Aqueous Humor-Derived MYD88 L265P Mutation Analysis in Vitreoretinal Lymphoma: A Potential Less Invasive Method for Diagnosis and Treatment Response Assessment.

PURPOSE

To investigate whether MYD88 L265P mutation, which is frequently present in vitreoretinal lymphoma, can be detected in aqueous humor, a specimen that can be obtained in a clinic setting, potentially mitigating the need for more invasive vitrectomy procedures, and whether this approach can be used to monitor treatment response.

DESIGN

Observational case series.

SUBJECTS

Patients who were diagnosed with biopsy-confirmed or clinically diagnosed vitreoretinal lymphoma or biopsy-confirmed vitritis.

METHODS

We evaluated aqueous humor-derived (AHD) MYD88 L265P mutation during vitreous biopsy or at the initial presentation in the clinic if vitreous biopsy was not feasible. Demographic or clinical features of patients were retrospectively reviewed. Aqueous humor-derived MYD88 L265P mutation was re-evaluated after patients completed a course of intravitreal methotrexate and rituximab injection therapy. The NM_002468.4: c.794T>C (p.L265P) mutation in the MYD88 gene was evaluated in AHD cellular and cell-free DNA using allele-specific polymerase chain reaction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Detection of AHD MYD88 L265P mutation at the initial diagnosis and to monitor the treatment response.

RESULTS

Aqueous humor from 18 eyes of 14 patients with biopsy-confirmed or clinically diagnosed vitreoretinal lymphoma and 3 eyes of 3 patients with biopsy-confirmed vitritis were evaluated. Aqueous humor-derived MYD88 L265P mutation was detected in cell-based and cell-free DNA from 15 (83%) of 18 eyes with biopsy-confirmed or clinically diagnosed vitreoretinal lymphoma but not identified in any of the 3 eyes with vitritis. The mutation was less readily detectable in cellular DNA (10 of 18) compared with cell-free DNA (15 of 18). Furthermore, aqueous sampling after intravitreal methotrexate and rituximab injection therapy revealed absence of this mutation after complete response in 7 eyes. The mutation was detected in 1 eye that developed recurrence in a posttreatment window of 6 months. After a mean of follow-up of 9 months, there was no clinical evidence of vitreoretinal lymphoma recurrence in the 7 eyes with no detectable AHD MYD88 L265P mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

This investigational study suggests that AHD MYD88 L265P can be detected in eyes with lymphoma and may thus serve as a surrogate, less invasive biopsy in the diagnosis and follow-up of vitreoretinal lymphoma, particularly when cell-free DNA is evaluated.