Koropeckyj-Cox Lydia, Christianson Reid D, Yuan Yongping
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois.
Trans ASABE. 2021;64(2):691-704. doi: 10.13031/trans.14017.
Legumes included in corn-based crop rotation systems provide a variety of benefits to the subsequent crops and potentially to the environment. This review aims to synthesize available data from the literature on legume N credits and the effects of crop rotations on water quality, as well as to analyze the cost benefits associated with different legume-corn rotation systems. We found that there was much variation in reported values for legume N credits to subsequent corn crops, from both empirical results and recommendations made by U.S. land grant universities. But despite inherent complexity, accounting for this contribution is critical when estimating optimal N fertilizer application rates as part of nutrient management. Results from research on the influence of crop rotations on water quality show that including legumes in corn-based rotation systems generally decreases nitrate-N concentrations in subsurface drainage discharge. Our cost analysis showed that incorporating legumes in cropping systems reduced N fertilizer and pesticide costs compared to conventional cropping systems, i.e., continuous corn and corn-soybean rotations, but extended rotations, such as corn-soybean-alfalfa-alfalfa-alfalfa, are not as profitable as conventional systems in the U.S. Midwest. In comparing continuous corn and corn-soybean rotations, although their impacts on water quality are not significantly different when using overall means from the literature data, corn-soybean rotations are more profitable than continuous corn. When using data from papers that directly compared the two, we found that switching from continuous corn to corn-soybean can provide a benefit of $5 per kg N loss reduction. The cost analysis methods used could be tailored to any location or management scenario with appropriate inputs and serve as a useful tool for assessing cost benefits for other agricultural conservation practices. Legume-corn crop rotations have the potential to be an effective conservation practice with the ultimate goal of improving water quality, and, with further research, these rotations could be made even more effective by integrating them into a multi-practice system.
玉米轮作系统中包含的豆类作物对后续作物以及环境都有多种益处。本综述旨在综合文献中关于豆类固氮量以及轮作对水质影响的现有数据,并分析不同豆类 - 玉米轮作系统的成本效益。我们发现,无论是实证结果还是美国赠地大学给出的建议,报告的豆类对后续玉米作物的固氮量数值都存在很大差异。但尽管存在内在复杂性,在估算作为养分管理一部分的最佳氮肥施用量时,考虑这一贡献至关重要。关于轮作对水质影响的研究结果表明,在基于玉米的轮作系统中纳入豆类通常会降低地下排水排放中的硝态氮浓度。我们的成本分析表明,与传统种植系统(即连续种植玉米和玉米 - 大豆轮作)相比,在种植系统中纳入豆类可降低氮肥和农药成本,但在美国中西部,延长轮作(如玉米 - 大豆 - 苜蓿 - 苜蓿 - 苜蓿)的盈利能力不如传统系统。在比较连续种植玉米和玉米 - 大豆轮作时,尽管从文献数据的总体均值来看它们对水质的影响没有显著差异,但玉米 - 大豆轮作比连续种植玉米更具盈利性。当使用直接比较两者的论文数据时,我们发现从连续种植玉米改为玉米 - 大豆轮作,每减少1千克氮损失可带来5美元的收益。所使用的成本分析方法可以根据任何地点或管理情景进行调整,并作为评估其他农业保护措施成本效益的有用工具。豆类 - 玉米轮作有可能成为一种有效的保护措施,其最终目标是改善水质,并且通过进一步研究,将这些轮作纳入多措施系统可使其更加有效。