• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用离散选择实验理解印度尼西亚玛琅地区社区卫生工作者的就业偏好。

Understanding community health worker employment preferences in Malang district, Indonesia, using a discrete choice experiment.

机构信息

Health Systems Science, George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Public Administration, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Aug;7(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008936.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008936
PMID:35953209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9379506/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community health workers (CHWs) play a critical role in supporting health systems, and in improving accessibility to primary healthcare. In many settings CHW programmes do not have formalised employment models and face issues of high attrition and poor performance. This study aims to determine the employment preferences of CHWs in Malang district, Indonesia, to inform policy interventions.

METHODS

A discrete choice experiment was conducted with 471 CHWs across 28 villages. Attributes relevant to CHW employment were identified through a multistage process including literature review, focus group discussions and expert consultation. Respondents' choices were analysed with a mixed multinomial logit model and latent class analyses.

RESULTS

Five attributes were identified: (1) supervision; (2) training; (3) monthly financial benefit; (4) recognition; and (5) employment structure. The most important influence on choice of job was a low monthly financial benefit (US$2) (β=0.53, 95% CI=0.43 to 0.63), followed by recognition in the form of a performance feedback report (β=0.13, 95% CI=0.07 to 0.20). A large monthly financial benefit (US$20) was most unappealing to respondents (β=-0.13, 95% CI=-0.23 to -0.03). Latent class analysis identified two groups of CHWs who differed in their willingness to accept either job presented and preferences over specific attributes. Preferences diverged based on respondent characteristics including experience, hours' worked per week and income.

CONCLUSION

CHWs in Malang district, Indonesia, favour a small monthly financial benefit which likely reflects the unique cultural values underpinning the programme and a desire for remuneration that is commensurate with the limited number of hours worked. CHWs also desire enhanced methods of performance feedback and greater structure around training and their rights and responsibilities. Fulfilling these conditions may become increasingly important should CHWs work longer hours.

摘要

背景

社区卫生工作者(CHW)在支持卫生系统和提高初级医疗保健可及性方面发挥着关键作用。在许多情况下,CHW 计划没有正式的就业模式,并面临高离职率和绩效不佳的问题。本研究旨在确定印度尼西亚马朗地区 CHW 的就业偏好,为政策干预提供信息。

方法

对 28 个村庄的 471 名 CHW 进行了离散选择实验。通过文献回顾、焦点小组讨论和专家咨询等多阶段过程确定了与 CHW 就业相关的属性。使用混合多项逻辑回归模型和潜在类别分析对受访者的选择进行分析。

结果

确定了五个属性:(1)监督;(2)培训;(3)每月经济利益;(4)认可;(5)就业结构。对工作选择影响最大的因素是每月经济利益低(约 2 美元)(β=0.53,95%CI=0.43 至 0.63),其次是绩效反馈报告形式的认可(β=0.13,95%CI=0.07 至 0.20)。高每月经济利益(约 20 美元)对受访者最没有吸引力(β=-0.13,95%CI=-0.23 至 -0.03)。潜在类别分析确定了两组 CHW,他们在接受提供的工作和对特定属性的偏好方面存在差异。偏好的差异基于受访者的特征,包括经验、每周工作小时数和收入。

