Aug;170(2):835-843. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70050. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
2
Transvaginal versus transabdominal specimen extraction in minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经阴道与经腹微创手术标本取出的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jun 3;409(1):172. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03361-5.
3
Robotic Full Lobe Hepatectomy With Natural Orifice Extraction: Case Series Describing the Novel Technique of Robotic Major Hepatectomy and Transvaginal Specimen Extraction.
经自然腔道取标本的机器人辅助全肝叶切除术:描述机器人辅助肝大部切除术及经阴道标本取出新技术的病例系列报道
Ann Surg Open. 2021 Mar 16;2(1):e041. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000041. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Transvaginal versus transabdominal specimen extraction surgery for right colon cancer: A propensity matching study.经阴道与经腹右结肠癌标本提取手术:一项倾向匹配研究。
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 6;13:1168961. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1168961. eCollection 2023.
5
Women's Perception of Transgastric and Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) - Impact of Medical Education, Stage of Life and Cross-Cultural Aspects.女性对经胃和经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)的认知——医学教育、生活阶段及跨文化因素的影响
Int J Womens Health. 2022 Dec 29;14:1881-1895. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S382457. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparison of conventional versus single port laparoscopy for surgical treatment of gynecological diseases: a pilot study.传统腹腔镜与单孔腹腔镜治疗妇科疾病的比较:一项初步研究。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Mar;17(1):252-260. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.105823. Epub 2021 May 5.
7
Robotic transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for bilateral salpingo oophorectomy.机器人经阴道自然腔道内镜手术双侧输卵管卵巢切除术
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2020 Jun 23;7:100113. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2020.100113. eCollection 2020 Jul.
8
Comparison between transumbilical and transvaginal morcellation of a large uterus during single-port-access total laparoscopic hysterectomy.单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术中经脐与经阴道对大子宫进行粉碎术的比较。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 May;63(3):379-386. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.3.379. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
9
Prophylactic McCall Culdoplasty by a Vaginal Approach during Mini-Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.经阴道入路行预防性麦考尔氏子宫圆韧带悬吊术在迷你腹腔镜子宫切除术。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 May 19;2019:8047924. doi: 10.1155/2019/8047924. eCollection 2019.
10
A Novel Approach to Combined Vaginal and Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery.
JSLS. 2019 Apr-Jun;23(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00006.