Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ.
Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Mount Kisco.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 1;45(9):391-402. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000930. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the data regarding the use of neoadjuvant, perioperative, surgical, and adjuvant treatment options in localized gastric cancer patients and to develop Appropriate Use Criteria recommended by a panel of experts convened by the American Radium Society.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses methodology was used to develop an extensive analysis of peer-reviewed phase 2/2R/3 trials, as well as meta-analyses found within the Ovid Medline database between 2010 and 2020. The expert panel then rated the appropriateness of various treatments in 5 representative clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi).
For patients with medically operable locally advanced gastric cancer, the strongest recommendation was for perioperative chemotherapy based on high-quality data. Acceptable alternatives included surgery followed by either chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). For patients with upfront resection of stages I to III gastric cancer (no neoadjuvant therapy), the group strongly recommended adjuvant therapy with either chemotherapy alone or CRT, based on high-quality data. For patients with locally advanced disease who received preoperative chemotherapy without tumor regression, the group strongly recommended postoperative chemotherapy or postoperative CRT. Finally, for medically inoperable gastric cancer patients, there was moderate consensus recommending definitive concurrent CRT.
The addition of chemotherapy and/or radiation, either in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or perioperative setting, results in improved survival rates for patients compared with surgery alone. For inoperable patients, definitive CRT is a reasonable treatment option, though largely palliative.
本研究旨在系统评估局部胃癌患者新辅助、围手术期、手术和辅助治疗选择的数据,并制定由美国镭学会召集的专家组推荐的适当使用标准。
采用系统评价和荟萃分析方法的首选报告项目,对 2010 年至 2020 年 Ovid Medline 数据库中同行评审的 2/2R/3 期试验和荟萃分析进行了广泛分析。然后,专家小组通过成熟的共识方法(改良 Delphi 法)对 5 个代表性临床场景中的各种治疗方法的适当性进行了评分。
对于有医学手术适应证的局部晚期胃癌患者,强烈推荐基于高质量数据的围手术期化疗。可接受的替代方案包括手术加化疗或同期放化疗(CRT)。对于接受 I 期至 III 期胃癌(无新辅助治疗)直接切除的患者,该组强烈推荐单独化疗或 CRT 作为辅助治疗,这是基于高质量数据。对于接受术前化疗但肿瘤无退缩的局部晚期疾病患者,该组强烈建议术后化疗或术后 CRT。最后,对于不能手术的胃癌患者,有中度共识建议采用确定性同期 CRT。
与单独手术相比,化疗和/或放疗(无论是新辅助、辅助还是围手术期)的加入可提高患者的生存率。对于不能手术的患者,确定性 CRT 是一种合理的治疗选择,尽管主要是姑息性的。