Suppr超能文献

热稀释法测定右心室容积和射血分数:与双平面血管造影术的比较

Thermodilution determination of right ventricular volume and ejection fraction: a comparison with biplane angiography.

作者信息

Urban P, Scheidegger D, Gabathuler J, Rutishauser W

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1987 Jul;15(7):652-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198707000-00005.

Abstract

In 13 patients without tricuspid incompetence, we compared the values of right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) and right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) obtained with biplane angiography and thermodilution at end-inspiration. A modification of Simpson's rule was used to measure angiographic volumes, and a new pulmonary artery catheter equipped with a rapid response thermistor was used to measure the ejection fraction by the Holt plateau method. The correlation between the two methods was acceptable (r = 0.83 for RVEF, r = 0.71 for RVEDV) despite the limitations of both angiography and thermodilution. Thermodilution underestimated RVEF and overestimated RVEDV when compared to angiography. The variation coefficient with thermodilution for five measurements of the RVEF per patient was 12 +/- 5%. In addition to pressure and cardiac output measurements, monitoring of RVEF and RVEDV in the ICU should be possible with such a catheter. Further work is needed to assess the clinical relevance of these added data and their use for optimizing the therapy of right ventricular failure in acutely ill patients.

摘要

在13例无三尖瓣关闭不全的患者中,我们比较了在吸气末通过双平面血管造影和热稀释法获得的右心室射血分数(RVEF)和右心室舒张末期容积(RVEDV)的值。采用辛普森法则的一种改良方法测量血管造影容积,并使用配备快速响应热敏电阻的新型肺动脉导管通过霍尔特平台法测量射血分数。尽管血管造影和热稀释法都存在局限性,但两种方法之间的相关性是可以接受的(RVEF的r = 0.83,RVEDV的r = 0.71)。与血管造影相比,热稀释法低估了RVEF并高估了RVEDV。每位患者RVEF五次测量的热稀释变异系数为12±5%。除了压力和心输出量测量外,使用这种导管在重症监护病房(ICU)监测RVEF和RVEDV应该是可行的。需要进一步开展工作来评估这些额外数据的临床相关性及其在优化急性病患者右心室衰竭治疗中的应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验