结论

印度尼西亚马朗地区的 CHW 倾向于小额的每月经济利益,这可能反映了该计划背后独特的文化价值观以及与工作时间有限相称的薪酬愿望。CHW 还希望增强绩效反馈方法,并在培训以及他们的权利和责任方面提供更大的结构。如果 CHW 工作时间更长,满足这些条件可能变得越来越重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ab/9379506/09d57fce45ba/bmjgh-2022-008936f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ab/9379506/09d57fce45ba/bmjgh-2022-008936f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ab/9379506/09d57fce45ba/bmjgh-2022-008936f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding community health worker employment preferences in Malang district, Indonesia, using a discrete choice experiment.运用离散选择实验理解印度尼西亚玛琅地区社区卫生工作者的就业偏好。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Aug;7(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008936.
2
Understanding community health worker incentive preferences in Uganda using a discrete choice experiment.利用离散选择实验了解乌干达社区卫生工作者的激励偏好。
J Glob Health. 2021 Mar 10;11:07005. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.07005.
3
Community health workers at the dawn of a new era: 8. Incentives and remuneration.社区卫生工作者新纪元的黎明:8. 激励与薪酬。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Oct 12;19(Suppl 3):106. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00750-w.
4
It is not all about salary: a discrete-choice experiment to determine community health workers' motivation for work in Nigeria.不仅仅是工资:一项用于确定尼日利亚社区卫生工作者工作动机的离散选择实验。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Oct;7(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009718.
5
The effect of payment and incentives on motivation and focus of community health workers: five case studies from low- and middle-income countries.薪酬与激励措施对社区卫生工作者积极性和专注度的影响:来自低收入和中等收入国家的五个案例研究
Hum Resour Health. 2015 Jul 14;13:58. doi: 10.1186/s12960-015-0051-1.
6
Understanding incentive preferences of community health workers using discrete choice experiments: a multicountry protocol for Kenya, Uganda, Bangladesh and Haiti.使用离散选择实验理解社区卫生工作者的激励偏好:肯尼亚、乌干达、孟加拉国和海地的多国家方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 11;9(12):e033601. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033601.
7
Assessing the feasibility and acceptability of a financial versus behavioural incentive-based intervention for community health workers in rural Indonesia.评估针对印度尼西亚农村地区社区卫生工作者的基于经济激励与行为激励的干预措施的可行性和可接受性。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Jun 23;7(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00871-7.
8
Sources of community health worker motivation: a qualitative study in Morogoro Region, Tanzania.社区卫生工作者激励因素的来源:坦桑尼亚莫罗戈罗地区的一项定性研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2013 Oct 10;11:52. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-11-52.
9
Factors influencing motivation and job satisfaction among supervisors of community health workers in marginalized communities in South Africa.影响南非边缘化社区社区卫生工作者主管人员积极性和工作满意度的因素
Hum Resour Health. 2016 Sep 6;14(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12960-016-0151-6.
10
Motivation and satisfaction among community health workers in Morogoro Region, Tanzania: nuanced needs and varied ambitions.坦桑尼亚莫罗戈罗地区社区卫生工作者的积极性与满意度:细微的需求与多样的抱负
Hum Resour Health. 2015 Jun 5;13:44. doi: 10.1186/s12960-015-0035-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative differences in job preferences among doctors in different levels of public hospitals in Henan, China: a discrete choice experiment.中国河南不同级别公立医院医生职业偏好的比较差异:一项离散选择实验
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 23;16:1607061. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1607061. eCollection 2025.
2
Towards stunting eradication in Indonesia: Time to invest in community health workers.迈向印度尼西亚消除发育迟缓:是时候投资于社区卫生工作者了。
Public Health Chall. 2023 Jul 21;2(3):e108. doi: 10.1002/puh2.108. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Community health workers at the dawn of a new era: 11. CHWs leading the way to "Health for All".社区卫生工作者:新时代的开拓者 11. 引领全民健康之路
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Oct 12;19(Suppl 3):111. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00755-5.
2
Stated job preferences of three health worker cadres in Ethiopia: a discrete choice experiment.埃塞俄比亚三位卫生工作者干部的明确工作偏好:离散选择实验。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Oct 12;36(9):1418-1427. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab081.
3
Incentive preferences for community health volunteers in Kenya: findings from a discrete choice experiment.
健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
4
Examining the challenges encountered by community health workers and empowering them to address mental health disorders: A qualitative study in Indonesia.审视社区卫生工作者所面临的挑战并赋予他们应对精神障碍的能力:印度尼西亚的一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2024 Dec 11;12(1):27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.12.003. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Identification, mapping, and self-reported practice patterns of village doctors in Sitakunda subdistrict, Bangladesh.孟加拉国锡塔昆达分区乡村医生的识别、定位和自我报告的实践模式。
J Glob Health. 2024 Sep 13;14:04185. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04185.
6
What medical specialists want to stay in remote areas of Indonesia: Discrete choice experiments.印尼偏远地区的医疗专家希望留下:离散选择实验。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 15;19(8):e0308225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308225. eCollection 2024.
7
A systematic review of the types, workload, and supervision mechanism of community health workers: lessons learned for Indonesia.系统评价社区卫生工作者的类型、工作量和监督机制:对印度尼西亚的经验教训。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Mar 11;25(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02319-2.
肯尼亚社区卫生志愿者的激励偏好:来自离散选择实验的发现。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 5;11(7):e048059. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048059.
4
Assessing the feasibility and acceptability of a financial versus behavioural incentive-based intervention for community health workers in rural Indonesia.评估针对印度尼西亚农村地区社区卫生工作者的基于经济激励与行为激励的干预措施的可行性和可接受性。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Jun 23;7(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00871-7.
5
Understanding community health worker incentive preferences in Uganda using a discrete choice experiment.利用离散选择实验了解乌干达社区卫生工作者的激励偏好。
J Glob Health. 2021 Mar 10;11:07005. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.07005.
6
Cost-effectiveness of a mobile technology-enabled primary care intervention for cardiovascular disease risk management in rural Indonesia.移动技术支持的初级保健干预措施在印度尼西亚农村地区进行心血管疾病风险管理的成本效益分析
Health Policy Plan. 2021 May 17;36(4):435-443. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab025.
7
The relative importance of material and non-material incentives for community health workers: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Western Kenya.物质激励和非物质激励对社区卫生工作者的相对重要性:来自肯尼亚西部一项离散选择实验的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Feb;246:112726. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112726. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
8
Getting more than "claps": incentive preferences of voluntary community-based mobilizers in Tanzania.获得不仅仅是“掌声”:坦桑尼亚志愿社区动员者的激励偏好。
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Dec 17;17(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0438-5.
9
Community engagement to manage acute malnutrition: implementation research in Kupang district, Indonesia.社区参与管理急性营养不良:印度尼西亚古邦地区的实施研究。
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Sep 1;97(9):597-604. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.223339. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
10
Association of Multifaceted Mobile Technology-Enabled Primary Care Intervention With Cardiovascular Disease Risk Management in Rural Indonesia.多方面移动技术支持的初级保健干预措施与印度尼西亚农村心血管疾病风险管理的关联。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Oct 1;4(10):978-986. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.2974.